Skip to main content

Knowledge Sharing in Coalitions

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
AI 2015: Advances in Artificial Intelligence (AI 2015)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 9457))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to investigate the interplay between knowledge shared by a group of agents and its coalition ability. We characterize this relation in the standard context of imperfect information concurrent game. We assume that whenever a set of agents form a coalition to achieve a goal, they share their knowledge before acting. Based on this assumption, we propose a new semantics for alternating-time temporal logic with imperfect information and perfect recall. It turns out this semantics is sufficient to preserve all the desirable properties of coalition ability in traditional coalitional logics. Meanwhile, we also show that the fixed-point characterisations of coalition operators which normally fail in the context of imperfect information can be recovered through the interplay of epistemic and coalition modalities. This work provides a partial answer to the question: which kind of group knowledge is required for a group to achieve their goals in the context of imperfect information.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    It is worth to mention that [23] proposed a way to embed actions to a state so that the state-based equivalence can achieve the same meaning.

References

  1. Ågotnes, T., Goranko, V., Jamroga, W.: Alternating-time temporal logics with irrevocable strategies. In: TARK 2007, pp. 15–24. ACM (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Alur, R., Henzinger, T.A., Kupferman, O.: Alternating-time temporal logic. J. ACM 49(5), 672–713 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Belardinelli, F.: Reasoning about knowledge and strategies: epistemic strategy logic. In: SR 2014, pp. 27–33 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Belardinelli, F.: A logic of knowledge and strategies with imperfect information. In: LAMAS 2015 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bolander, T., Braüner, T.: Tableau-based decision procedures for hybrid logic. J. Logic Comput. 16(6), 737–763 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Bulling, N., Jamroga, W.: Comparing variants of strategic ability: how uncertainty and memory influence general properties of games. Auton. Agent. Multi-Agent Syst. 28(3), 474–518 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bulling, N., Jamroga, W., Popovici, M.: Agents with truly perfect recall in alternating-time temporal logic. In: Proceedings of AAMAS 2014, pp. 1561–1562 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chatterjee, K., Henzinger, T.A., Piterman, N.: Strategy logic. Inf. Comput. 208(6), 677–693 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Diaconu, R., Dima, C.: Model-checking alternating-time temporal logic with strategies based on common knowledge is undecidable. Appl. Artif. Intell. 26(4), 331–348 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. van Ditmarsch, H., Halpern, J.Y., van der Hoek, W.: Handbook of Epistemic Logic. College Publications, London (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  11. van Ditmarsch, H., Knight, S.: Partial information and uniform strategies. In: Bulling, N., van der Torre, L., Villata, S., Jamroga, W., Vasconcelos, W. (eds.) CLIMA 2014. LNCS, vol. 8624, pp. 183–198. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Goranko, V., Van Drimmelen, G.: Complete axiomatization and decidability of alternating-time temporal logic. Theoret. Comput. Sci. 353(1), 93–117 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Herzig, A.: Logics of knowledge and action: critical analysis and challenges. In: Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, pp. 1–35 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Herzig, A., Lorini, E.: A dynamic logic of agency I: STIT, capabilities and powers. J. Logic Lang. Inform. 19(1), 89–121 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Herzig, A., Troquard, N.: Knowing how to play: uniform choices in logics of agency. In: AAMAS 2006, pp. 209–216. ACM (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  16. van der Hoek, W., Pauly, M.: Modal logic for games and information. In: Handbook of Modal Logic, vol. 3, pp. 1077–1148 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  17. van der Hoek, W., Wooldridge, M.: Cooperation, knowledge, and time: alternating-time temporal epistemic logic and its applications. Studia Logica 75(1), 125–157 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Jamroga, W., Bulling, N.: Comparing variants of strategic ability. In: IJCAI 2011, pp. 252–257 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Jamroga, W., van der Hoek, W.: Agents that know how to play. Fundamenta Informaticae 63(2), 185–219 (2004)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Jamroga, W.: Some remarks on alternating temporal epistemic logic. In: FAMAS 2003, pp. 133–140. Citeseer (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kuhn, H.W.: Extensive games and the problem of information. Contrib. Theor. Games 2(28), 193–216 (1953)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Pauly, M.: A modal logic for coalitional power in games. J. Logic Comput. 12(1), 149–166 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Ruan, J., Thielscher, M.: Strategic and epistemic reasoning for the game description language GDL-II. In: ECAI, pp. 696–701 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Schobbens, P.Y.: Alternating-time logic with imperfect recall. Electron. Notes Theoret. Comput. Sci. 85(2), 82–93 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Thielscher, M.: A general game description language for incomplete information games. In: AAAI 2010, pp. 994–999 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Van Otterloo, S., Jonker, G.: On epistemic temporal strategic logic. Electron. Notes Theoret. Comput. Sci. 126, 77–92 (2005)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhang, D., Thielscher, M.: A logic for reasoning about game strategies. In: AAAI 2015, pp. 1671–1677 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Heng Zhang for his valuable help, and special thanks are due to three anonymous referees for their insightful comments. This research was partially supported by A key project of National Science of China titled with A study on dynamic logics for games (15AZX020).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guifei Jiang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Jiang, G., Zhang, D., Perrussel, L. (2015). Knowledge Sharing in Coalitions. In: Pfahringer, B., Renz, J. (eds) AI 2015: Advances in Artificial Intelligence. AI 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9457. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26350-2_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26350-2_22

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-26349-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-26350-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics