Advertisement

The Art of Garden and Landscape Design and the Mathematical Sciences in the Early Modern Period

  • Volker R. RemmertEmail author
Conference paper
First Online:
  • 1.1k Downloads
Part of the Trends in the History of Science book series (TRENDSHISTORYSCIENCE)

Abstract

The mathematical sciences of the early modern period comprised many fields of knowledge, and those such as astronomy, geography, optics, music, practical geometry, acoustics, architecture and arithmetic were often deliberately oriented towards practical applications. Between the mid-sixteenth and mid-eighteenth centuries, practitioners of the mathematical sciences and garden and landscape designers shared the conviction that nature could be controlled and manipulated, and the methods used and the knowledge acquired in the mathematical sciences opened up new ways to do this. These potentialities affected the realm of landscape design and gardening in various formative ways that reached directly into the political sphere by offering new possibilities for political representation, of which there are numerous noteworthy examples, including the gardens of Versailles, perhaps the most magnificent representational gardens in seventeenth-century Europe.

Keywords

Seventeenth Century Mathematical Science Scientific Revolution Landscape Design Early Modern Period 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Bibliography

Sources

  1. Bacon, Francis. 1625. The Essayes or Counsels, Civill and Morall. London.Google Scholar
  2. Bettini, Mario. 1642. Apiaria universae philosophiae mathematicae. 3 vols. Bologna.Google Scholar
  3. Bettini, Mario. 1648. Aerarium philosophiae mathematicae. Bologna.Google Scholar
  4. Blondel, Jacques-François. 1747. Discours sur la maniere d’étudier l’Architecture, & les arts qui sont relatifs à celui de bâtir, prononcé par M. Blondel Architecte à Paris, à l’ouverture de son deuxième cours public sur l’Architecture, le 16 Juin 1747. Mercure de France 53: 57-73.Google Scholar
  5. Bosse, Abraham. 1648. Maniere universelle de M. Desargues pour praticquer la Perspective. Paris.Google Scholar
  6. Boyceau, Jacques. 1638. Traité du Jardinage selon les raisons de la nature et de l’art. Paris.Google Scholar
  7. Dézallier d’Argenville, Antoine-Joseph. 1709. La Théorie et la Pratique du Jardinage. Paris.Google Scholar
  8. Dézallier d’Argenville, Antoine-Joseph. 1711. La Théorie et la Pratique du Jardinage. The Hague.Google Scholar
  9. Diderot, Denis. 1999. Thoughts on the Interpretation of Nature and Other Philosophical Works. Introduced and annotated by David Adams. Manchester: Clinamen Press.Google Scholar
  10. Evelyn, John. 1879. The Diary of John Evelyn to which are added a selection from his familiar letters. 4 vols., ed. William Bray. London.Google Scholar
  11. Evelyn, John. 2001. Elysium Britannicum, or The Royal Gardens. Ed. John E. Ingram. Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  12. Groen, Jan van der. 1669. Le Jardinier Hollandois/Der Niederländische Gärtner. Amsterdam. [bilingual in parallel columns]Google Scholar
  13. Harris, Walter. 1699. A Description of the King’s Royal Palace and Gardens at Loo, together with a Short Account of Holland. London.Google Scholar
  14. Hesse, Heinrich. 1710. Teutscher Gärtner. Leipzig.Google Scholar
  15. Langley, Batty. 1728. New Principles of Gardening. London.Google Scholar
  16. Mandirola, Agostino. 1660. Manuale de’ Giardinieri. Vicenza.Google Scholar
  17. Manesson-Mallet, Alain. 1702. La géométrie pratique. 4 vols. Paris.Google Scholar
  18. Saint-Simon, Louis de Rouvroy de. 1857. Mémoires complets. Vol. XII. Paris.Google Scholar
  19. Schott, Gaspar. 1661. Cursus mathematicus. Würzburg.Google Scholar
  20. Stromer von Reichenbach, Wolf Albrecht. 1671. Der Italiänische Blumen- und Pomeranzen-Garten F. Augustini Mandirolae. Nuremberg.Google Scholar
  21. Switzer, Stephen. 1718. Ichnographia Rustica. 3 vols. London.Google Scholar
  22. Wolff, Christian. 1716 [reprinted 1965]. Mathematisches Lexicon. Leipzig [Hildesheim, Olms].Google Scholar
  23. Wotton, William. 16972 [1694]. Reflections upon Ancient and Modern Learning. London.Google Scholar
  24. Worshipful Company of Gardeners. 1700. Adam armed, or An Essay. Early English Books Online(EEBO).http://eebo.chadwyck.com/search/full_rec?SOURCE=pgthumbs.cfg&ACTION=ByID&ID=47682791&FILE=../session/1393007415_26152&SEARCHSCREEN=CITATIONS&SEARCHCONFIG=var_spell.cfg&DISPLAY=AUTHOR. Accessed February 19, 2007.

Secondary Literature

  1. Baridon, Michel. 2003. Histoire des Jardins de Versailles. Versailles: Actes Sud.Google Scholar
  2. Biagioli, Mario. 1993. Galileo, Courtier: The Practice of Science in the Culture of Absolutism. Chicago et al.: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bredekamp, Horst. 2012. Leibniz und die Revolution der Gartenkunst. Herrenhausen, Versailles und die Philosophie der Blätter. Berlin: Wagenbach.Google Scholar
  4. Clark, Ronald. 2010. Die Regeln des “Natürlichen”. Der konstruierte Landschaftsgarten bei Christian Schaumburg (1788-1868). Stadt + Grün 11: 39-44.Google Scholar
  5. Darley, Gillian. 2006. John Evelyn: Living for Ingenuity. New Haven et al.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Dear, Peter R. 1995. Discipline & Experience: The Mathematical Way in the Scientific Revolution. Chicago et al.: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. Eckert, Michael. 2002. Euler and the Fountains of Sanssouci. Archive for History of Exact Science 56: 451-468.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. Foucault, Michel. 1986. Of Other Spaces. Diacritics 16: 22-27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Garrigues, Dominique. 2001. Jardins et jardiniers de Versailles au Grand Siècle. Seyssel: Champ Vallon.Google Scholar
  10. Gaulke, Karsten. 2010. Experimentelle Naturlehre und Gartenkunst: Was haben Vakuumpumpen und Dampfmaschinen mit den Wasserkünsten zu tun?. In Hortus ex machina. Der Bergpark Wilhelmshöhe im Dreiklang von Kunst, Natur und Technik, eds. Sandra Kress and Jennifer Verhoeven, 156-166. Stuttgart: Theiss.Google Scholar
  11. Gorman, Michael John. 2003. Mathematics and Modesty in the Society of Jesus: The Problems of Christoph Grienberger. In The New Sciences and Jesuit Science, ed. Mordechai Feingold, 1-120. Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  12. Harris, Frances, and Michael Hunter. 2003. John Evelyn and His Milieu. London: The British Library.Google Scholar
  13. Harris, Steven J. 1995. Les chaires de mathématiques. In Les jésuites à la Renaissance. Système éducatif et production du savoir, ed. Luce Giard, 239-261. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
  14. Hunt, John Dixon. 2000. Greater Perfections. The Practice of Garden Theory. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  15. Hunter, Michael. 1998. John Evelyn in the 1650s: A Virtuoso in Quest of a Role. In John Evelyn’s “Elysium Britannicum” and European Gardening, eds. Therese O’Malley and Joachim Wolschke-Bulmahn, 79-106. Washington D. C.: Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection.Google Scholar
  16. Hyde, Elizabeth. 2005. Cultivated Power. Flowers, Culture, and Politics in the Reign of Louis XIV. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  17. Jong, Erik de. 1988. “Netherlandish Hesperides” – Garden Art in the Period of William and Mary 1650-1702. Journal of Garden History 8: 15-40.Google Scholar
  18. Jong, Erik de. 2000. Nature and Art: Dutch Garden and Landscape Architecture, 1650-1740. Trans. Ann Langenakens. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  19. Jong, Erik de. 2005. Of Plants and Gardeners, Prints and Books: Reception and Exchange in Northern European Garden Culture, 1648-1725. In Baroque Garden Cultures: Emulation, Sublimation, Subversion, ed. Michel Conan, 37-84. Washington D.C.: Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection.Google Scholar
  20. Knobloch, Eberhard. 1989. Klassifikationen. In Maß, Zahl und Gewicht: Mathematik als Schlüssel zu Weltverständnis und Weltbeherrschung, eds. Menso Folkerts et al., 13-40. Weinheim: VCH.Google Scholar
  21. Lauterbach, Christiane. 2004. Gärten der Musen und Grazien: Mensch und Natur im niederländischen Humanistengarten 1522-1655. Munich/Berlin: Deutscher Kunstverlag.Google Scholar
  22. Leslie, Michael. 1998. “Bringing Ingenuity into Fashion”: The “Elysium Britannicum” and the Reformation of Husbandry. In John Evelyn’s “Elysium Britannicum” and European Gardening, eds. Therese O’Malley and Joachim Wolschke-Bulmahn, 131-152. Washington D. C.: Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection.Google Scholar
  23. Mukerji, Chandra. 1990. Reading and writing with nature: Social claims and the French formal garden. Theory and Society 19: 651-679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mukerji, Chandra. 1997. Territorial Ambitions and the Gardens of Versailles. Cambridge et al.: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  25. O’Malley, Therese, and Joachim Wolschke-Bulmahn (eds.). 1998. John Evelyn’s “Elysium Britannicum” and European Gardening. Washington D. C.: Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection.Google Scholar
  26. Parry, Graham. 1992. John Evelyn as Hortulan Saint. In Culture and Cultivation in Early Modern England: Writing and the Land, eds. Michael Leslie and Timothy Raylor, 130-150. Leicester et al.: Continuum International Publishing.Google Scholar
  27. Phibbs, John. 2006. Projective Geometry. Garden History 34: 1-21.Google Scholar
  28. Remmert, Volker R. 1998. Ariadnefäden im Wissenschaftslabyrinth. Studien zu Galilei: Historiographie - Mathematik - Wirkung. Berne: Lang.Google Scholar
  29. Remmert, Volker R. 2004. Hortus mathematicus: Über Querverbindungen zwischen Gartentheorie und -praxis und den mathematischen Wissenschaften in der Frühen Neuzeit. Wolfenbütteler Barock-Nachrichten 31: 3-24.Google Scholar
  30. Remmert, Volker R. 2007. “Of a Gardiner, and how he is to be qualified”: John Evelyn, Gartenkultur und mathematische Wissenschaften im 17. Jahrhundert. In Revolution in Arkadien, eds. Berthold Heinecke and Harald Blanke, 23-37. Hundisburg: Kultur-Landschaft Haldensleben-Hundisburg.Google Scholar
  31. Remmert, Volker R. 2008. “Il faut être un peu Geometre”: Die mathematischen Wissenschaften in der Gartenkunst der Frühen Neuzeit. In Wunder und Wissenschaft. Salomon de Caus und die Automatenkunst in Gärten um 1600, ed. Gabriele Uerscheln, 51-58. Düsseldorf: Grupello.Google Scholar
  32. Remmert, Volker R. 2011. Picturing the Scientific Revolution: Title Engravings in Early Modern Scientific Publications. Philadelphia: Saint Joseph’s University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Remmert, Volker R. 2013. “and as we remember Kircher speaks of it”: Schriften jesuitischer Autoren als Quellen von John Evelyns Elysium Britannicum. In Landschaften – Gärten – Literaturen: Festschrift für Hubertus Fischer, ed. Irmela von der Lühe and Joachim Wolschke-Bulmahn, 159-169. Munich: Akademische Verlagsgemeinschaft.Google Scholar
  34. Romano, Antonella. 1999. La contre-réforme mathématique: Constitution et diffusion d’une culture mathématique Jésuite à la Renaissance (1540-1640). Rome: École Française de Rome.Google Scholar
  35. Schweizer, Stefan. 2012. Die Erfindung der Gartenkunst: Gattungsautonomie - Diskursgeschichte – Kunstwerkanspruch. Munich: Deutscher Kunstverlag.Google Scholar
  36. Seller, Vanessa Bezemer. 2001. Courtly Gardens in Holland 1600-1650: The House of Orange and the Early Hortus Batavus. Amsterdam, Woodbridge: Architectura & Natura Press, Garden Art Press.Google Scholar
  37. Stafford, Barbara Maria. 1994. Artful Science: Enlightenment Entertainment and the Eclipse of Visual Education. Cambridge (Mass.), London: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  38. Stehr, Nico. 1994. Arbeit, Eigentum und Wissen: zur Theorie von Wissensgesellschaften. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  39. Thomas, Keith. 2001. No High Heels in Paradise. London Review of Books 23: 21-22.Google Scholar
  40. Thompson, Ian. 2006. The Sun King’s Garden. Louis XIV, André Le Nôtre and the Creation of the Gardens of Versailles. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  41. Valleriani, Matteo. 2011. The Garden of Pratolino: Ancient Technology Breaks Through the Barriers of Modern Iconology. In Ludi naturae. Spiele der Natur in Kunst und Wissenschaft, eds. Natascha Adamowsky, Hartmut Böhme and Robert Felfe, 121-141. Munich: Wilhelm Fink.Google Scholar
  42. Vanpaemel, Geert. 2012. Jesuit Mathematicians, Military Architecture and the Transmission of Technical Knowledge. In The Jesuits of the Low Countries: Identity and Impact (1540-1773), eds. Rob Faesen and Leo Kenis, 109-128. Leuven, Paris and Walpole: Peeters.Google Scholar
  43. Vérin, Hélène. 1991. Technology in the Park: Engineers and Gardeners in Seventeenth-Century France. In The History of Garden Design. The Western Tradition from the Renaissance to the Present Day, eds. Monique Mosser and Georges Teyssot, 135-146. London: Thames and Hudson.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Interdisciplinary Centre for Science and Technology Studies (IZWT)Wuppertal UniversityWuppertalGermany

Personalised recommendations

Cite paper

Buy options