Advertisement

Reconstructing Order: The Spatial Arrangements of Plants in the Hortus Botanicus of Leiden University in Its First Years

  • Gregory GrämigerEmail author
Conference paper
  • 995 Downloads
Part of the Trends in the History of Science book series (TRENDSHISTORYSCIENCE)

Abstract

The University of Leiden featured one of the first botanical gardens north of the Alps, which was fully equipped in 1594. The first three persons responsible for the garden—Carolus Clusius, Dirk Outgaertsz. Cluyt and Pieter Pauw—had to distribute the plants and herbs into the different garden beds. The logic behind the spatial order they chose gives insight into various approaches on plant classification in the early modern period. It is possible to reconstruct and analyze the order of plants using catalogues from different years. These catalogues show the changes in the distribution of plants under the prefecture of several natural historians. The catalogues themselves are an interesting historical source, showing a way to transfer a garden and its plants into a printed counterpart. In the early modern period, the classification of plants was not yet strictly defined. Also, in the botanical garden of the University of Leiden, we do not find a single, stern systematic approach to ordering the plants, but rather a number of different ones. Plants were classified according to their virtues and to empirically comprehensible criteria, but also according to their beauty or even to the chapters of an herbal. The reconstruction of the distribution of the plants shows those different approaches to ordering the flora and casts light on the development of botany.

Keywords

Botanical Garden Early Modern Period Plant Classification Healing Power Ornamental Garden 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Bibliography

Unpublished Sources

  1. Cluyt, Dirk Outgaertsz. 1594. Index stirpium. Archief van Curatoren 1, shelfmark Ms. AC.1, Nr. 101, fol. 117A–T. Leiden: University Library.Google Scholar
  2. Pauw, Pieter. 1601. Hortus Publicus Academiæ Lugduno-Batavæ, eius Ichnographia, descriptio, usus: addito quas habet stirpium numero et nominibus. Leiden: Officina Plantiniana. For the handwritten inscriptions, see Leiden, National Herbarium, shelfmark HERBAR Folio room, copies for 1600, 1602, 1603, 1608, 1614 and 1628.Google Scholar

Printed Sources

  1. Brosse, Guy de la. 1636. Description dv iardin royal des plantes medecinales, estably par le roy Louis le Ivste, à Paris. Contenant le catalogue des plantes qui y sont de present cultiuées, ensemble le plan du jardin. Paris: s.n.Google Scholar
  2. Dodonaeus, Rembertus. 1608. Cruydt-Boeck: met biivoegsels achter elck Capittel, wtverscheyden Cruydtbeschrijvers: item in’t laetste een Beschrijvinge vande Indiaensche Gewassen meest getrocken wt de Schriften van Carolus Clusius. Leiden: Officina Plantiniana.Google Scholar
  3. Porro, Girolamo. 1591. L’Horto dei Semplici di Padoua. Venice: Girolamo Porro.Google Scholar

Secondary Literature

  1. Arber, Agnes. 1970. Herbals: Their Origin and Evolution. Darien CT.: Hafner.Google Scholar
  2. Barge, J. A. J. 1934. De oudste inventaris der oudste academische anatomie in Nederland. Leiden: Stenfert Kroese’s Uitgevers Mij.Google Scholar
  3. Boon, K. G. 1984. Samuel de Swaef to Jan Thesing (Hollstein’s Dutch and Flemish Etchings, Engravings and Woodcuts ca. 1450–1700, Vol. XXIX). Amsterdam: Van Gendt.Google Scholar
  4. Findlen, Paula. 2006. Anatomy Theaters, Botanical Gardens, and Natural History Collections. In The Cambridge History of Science, Vol. III, Early Modern Science, eds. Katharine Park and Lorraine Daston, 272–289. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Gelder, Esther van. 2011. Tussen hof en keizerskroon: Carolus Clusius en de ontwikkeling van de botanie aan Midden-Europese hoven. Leiden: Leiden University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Goldgar, Anne. 2007. Tulipmania: money, honor, and knowledge in the Dutch Golden Age. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Grämiger, Gregory. 2014. Verortungen von Wissen. Die Räume und Sammlungen der Universität Leiden 1575–1700. PhD-Dissertation ETH Zurich.Google Scholar
  8. Helm, Johannes. 1968. Das erste 1591 im Druck erschienene Bestandsverzeichnis des Botanischen Gartens zu Padua. Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte der heutigen Indices seminum. Die Kulturpflanze 16: 75–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Huisman, Tim. 2009. The Finger of God: anatomical practice in 17th-century Leiden. Leiden: Primavera Pers.Google Scholar
  10. Hunger, F.W.T. 1927–1943. Charles de L'Escluse (Carolus Clusius): Nederlandsch kruidkundige, 1526–1609. 2 vols. ’s-Gravenhage: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  11. Jong, Erik de. 1991. Nature and Art: The Leiden Hortus as ‘Musaeum’. In The authentic garden: A symposium on gardens, eds. Leslie Tjon Sie Fat and Erik de Jong, 37–60. Leiden: Clusius Foundation.Google Scholar
  12. Jorink, Eric. 2010. Reading the Book of Nature in the Dutch Golden Age, 1575–1715. Trans. Peter Mason. Leiden and Boston: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Meier Reeds, Karen. 1970. Botany in Medieval and Renaissance Universities. New York and London: Garland.Google Scholar
  14. Molhuysen, Philipp Christiaan (P.C.). 1913–1924. Bronnen tot de geschiedenis der Leidsche Universiteit. 7 vols. ’s-Gravenhage: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  15. Müller-Wille, Staffan. 2004. Ein Anfang ohne Ende: Das Archiv der Naturgeschichte und die Geburt der Biologie. In Macht des Wissens, eds. Richard van Dülmen and Sina Rauschenbach, 587–605. Köln, Weimar, Wien: Böhlau Verlag.Google Scholar
  16. Ogilvie, Brian W. 2006. The Science of Describing: Natural History in Renaissance Europe. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Rioux, Jean-Antoine (ed.). 1994. Le jardin des Plantes de Montpellier. Quatre siècles d’histoire.Graulhet: Odyssée.Google Scholar
  18. Swan, Claudia. 2005. Art, Science, and Witchcraft in Early Modern Holland. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Tjon Sie Fat, Leslie. 1991. Clusius’ garden: a reconstruction. In The authentic garden: A symposium on gardens, eds. Leslie Tjon Sie Fat and Erik de Jong, 3–12. Leiden: Clusius Foundation.Google Scholar
  20. Tongiorgi Tomasi, Lucia. 2005. Gardens of Knowlegde and the République des Gens de Sciences. In Barock Garden Cultures: Emulation, Sublimation, Subversion, ed. Michel Conan, 85–129. Washington D.C.: Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection.Google Scholar
  21. Tschira, Arnold. 1939. Orangerien und Gewächshäuser: Ihre geschichtliche Entwickung in Deutschland. Berlin: Deutscher Kunstverlag.Google Scholar
  22. Veendorp, H., and L.G.M. Baas Becking. 1938. Hortus Academicus Lugduno-Batavus 1587–1937: The development of the gardens of Leyden University. Harlemi: Ex typographia Eschedaiana.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ETH Zürich, Institut für Geschichte und Theorie der ArchitekturZürichSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations