Wireless Community Networks: Towards a Public Policy for the Network Commons?

  • Primavera De FilippiEmail author
  • Félix Tréguer


The history of communication technologies is populated with conflicts between centralization and decentralization. While many of these technologies started or have existed at some point of their development as a decentralized structure, often replacing older technological paradigms, nearly all progressively evolved into concentrated clusters of power as a result of industrialization and of the reaffirmation of state sovereignty, following a Schumpeterian process of “creative-destruction” (Wu 2010). However, when the needs of citizens turn out to be systematically overlooked in existing power dynamics, decentralized initiatives may emerge as an attempt to disrupt the dominant hegemony and allow for the democratic re-appropriation of technology—a process that the philosopher Andrew Feenberg calls “subversive rationalization” (Feenberg 1995).


Internet Access Wireless Community Network Telecom Operator Exclusive License Telecom Policy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Article 19. (2005). The legitimacy of license requirements for the use of wireless communications devices. Retrieved April 16, 2014, from
  2. Bauwens, M. (2005). P2P and human evolution: Peer to peer as the premise of a new mode of civilization. Ensaio, rascunho, 1.Google Scholar
  3. Benkler, Y. (2006). The wealth of networks. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  4. European Commission. (2012). Communication on promoting the shared use of radio spectrum resources in the internal market. Brussels.Google Scholar
  5. European Commission. (2013). e-Communications Household Survey (Special Eurobarometer No. 396). Brussels: EU Commission. Retrieved from
  6. European Commission. (2014a). Broadband access in the EU: Situation at 1 July 2013. Retrieved from
  7. Farivar, C. (2014, March 31). More Wi-Fi is better: FCC expands use of 5GHz spectrum. Ars Technica. Retrieved May 11, 2014, from
  8. Feenberg, A. (1995). Subversive rationalization: Technology, power and democracy. In A. Hannay & A. Feenberg (Eds.), Technology and the politics of knowledge (pp. 3–22). Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  9. La Quadrature du Net. (2011, May 11). EU Parliament Adopts Open Wireless Communications Policy. Retrieved May 12, 2014, from
  10. Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge: Cambridge university press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Shaffer, G. (2013). Lessons learned from grassroots wireless networks in Europe. In A. Abdelaal (Ed.), Social and economic effects of community wireless networks and infrastructures (pp. 236–254). IGI Global.Google Scholar
  12. Stoyanova, M. (2008). Competition problems in liberalized telecommunications: Regulatory solutions to promote effective competition. The Netherlands: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar
  13. Thatcher, M. (2014). European Commission merger control: Combining competition and the creation of larger European firms. European Journal of Political Research, 53(3), 443–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Wu, T. (2010). The master switch: The rise and fall of information empires. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CERSA/CNRS/Université Paris IIParisFrance
  2. 2.Berkman Center for Internet & Society at HarvardCambridgeUSA
  3. 3.School for Advanced Studies in Social Sciences (CRH/EHESS)ParisFrance

Personalised recommendations