Abstract
Neurons can exhibit many different kinds of behaviors, such as bursting, oscillating or rebound spiking. However, research in spiking neural networks has largely focused on the neuron type known as “integrator”. Recent researches have suggested that using neural networks equipped with neurons other than the integrator, might carry computational advantages. However, there still lacks an experimental validation of this idea. This study used a spiking neural network with a biologically realistic neuron model in order to provide experimental evidence on this hypothesis. The study contains two experiments. In the first experiment the optimization of the network is conducted by setting the weights to random values and then adjusting the parameters of the neurons in order to adapt the neural behaviors. In the second experiment, the parameter optimization is used in order to improve the network’s performance after the weights have been trained. The results illustrate that neurons with non-standard behaviors can provide computational advantages for a network. Further implications of this study and suggestions for future research are discussed.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Achard, P., Schutter, E.D.: Complex parameter landscape for a complex neuron model. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2(7) (2006)
Bohte, S., Kok, J., Poutre, H.L.: Error backpropagationin temporally encoded networks of spiking neurons. Neurocomputing 48, 17–37 (2002)
Bohte, S.M., Poutre, H.L., Kok, J.N.: Unsupervised clustering with spiking neurons by sparse temporal coding and multi-layer RBF networks. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. XX (2001)
Buzsaki, G., Geisler, C., Henze, D.A., Wang, X.J.: Interneuron diversity series: circuit complexity and axon wiring economy of cortical interneurons. Trends Neurosci. 27(4), 186–193 (2004)
Cohen, S., Intrator, N.: A hybrid projection-based and radial basis function architecture: initial values and global optimisation. Pattern Anal. Appl. 5(2), 113–120 (2002)
Fisher, R.A.: The use of multiple measurements in taxonomic problems. Ann. Eugenics 179–188 (1936)
Ghosh-Dastidar, S., Adeli, H.: A new supervised learning algorithm for multiple spiking neural networks with application in epilepsy and seizure detection. Neural Netw. 22 (2009)
Ianella, N., Back, A.D.: A spiking neural network architecture for nonlinear function approximation. Neural Netw. 14(2001), 933–939 (2001)
Izhikevich, E.: Simple model of spiking neurons. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. 14(6) (2003)
Izhikevich, E.M.: Which model to use for cortical spiking neurons? IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. 15(5), 1063–1070 (2004)
Izhikevich, E.M.: Dynamical Systems in Neuroscience: The Geometry of Excitability and Bursting. MIT Press, s.l. (2006)
Kampakis, S.: Improved Izhikevich neurons for spiking neural networks. J. Soft. Comput. (2011)
Kampakis, S.: (under review). ReSpiN: a supervised training algorithm for rebound spiking neurons. J. Soft Comput. (2013)
Kampakis, S.: Investigating the computational power of spiking neurons with non-standard behaviors. Neural Netw. 43, 41–54 (2013)
Keren, N., Peled, N., Korngreen, A.: Constraining compartmental models using multiple voltage recordings and genetic algorithms. J. Neurophysiol. 3730–3742 (2006)
Klausberger, T., Somogyi, P.: Neuronal diversity and temporal dynamics: the unity of hippocampal circuit operations. Science 321(5885), 53–57 (2008)
Maass, W.: Networks of spiking neurons: the third generation of spiking neural networks. Neural Netw. 10(9), 1659–1671 (1997)
Maul, T.: (in press, accepted manuscript). Early experiments with neural diversity machines (2013)
Meftah, B., Lezoray, O., Benyettou, A.: Segmentation and edge detection based on spiking neural network model. Neural Process. Lett. 32(2), 131–146 (2010)
Moore, C.I., Carlen, M., Knoblich, U., Cardin, J.A.: Neocortical interneurons: from diversity, strength. Cell 142(2), 189–193 (2010)
Potjans, W., Morrison, A., Diesmann, M.: A spiking neural network model of an actor-critic learning agent. Neural Comput. 21(2), 301–339 (2009)
Rawlins, G.J.E. (ed.): Foundations of Genetic Algorithms (FOGA 1). Morgan Kaufmann, s.l. (1991)
Taylor, A.M., Enoka, R.M.: Optimization of input patterns and neuronal properties to evoke motor neuron synchronization. J. Comput. Neurosci. 16(2), 139–157 (2004)
Tutkun, N.: Parameter estimation in mathematical models using the real coded genetic algorithms. Expert Syst. Appl. 36(2), 3342–3345 (2009)
Valko, M., Marques, N.C., Castellani, M.: Evolutionary Feature Selection for Spiking Neural Network Pattern Classifiers, pp. 181–187. IEEE, Covilha (2005)
Van Geit, W., De Schutter, E., Achard, P.: Automated neuron model optimization techniques: a review. Biol. Cybern. 99, 241–251 (2008)
Wade, J.J., McDaid, L.J., Santos, J.A., Sayers, H.M.: SWAT: An Unsupervised SNN Training Algorithm for Classification Problems, pp. 2648–2655. IEEE, Hong Kong (2008)
Wang, H.: Improvement of Izhikevich’s neuronal and neural network model. IEEE, Wuhan, China (2009)
Wu, C.-H., Tzeng, G.-H., Lin, R.-H.: A novel hybrid genetic algorithm for kernel fsunction and parameter optimization in support vector regression. Expert Syst. Appl. 36(3), 4725–4735 (2009)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Kampakis, S. (2016). Neurons with Non-standard Behaviors Can Be Computationally Relevant. In: Merelo, J.J., Rosa, A., Cadenas, J.M., Dourado, A., Madani, K., Filipe, J. (eds) Computational Intelligence. IJCCI 2014. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 620. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26393-9_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26393-9_20
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-26391-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-26393-9
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)