Who Killed the All-Electric Car?

  • Alice J. FriedemannEmail author
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Energy book series (BRIEFSENERGY)


Electric cars (EV) seem like the best thing since sliced bread. The liquid fuels they do not burn make more oil available for heavy-duty trucks, ships, and planes. It should not escape our notice that there are very few electric trucks and no electric ships or planes. Later in this book, we will explore those possibilities, but for now, suffice to say they are not so easily electrified (Long 2011).


Electric Vehicle Battery Pack Lithium Fluoride Battery Management System Vehicle Battery 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Borenstein, S. 2013. What holds energy tech back? The infernal battery. New York: Associated Press.Google Scholar
  2. DOE. 2007. Basic research needs for electrical energy storage. Report of the Basic Energy Sciences Workshop on Electrical Energy Storage April 2–4, 2007. Office of Science, U.S. Department Of Energy.Google Scholar
  3. Hillebrand, D. 2012. Advanced vehicle technologies; outlook for electrics, internal combustion, and alternate fuels. USA: Argonne National Laboratory.Google Scholar
  4. Hirsch, J. 2015. 253 million cars and trucks on U.S. roads; average age is 11.4 years. Los Angeles: The Los Angeles Times.Google Scholar
  5. Hiscox, G. 1901. Horseless vehicles, automobiles, motor cycles. New York: Norman Henley & Co.Google Scholar
  6. House, K.Z. 2009. The limits of energy storage technology. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists.Google Scholar
  7. InsideEVs. 2015. Monthly plug-in sales scorecard.
  8. LeVine, S. 2015. The Powerhouse: Inside the Invention of a Battery to Save the World Viking.Google Scholar
  9. Long, J. 2011. Piecemeal cuts won’t add up to radical reductions. Nature 478.Google Scholar
  10. Lowenthal, R. 2008. On the need for public charging. Coulomb Technologies presentation Plugin 2008 Conference. San Jose, CA.Google Scholar
  11. NAE. 2012. National Academy of Engineering. Building the U.S. Battery Industry for Electric Drive Vehicles: Summary of a Symposium. National Research Council.Google Scholar
  12. NAS. 2008. Sources and uses: what you need to know about energy. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.
  13. NPC. 2012. Chapter 13: electric advancing technology for America’s transportation future. Washington, DC: National Petroleum Council.Google Scholar
  14. NRC. 2013. Transitions to alternative vehicles and fuels. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  15. NRC. 2015a. Overcoming barriers to deployment of plug-in electric vehicles. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  16. NRC. 2015b. Cost, effectiveness and deployment of fuel economy tech for light-duty vehicles, 613. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
  17. Service, R. 2011. Getting there: better batteries. Science 332: 1494–1496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Shiau, C.-S.N., et al. 2009. Impact of battery weight and charging patterns on the economic and environmental benefits of plug-in hybrid vehicles. Energy Policy 37: 2653–2663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Smil, V. 2010. Energy myths and realities. Washington, DC: The AEI Press.Google Scholar
  20. Van Noorden, R. 2014a. The rechargeable revolution: a better battery. Nature 507:26–28.Google Scholar
  21. Van Noorden, R. 2014b. Nature podcast “Backchat April 2015” on Lin, M-.C.: an ultrafast rechargeable aluminium-ion battery. Nature 520:324–328.Google Scholar
  22. Wagner, F.T., et al. 2010. Electrochemistry and the future of the automobile. Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 1: 2204–2219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Zu, C.-X., et al. 2011. Thermodynamic analysis on energy densities of batteries. Energy and Environmental Science 4: 2614–2624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.OaklandUSA

Personalised recommendations