Advertisement

The Importance of Internet Neutrality to Protecting Human Rights Online

  • Andrew McDiarmid
  • Matthew Shears
Chapter

Abstract

The history of the Internet has shown that it has tremendous capacity to advance human rights, in particular freedom of expression and related rights. Over two billion people around the world connect every day to access and share information and participate in wide-ranging aspects of social, economic, and political life. For individuals, connecting to the Internet provides access to an ever-expanding array of information resources and online services. At the same time, it offers opportunities for people to reach new audiences at very low cost compared to other forms of mass media. To an unprecedented degree, the Internet transcends national borders and reduces barriers to the free flow of information, enabling free expression, democratic participation, and the enjoyment of other rights.

Keywords

Supra Note Internet Access Internet User Federal Communication Commission Content Provider 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. ARCEP. (2012, September). Internet and network neutrality: Proposals and recommendations (pp. 24–26). http://www.arcep.fr/uploads/tx_gspublication/net-neutralite-orientations-sept2010-eng.pdf
  2. Houghton, B. (2012, October 1). Spotify Adds Germany's Deutsche Telekom to growing list of mobile deals. Hypebot. http://www.hypebot.com/hypebot/2012/10/spotify-adds-germanys-deutsche-telekom-to-growing-list-of-mobile-deals.html
  3. McKinsey. (2012, January). Online and upcoming: The Internet's impact on aspiring countries. http://www.mckinsey.com/client_service/high_tech/latest_thinking/impact_of_the_internet_on_aspiring_countries
  4. Morris, J. B., Jr., & Wong, C. M. (2009, Fall). Revisiting user control: The emergence and success of a first amendment theory for the Internet age. University of North Carolina First Amendment Law Review, 8. http://www.cdt.org/files/pdfs/morris_wong_user_control.pdf
  5. Ruggie, J. (2011, March 21). Guiding principles on business and human rights: Implementing the United Nations “Protect, Respect and Remedy” Framework.Google Scholar
  6. Saltzer, J. H., Reed, D. P., & Clark, D. D. (1984, November 4). End-to-end arguments in system design. ACM Transactions in Computer Systems, 2, 277–288. http://web.mit.edu/Saltzer/www/publications/endtoend/endtoend.pdf
  7. Spence, E. (2013, January 20). Why Orange’s dominance in Africa forced Google to pay for traffic over the mobile network. Forbes. http://www.forbes.com/sites/ewanspence/2013/01/20/why-oranges-dominance-in-africa-forced-google-to-pay-for-traffic-over-their-mobile-network/
  8. van Schewick, B. (2010). Internet architecture and innovation (pp. 72–75, 286–289). MIT Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andrew McDiarmid
    • 1
  • Matthew Shears
    • 2
  1. 1.GoogleCaliforniaUSA
  2. 2.Center for Democracy and TechnologyWashington, DCUSA

Personalised recommendations