Skip to main content
  • 364 Accesses

Abstract

The transition from the deconstruction of sovereignty as a fictional matter of arguable credibility to an empirical test of such a theorisation requires a methodological development. In order to assess the credibility of Swiss claims of state sovereignty in the frame of Swiss-EU bilateralism and to answer the research question, two hypotheses must be tested. Accordingly, it must be determined whether the formal presence of bilateralism and joint committees affects the credibility of Swiss claims of sovereignty as it applies domestically until proven otherwise. This comparative approach requires access to information provided by experts of the implementation of (1) domestic policies, (2) Swiss-EU bilateral agreements, and also (3) with joint committees. The latter constitutes the appropriate selective criterion to define the survey population that is to be approached through a questionnaire survey whose constitution respects methodological standards. In particular, the independent and dependent variables and the correlative dimensions and components are translated into the structure of the questionnaire as well as into the questions themselves. This follows the conception of items able to detect the presence of plurality of principals, path dependence, and functional/cultivated spillover and the possible Swiss sovereign/principal’s control over them as revealed by the experts. Through the use of snowball sampling a population of Swiss experts could be for the first time determined and reached and, by following the threefold structure of the questionnaire survey, factual data could be collected. The latter will allow us to test the hypothesis through a comparative approach applied to policy implementation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Semantically, it is worth distinguishing between non-direct and indirect Europeanisation. The reason is that non-directly Europeanised Swiss public policies (i.e. those without Swiss-EU bilateralism and joint committees) are not necessarily touched by the indirect Europeanisation phenomenon. Despite a general recognition of the idea that Switzerland could be the object of indirect Europeanisation of some of its domestic policies, some may complain that it may not a priori be assumed that either this is true, or that this is relevant for the credibility of the Swiss claims of state sovereignty. Therefore, it is more discreet to consider the Europeanisation of Swiss domestic public policies as a variable whose extremes are “non-directly Europeanised Swiss domestic policy” and “directly Europeanised Swiss domestic policy”. In the presence of formal agreements such as the BAs, it is possible to speak of direct Europeanisation. In contrast, the lack of formal agreements does not guarantee the presence of indirect Europeanisation (the autonomer Nachvollzug can for instance be by default reclaimed as a form of Swiss sovereign decision totally unrelated to any form of external influence). In essence, as explained in this chapter as in the previous one, indirect Europeanisation cannot be included in the calculus of state sovereignty erosion because it formally lacks proof that this indirect influence is not due to a fully sovereign decision.

  2. 2.

    See Kriesi on the relevance of direct democracy within the Swiss political system (Kriesi 1998: Chap. 4). Referring to Linder’s work (1994), Kriesi explains how the tools of direct democracy (i.e. the mandatory constitutional referendum; the optional referendum; and the popular initiative) represent a Swiss key-priority also influencing the worries concerning the Swiss accession to the EU (Kriesi 1998: Chap. 4). Following the vote on the “Stop Mass Immigration” popular initiative, this analysis is still valid.

  3. 3.

    For instance, the Swiss Constitution formally mentions sovereignty only when referring to the Swiss Cantons whose “sovereignty is limited by the Federal Constitution” (The Swiss Confederation 1999: Art. 3).

  4. 4.

    Luhmann’s analysis suggests that, in a Machiavellian moral perspective, lies are unavoidable in politics. Morality and politics constitute two different autonomous systems which cannot be used to understand one another (Luhmann 1994: 26, 28, and 35). This recalls the discussion on the credibility of sovereignty as a promise resting indeed on a match between an empty performative and its constative. Charlatan’s promises of sovereignty are not credible because empirically tested as vain, while the sovereign’s promises are credible because of their formal vagueness and consequent incontrovertibility.

  5. 5.

    For very similar criteria see also Babbie (2007: Chap. 9).

  6. 6.

    Babbie explains how “Respondents must be competent to answer – Respondents must be willing to answer” (2007: 243).

  7. 7.

    The problem of sensitive questions can be reduced or eliminated through the creation and pre-test phases of the questionnaire survey (Fowler 1995, 2009; Tourangeau et al. 2000; Sudman and Bradburn 1982; Barton 1958; Rothgeb et al. 2007).

  8. 8.

    An unsuccessful attempt to circumvent this difficulty and inductively determine a nominal list of Swiss implementers of BAs was made by studying the joint committees’ decisions published on the web (The Swiss Confederation 2011; European Union - EUR-Lex 2011). Indeed, two persons, respectively representing the Swiss and EU sides regularly sign the joint committees’ decisions. This information is, however, insufficient to determine the whole population of Swiss participants at joint committee meetings. Furthermore, no other documents (such as for instance the meetings’ minutes) were accessible.

  9. 9.

    In obedience to the anonymity and confidentiality criteria, these names are not mentioned. Indeed, “Participants should normally be given assurances (a) that their identity cannot and will not be divulged, and (b) that their answers will be treated in strictest confidence” (Buckingham and Saunders 2004: 85). The author personally guaranteed the respect of these two criteria at the time when the list of names was requested to the Swiss Integration Office and to the Mission of Switzerland to the European Union. Moreover, these 14 people could potentially become part of the participants responding to the questionnaire. The respect of anonymity and confidentiality thus already begins at this stage while defining the population.

  10. 10.

    “Sometimes we deliberately want to sample in a nonrandom way, not just for reasons of efficiency or cost, but because a deliberately constructed, nonrandom sample serves a purpose for our research. […] A purposive sample does not attempt to replicate the full population. Rather it draws subjects to maximize variation in the independent variable of interest, so that the relationships we are looking for will be very clear” (Shively 2011: 103). See also Creswell and Plano Clark (2011: 173–174).

  11. 11.

    A third kind of purposive sample that McCall and Simmons (1969) call deviant cases (Babbie 1989: 269).

  12. 12.

    Yet, these persons accepted the idea of distributing the questionnaire to their collaborators after a detailed explanation of the main purposes of the survey.

  13. 13.

    For some Chief Operating Officers, the confidentiality issue was not particularly relevant. Indeed, they mentioned their collaborators’ names during telephone calls or through e-mail correspondence.

  14. 14.

    Yet, we had to consider that the definition of the population through snowball sampling is just one phase of the operationalisation also covering many other methodological and instrumental choices. Moreover, “[…] the researcher must actively develop and control the sample’s initiation, progress and conclusion” (Faugier and Sargeant 1997: 792).

  15. 15.

    “Behavioral compliance can arise from two theoretically distinguishable sources. First, it can arise from individual-sanction-based control. Here an agent, such as a teacher, parent, or AIDS prevention counselor, targets an individual for control, for example, by promising a reward for a respondent undergoing an interview. The result is a dyadic relation of the sort presumed in most analyses of influence relations, a primary incentive. Second, compliance can arise from group-mediated social control (Heckathorn 1990). For example, respondents can be rewarded not only for their own participation in a study, but also for participation they elicit from a peer” (Heckathorn 1997: 177).

  16. 16.

    Evidence of the Chief Operating Officers’ concrete activism could be concretely verified in their effective help to distribute not only the questionnaire, but also the successive reminders.

  17. 17.

    Biernacki and Waldorf use the chain term as a synonym of snowball sampling: “Snowball or chain referral sampling is a method that has been widely used in qualitative sociological research” (Biernacki and Waldorf 1981: 141).

  18. 18.

    This concretely means that the number of respondents for a given joint committee simply depends on the number of participants. Since there is not a general rule or indication concerning the number of participants in each joint committee, it is impossible to a priori predict and quantify that participation.

  19. 19.

    During the fieldwork, the size of the sample reached through snowball sampling was totally unpredictable. Before the possibility of dealing with a final small sample, Waksberg suggests: “For small samples, it probably is worth the effort of stratification” (Waksberg 1978: 45). However, because of the exploratory nature of this survey referring to a population whose features still needed to be determined, such stratification was at any rate impossible.

  20. 20.

    In this example, there are four rounds of distribution indicated by the number of digits in the number of each individual (i.e. individual 1 was reached after the first round of distribution, while individual 1.3.1.1 was reached after the fourth). Each round of distribution implies that an individual having received the questionnaire could be compliant and also proceed in its further distribution.

  21. 21.

    Only two individuals, who were not Chief Operating Officers, suggested other names to contact. Only in one case was someone neither ready to participate nor to transmit the questionnaire.

  22. 22.

    This can be the case, for instance, when two Chief Operating Officers submit the questionnaire to the same individual because of her/his participation in more than one joint committee. However, even if some individuals could a priori participate in different Swiss-EU joint committees, their experience must be recorded just once.

  23. 23.

    The self-administered questionnaire is “the method in which respondents are asked to complete the questionnaires themselves” (Babbie 1989: 238).

  24. 24.

    The criteria are: cost; length of data collection period; response rate; quality of the database produced; and accessibility to respondents (Czaja and Blair 2005: 35).

  25. 25.

    Accordingly, there would be a “societal trend toward self-administration” (Dillman 2007: 7–8) based on the material advantages provided by this method of data collection, and also on the widespread use of new technologies (Dillman 2007: 7–8).

  26. 26.

    The work by Bartlett II et al. “describes the procedures for determining sample size for continuous and categorical variables using Cochran’s (1977) formulas. A discussion and illustration of sample size formulas, including the formula for adjusting the sample size for smaller populations, is included” (Bartlett et al. 2001: 43). Accordingly, depending on the size of the research sample, it becomes crucial to give the right weight to the proper techniques, making the statistical analysis reliable (to this end, see Cohen’s work and his effective Table I (1992: 157). As Tversky and Kahneman warn (1993: 343), the point therefore consists of taking due care of the different statistical implications of possibly dealing with a small rather than large sample.

  27. 27.

    See end of Chap. 4.

  28. 28.

    “Measurement, as practiced in the social sciences today, remains relatively haphazard and unsystematic, despite the efforts and exhortations of many distinguished scholars […]. The dominant approach is the indicator approach, in which social scientists seek to identify the best possible empirical indicators of their theoretical concepts” (Ragin 2008: 177).

  29. 29.

    Deltas could be positive or negative. In both cases the research hypotheses could be maintained. If there were no deltas, the research null-hypotheses could not be rejected. Positive or negative deltas will then determine whether directly Europeanised implementation of BAs and joint committees increase or decrease (or have an impact on) the presence of indicators of sovereignty erosion within C2 and C3 with respect to C1 to which the formalist (re)claim of organised sovereignty hypocrisy perfectly works and keeps intact credibility by default of factual counterevidence.

  30. 30.

    Accordingly, the “Study treats independent variables as parameters whose average effects can be estimated across the full population of cases” (Mahoney and Larkin Terrie 2008: 740).

  31. 31.

    LimeSurvey is an online survey software available at LimeSurvey.com (LimeSurvey 2011). Similar to what Creswell explains by referring to another online survey tool, thanks to LimeSurvey “researchers can generate their own surveys quickly using custom templates and post them on Web sites or e-mail them for participants to complete” (Creswell 2009: 149).

  32. 32.

    “Sometimes, a questionnaire will branch into different sections and respondents will be directed to one part or another according to how they answer a filtering question” (Buckingham and Saunders 2004: 83). Accordingly, thanks to the presence of three filtering questions, respondents not involved in at least one of the three distinguished institutional configurations could automatically move on to the next applicable section of questions. Moreover, the reiteration of three rounds of the same questions adapted to three different institutional configurations accelerated and simplified the understanding of the whole questionnaire. To this end, at the very beginning of the online survey, respondents could immediately read a brief introduction of the questionnaire structure and purposes, indicating that nearly 20 min were enough to complete it. This aimed to provide the respondents with clear instructions to facilitate their work (Babbie 1989: 150–152). Furthermore, additional instructions were added when moving from one section to another in order to “make sense out of the questionnaire for the respondent” (Babbie 1989: 151).

  33. 33.

    These questions – sometimes perceived by respondents as rather intrusive – are preferably put at the end of the questionnaire in order to avoid having people then refusing to answer the whole questionnaire (Babbie 1989: 151).

  34. 34.

    This exploratory study could therefore firstly profit from the existence of previous related studies from which it can draw inspiration. In addition, when applicable, a combination of both closed and open-ended questions was used. “Sometimes, a combination of both closed and open – ended questions works best. This involves providing respondents with a number of defined responses, and also an additional category (other) that they can tick if the response they wish to give is not listed. […] This combination of closed and open-ended questions is particularly useful in the early stages of research in an area, as it gives an indication of whether the defined response categories adequately cover all the responses that respondents wish to give” (Pallant 2010: 8–9).

  35. 35.

    “Measurement focuses on the crucial relationship between the empirically grounded indicator(s) – that is, the observable response – and the underlying unobservable concepts(s). When this relationship is a strong one, analysis of empirical indicators can lead to useful inferences about the relationships among the underlying concepts. In this manner, social scientists can evaluate the empirical applicability of theoretical propositions” (Carmines and Zeller 1979: 10–11).

  36. 36.

    There are four criteria to test the validity of a survey question: face validity, content validity, internal validity and external validity (Buckingham and Saunders 2004: 65).

  37. 37.

    Caporaso’s quotation confirms the idea that path dependence is not a priori erosive of state sovereignty, but could become problematic whether accompanied, for instance, by a lack of the sovereign/principal’s control over the appearance of external influences, such as those caught by the plurality of principals, or other forms of agency slippage already presented.

  38. 38.

    “Try to provide as wide a choice of responses to your questions as possible. […]. Don’t just ask respondents whether they agree or disagree with a statement – use a Likert-type scale, […]” (Pallant 2010: 9). As will be further discussed in Chap. 7, this choice also has positive implications concerning the subsequent statistical analysis: “This type of response scale gives you a wider range of possible scores, and increases the statistical analysis that are available to you” (Pallant 2010: 9).

  39. 39.

    See the “multiple-principals problem” determined by the competition between delegation to private and public sector agents illustrated by Mattli and Büthe (2005).

  40. 40.

    As explained, this logic applies except when there is a non-formally integrated institutional configuration such as C1, allowing the undeniable use of the until proven otherwise logic, making the sovereign/principal claims of sovereignty credible by default of counterevidence.

  41. 41.

    Indeed, it has to be here investigated “whether the states retain even last-analysis sovereignty to impose their will (or, indeed, to recover the competence and capacity to do so)” (Walker 2011: 99).

  42. 42.

    Special thanks for their relevant contributions to evaluate the questionnaire are addressed to (in alphabetical order) Dr. Samuele Cavalli, Prof. Matteo Gianni, Prof. Marco Giugni, Prof. Simon Hug, Dr. Damiano Matasci, Dr. Alessandro Nai, Dr. Francesca Pusterla and Prof. Pascal Sciarini.

References

  • Babbie, Earl R. 1989. The practice of social research, 5th ed. Belmont: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Babbie, Earl R. 2007. The practice of social research, 11th ed. Belmont: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, I.I., E. James, Joe W. Kotrlik, and Chadwick C. Higgins. 2001. Organizational research: Determining appropriate sample size in survey research. Information Technology, Learning, and Performance Journal 19(1): 43–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barton, Allen H. 1958. Asking the embarrassing question. Public Opinion Quarterly 22(1): 67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biernacki, Patrick, and Dan Waldorf. 1981. Snowball sampling: Problems and techniques of chain referral sampling. Sociological Methods and Research 10(2): 141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blom-Hansen, Jens. 2007. The Danish comitology survey technical report. Aarhus: Department of Political Science, University of Aarhus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blom-Hansen, Jens, and Gijs Jan Brandsma. 2009. The EU comitology system: Intergovernmental bargaining and deliberative supranationalism? Journal of Common Market Studies 47(4): 719–740.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blom-Hansen, Jens, and Gijs Jan Brandsma. 2006. Comitology in practice. Utrecht School of Governance, University of Utrecht, The Netherlands, and Department of Political Science, Aarhus University, Denmark.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckingham, Alan, and Peter Saunders. 2004. The survey methods workbook - from design to analysis. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnham, Peter, Karin Gilland Lutz, Wyn Grant, and Zig Layton-Henry. 2008. In Research methods in politics, 2nd ed, ed. B. Guy Peters, Pierre Jon, and Stoker Gerry. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Caporaso, James A. 1998. Regional integration theory: Understanding our past and anticipating our future. In European integration and supranational governance, ed. Wayne Sandholtz and Alec Stone Sweet, 334–351. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Carmines, Edward G., and Richard A. Zeller. 1979. Reliability and validity assessment, Quantitative applications in the social sciences, vol. 17. Newbury Park/London: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cochran, William G. 1977. Sampling techniques, 3rd ed. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, Jacob. 1992. A power primer. Psychological Bulletin 112(1): 155–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coomber, R. 1997. Using the Internet for survey research. Sociological Research Online 2 (2). Accessed 13 Apr 2011. http://socresonline.org.uk/socresonline/2/2/2.html.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, John W. 2009. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, John W., and Vicki L. Plano Clark. 2011. Designing and conducting mixed methods research, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Czaja, Ronald, and Johnny Blair. 2005. Designing surveys: A guide to decisions and procedures. London: Pine Forge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, Michael L., and Michael Ferrantino. 1996. Towards a positive theory of political rhetoric: Why do politicians lie? Public Choice 88(1): 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dépelteau, François. 2000. La démarche d’une recherche en sciences humaines: de la question de départ à la communication des résultats. Bruxelles: De Boeck Université.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillman, Don A. 2007. Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method. Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillman, Don A., Jolene D. Smyth, and Leah M. Christian. 2009. Internet, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method. Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, Mary. 1982. In the active voice. London/Boston: Routledge & K. Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egeberg, Morten, Günther F. Schaefer, and Jarle Trondal. 2003. The many faces of EU committee governance. West European Politics 26(3): 19–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Union - EUR-Lex. 2011. Access to European Union law. Accessed 10 Feb 2011. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm.

  • Faugier, Jean, and Mary Sargeant. 1997. Sampling hard to reach populations. Journal of Advanced Nursing 26(4): 790–797.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fink, Arlene. 2003. The survey kit: How to sample in surveys, 2nd ed. London: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, Floyd J. 1995. Improving survey questions: Design and evaluation. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, Floyd J. 2009. Survey research methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerber, Alan S., and P. Green Donald. 2008. Field experiments and natural experiments. In The Oxford handbook of political methodology, ed. Janet M. Box-Steffensmeier, Henry E. Brady, and David Collier, 357–381. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goertz, Gary. 2006. Social science concepts - a user’s guide. Princeton/Oxford: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goertz, Gary, and Harvey Starr. 2002. Necessary conditions: Theory, methodology, and applications. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, Leo A. 1961. Snowball sampling. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics 32(1): 148–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heckathorn, Douglas D. 1990. Collective sanctions and compliance norms: A formal theory of group-mediated social control. American Sociological Review 55(3): 366–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heckathorn, Douglas D. 1997. Respondent-driven sampling: A new approach to the study of hidden populations. Social Problems 44(2): 174–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hewitt, J. Joseph, and Gary Goertz. 2005. Conceptualizing interstate conflict: How do concept-building strategies relate to selection effects? International Interactions 31(2): 163–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann, Stanley. 1964. The European process at Atlantic crosspurposes. Journal of Common Market Studies 3(2): 85–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann, Stanley. 1966. Obstinate or obsolete? The fate of the nation-state and the case of Western Europe. Daedalus 95(3): 862–915.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hood, Christopher. 1999. Regulation inside government: Waste-watchers, quality police, and sleaze-busters. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • King, Gary, Robert D. Keohane, and Sidney Verba. 1994. Designing social inquiry. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kriesi, Hanspeter. 1998. Le système politique suisse, Collection Politique comparée, 2nd ed. Paris: Economica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Likert, Rensis. 1932. A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology 140: 1–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • LimeSurvey. 2011. Lime survey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linder, Wolf. 1994. Swiss democracy: Possible solutions to conflict in multicultural societies. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Litwin, Mark S. 1995. How to measure survey reliability and validity, The survey kit, vol. 7. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, Niklas. 1994. Politicians, honesty and the higher amorality of politics. Theory, Culture and Society 11(2): 25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, James, and P. Larkin Terrie. 2008. Comparative-historical analysis in contemporary political science. In The Oxford handbook of political methodology, ed. Janet M. Box-Steffensmeier, Henry E. Brady, and David Collier, 737–755. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattli, Walter, and Tim Büthe. 2005. Accountability in accounting? The politics of private rule-making in the public interest. Governance: An International Journal of Policy 18(3): 399–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCall, George J., and J.L. Simmons. 1969. Issues in participant observation: A text and reader. Boston: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarville, P. 2002. Second generation Irish identity in Birmingham. Unpublished PhD thesis. University of Warwick.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moravcsik, Andrew. 1991. Negotiating the single European act: National interests and conventional statecraft in the European community. International Organization 45(1): 19–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moravcsik, Andrew. 1993. Preferences and power in the European community: A liberal intergovernmentalist approach. Journal of Common Market Studies 31(4): 473–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moravcsik, Andrew. 1994. Why the European union strengthens the state: Domestic politics and international cooperation. Cambridge: Harvard University Center for European Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moravcsik, Andrew. 2003. Taking preferences seriously: A liberal theory of international politics. International Organization 51(04): 513–553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niskanen, William A. 1975. Bureaucrats and politicians. Journal of Law and Economics 18(3): 617–643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niskanen, William A. 2007. Bureaucracy and representative government. Chicago: Aldine De Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oppenheim, Abraham N. 2000. Questionnaire design, interviewing and attitude measurement. London: Pinter Publisher.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pallant, Julie. 2010. SPSS survival manual - A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS, 4th ed. Australia: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierson, Paul. 1996. The path to European integration: A historical institutionalist analysis. Comparative Political Studies 29(2): 123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollack, Mark A. 2002. Learning from the Americanists (again): Theory and method in the study of delegation. West European Politics 25(1): 200–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Presser, Stanley, Mick P. Couper, Judith T. Lessler, Elisabeth Martin, Jean Martin, Jennifer M. Rothgeb, and Eleanor Singer. 2004. Methods for testing and evaluating survey questions. Public Opinion Quarterly 68(1): 109–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ragin, Charles C. 2008. Measurement versus calibration: A set-theoretic approach. In The Oxford handbook of political methodology, ed. Robert E. Goodin, 174–198. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosamond, Ben. 2000. Theories of European integration. In The European Union series, XIth ed, ed. Neill Nugent and William E. Paterson. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothgeb, Jennifer M., Gordon Willis, and Barbara Forsyth. 2007. Questionnaire pretesting methods: Do different techniques and different organizations produce similar results? Bulletin de Méthodologie Sociologique 96(1): 5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saris, Willem E. 1991. Computer-assisted interviewing, quantitative applications in the social sciences. London: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sartori, Giovanni. 1970. Concept misformation in comparative politics. The American Political Science Review 64(4): 1033–1053.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitter, Philippe C. 2008. In Approaches and methodologies in the social sciences, ed. Porta Donatella Della and Keating Michael. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schweyer, François-Xavier. 2000. L’enquête par Questionnaire. Des contextes d’usage variable. In Les Méthodes au concret, ed. CURAPP. Paris: PUF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shively, W. Phillips. 2011. The craft of political research, 8th ed. Boston: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sudman, Seymour, and Norman M. Bradburn. 1982. Asking questions: A practical guide to questionnaire design. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Swiss Confederation. 1999. Federal constitution of the Swiss Confederation. Bern: The Swiss Confederation.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Swiss Confederation. 2010. Liste des comités mixtes Suisse-UE. In ed. The Integration Office FDFA/FDEA, Bern. http://www.europa.admin.ch/dokumentation/00438/00465/index.html?.

  • The Swiss Confederation. 2011. Recueil de textes juridiques sur les accords bilatéraux - Décisions des comités mixtes. Accessed 10 Feb 2011. http://www.admin.ch/ch/f/eur/gemaus.html.

  • Tourangeau, Roger, Lance J. Rips, and Kenneth A. Rasinski. 2000. The psychology of survey response. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, Amos, and Daniel Kahneman. 1993. Belief in the law of small numbers. In Handbook for data analysis in the behavioral sciences, ed. Gideon Keren and Charles Lewis. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Martine, Selm, and Nicholas W. Jankowski. 2006. Conducting online surveys. Quality and Quantity 40(3): 435–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Versluys, Helen. 2007. Explaining patterns of delegation in EU humanitarian aid policy. Perspectives: Central European Review of International Affairs 28: 63–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Versluys, Helen, and Jan Orbie. 2006. Theorizing EU humanitarian aid policy. Third Pan-European Conference on EU Politics, Istanbul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waksberg, Joseph. 1978. Sampling methods for random digit dialing. Journal of the American Statistical Association 73(361): 40–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, Neil. 2011. Surface and depth: The EU’s resilient sovereignty question. In Political theory of the European union, ed. Jürgen Neyer and Antje Wiener, 91–109. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiebel, W. Wayne. 1990. Identifying and gaining access to hidden populations. In The collection and interpretation of data from hidden populations, ed. National Institute on Drug Abuse. Washington, DC: U. S. Department of Health and Human Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeller, Richard A., and Edward G. Carmines. 1980. Measurement in the social sciences - The link between theory and data. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pusterla, E. (2016). Testing Swiss Sovereignty Credibility. In: The Credibility of Sovereignty – The Political Fiction of a Concept. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26318-2_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics