Advertisement

“Without Design, or Fate, or Force”: Why Couldn’t John Evelyn Complete the Elysium Britannicum?

  • Michael LeslieEmail author
Conference paper
  • 942 Downloads
Part of the Trends in the History of Science book series (TRENDSHISTORYSCIENCE)

Abstract

Despite living for 50 years after beginning his “Elysium Britannicum” in the 1650s, John Evelyn (1620–1706) failed to complete what was meant to be a masterwork on gardens. The exceptionally complex manuscript left behind was only published in a heroic edition by John Ingram in 2000. Why did Evelyn embark on the work and why didn’t he complete it? This essay suggests that the initial project developed in a uniquely unstable intellectual, religious, and political moment, in which Evelyn felt free to respond to neo-Epicurean physics and philosophy. As order returned, Evelyn found himself unable to accept the worldview implied by neo-Epicureanism but also unwilling to publish a revised version that denied conclusions his contemporaries were coming to accept. Evelyn’s response is contrasted with that of the plant anatomist Nehemiah Grew (1641–1712), who was also aware of the radical implications of neo-Epicureanism, but whose social and religious circumstances were markedly different.

Keywords

Royal Society Seventeenth Century Magnum Opus Intellectual Culture Patron Saint 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Bibliography

Sources

  1. Bacon, Francis. 1605. The twoo bookes of Francis Bacon. Of the proficience and aduancement of learning, diuine and humane To the King. London.Google Scholar
  2. Bacon, Francis. 1625. The essayes or counsels, ciuill and morall. London.Google Scholar
  3. Bacon, Francis. 1627. Sylua syluarum: or A naturall historie In ten centuries. Ed. William Rawley. London.Google Scholar
  4. Bacon, Francis. 1658. Opuscula Varia Posthuma, Philosophica, Civilia, et Theologica, Francisci Baconi…. Ed. William Rawley. London.Google Scholar
  5. Beale, John. Letters. British Library Additional Manuscripts 78313.Google Scholar
  6. Charleton, Walter. 1652. The Darkness of Atheism Dispelled by the Light of Nature. London.Google Scholar
  7. Charleton, Walter. 1654. Physiologia Epicuro-Gassendo-Charltoniana. London.Google Scholar
  8. Charleton, Walter. 1656. Epicurus’s Morals. London.Google Scholar
  9. Charleton, Walter. 1657. The Immortality of the Human Soul, Demonstrated by the Light of Nature. London.Google Scholar
  10. Evelyn, John. 1624. Sylva, or A Discourse of Forest-Trees. London.Google Scholar
  11. Evelyn, John. 1656. An Essay on the First Book of T. Lucretius Carus: De Rerum Natura. London.Google Scholar
  12. Evelyn, John. 1850. The history of religion. A rational account of the true religion. Ed. R. M. Evanston. London.Google Scholar
  13. Evelyn, John. 2001. Elysium Britannicum, or The Royal Gardens in three books. Ed. John E. Ingram. Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  14. Evelyn, John. Letterbooks. 2 vols. British Library Additional Manuscripts 78298-9.Google Scholar
  15. Grew, Nehemiah. 1682. Anatomy of Plants. With an Idea of a Philosophical History of Plants. London.Google Scholar
  16. Hartlib, Samuel. 1651. The Reformed Husband-man. London.Google Scholar
  17. Hartlib, Samuel. 2013. The Hartlib Papers. Eds. M. Greengrass, M. Leslie and M. Hannon. Sheffield HRI Online Publications. http://www.hrionline.ac.uk/hartlib.
  18. Hobbes, Thomas. 1651. Leviathan, or, The matter, form, and power of a common-wealth ecclesiastical and civil. London.Google Scholar
  19. Marolles, abbé Michel de (tr.). 1677. Les Six Livres de Lucrece De La Nature des Choses. 3rd edition. Paris.Google Scholar

Secondary Literature

  1. Bushnell, Rebecca. 2003. Green Desire: Imagining Early Modern English Gardens. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Darley, Gillian. 2006. John Evelyn: Living for Ingenuity. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Findlen, Paula (ed.). 2004. Athanasius Kircher, The Last Man Who Knew Everything. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Greengrass, Mark, Michael Leslie, and Timothy Raylor (eds.). 1994. Samuel Hartlib and Universal Reformation: Studies in Intellectual History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Hill, Christopher. 1972. The World Turned Upside Down: Radical Ideas During the English Revolution. London: Temple Smith.Google Scholar
  6. Hunter, Michael. 1995. Science and the Shape of Orthodoxy: Intellectual Change in Late Seventeenth-Century Britain. Woodbridge: Boydell.Google Scholar
  7. Leslie, Michael. 1992. The Spiritual Husbandry of John Beale. In Culture and Cultivation in Early Modern England: Writing and the Land, eds. Michael Leslie and Timothy Raylor, 151-172. Leicester: Leicester University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Leslie, Michael, and Timothy Raylor (eds.). Culture and Cultivation in Early Modern England: Writing and the Land. Leicester: Leicester University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Low, Antony. 1985. The Georgic Revolution. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Otten, Charlotte F. 1985. Environ’d with Eternity: God, Poems, and Plants in Sixteenth and Seventeenth Century England. Lawrence, KS: Coronado Press.Google Scholar
  11. Parker, Geoffrey. 2013. Global Crisis: War, Climate Change and Catastrophe in the Seventeenth Century. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Poole, William. 2004. The Early Reception of Paradise Lost. Literature Compass 1: 1-13.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Yale, Elizabeth. 2011. Marginalia, commonplaces, and correspondence: Scribal exchange in early modern science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 42: 193-202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.MemphisUSA

Personalised recommendations