Advertisement

The Garfagnana Model for Exploiting Agrarian and Cultural Biodiversity: The White Garfagnina Sheep Breed, a Case Study of Sustainable Local Development

  • Francesca CamilliEmail author
  • Sandro Pieroni
Chapter
Part of the Environmental History book series (ENVHIS, volume 5)

Abstract

This work shows and discusses ten years of activities of the Union of Municipalities of Garfagnana to support the protection of local agrarian biodiversity in a sustainable rural development perspective. Such activities were based on the involvement of local community as the main protagonist of the process of development together with the coordination role of local institutions. The key elements of the success of the Garfagnana model was the exploitation of the multifunctionality of local resources and the diversification of local economies, taking into account both local knowledge on agricultural traditions and the contribution of research, as in the case of the white Garfagnina sheep breed attests.

Keywords

Biodversity Landscape Rural development Multifunctionality Diversification Biocultural diversity 

References

  1. Altieri MA (1995) Agroecology: the science of sustainable agriculture. In: Agroecology: the science of sustainable agriculture. Westview Press, BoulderGoogle Scholar
  2. Bacci L, Camilli F, Di Lonardo, Duce P, Vagnoni E, Mauro (2013) Neglected wools: fundamental steps to counteract the loss of potentially valuable materials derived from native sheep breeds. Hindawi Publishing Corporation conference papers in materials science, vol 2013, Article ID 402372, p 7Google Scholar
  3. Benvenuti S, Loddo D, Macchia M (2008) Biodiversità della “seedbank” di fitocenosi spontanee nella coltura del farro (Triticum dicoccum (Schrank) Schübler) in agroecosistemi della Garfagnana (Lucca) Ital J Agron/Riv Agron 1(Suppl):47–57Google Scholar
  4. Berkes F (2007) Community-based conservation in a globalized world. PNAS 104(39):15188–15193PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Brooks J, Waylen K, Borgerhoff Mulder M (2013) Assessing community-based conservation project: a systematic review and multilevel analysis of attitudinal, behavioral, ecological and economic outcomes. Environ Evid 2:2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brown K, Mackensen J, Rosendo S, Viswanathan K, Cimarrusti L, Fernando K, Morsello C, Muchagata M, Siason IM, Singh S, et al (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: policy responses. In: Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp 425–465Google Scholar
  7. Capistrano D, Samper C, Lee MJ, Raudsepp-Hearne C (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being, vol 4. In: Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Island Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  8. De Stefani C (1878) Delle proprietà comuni e dei limiti alle proprietà private in alcune parti dell’Appennino. In: Storia dei Comuni di Garfagnana. Riv. europea, IX, Modena, pp 115–126Google Scholar
  9. Di Fabio A, Palazzeschi L, Camilli F, Raschi A (2011) Interventi psicologici a sostegno dell’imprenditoria femminile: evidenze empiriche di efficacia nel contesto italiano (Psychological interventions to support entrepreneurship of women: Empirical evidence of effectiveness in the Italian context). Risorsa uomo 4:455–470Google Scholar
  10. Frankel OH, Brown AHD, Burdon JJ (1995) The conservation of plant biodiversity. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  11. Gadgil M, Berkes F, Folke C (1993) Indigenous knowledge for biodiversity conservation. Ambio, Biodiv Ecol Econ Policy 22(2–3):151–156Google Scholar
  12. Reid WV, Berkes F, Wilbanks T, Capistrano D (eds) (2006) Bridging scales and knowledge systems. In: Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Island Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  13. Salafsky N, Wollenberg E (2000) Linking livelihoods and conservation: a conceptual framework and scale for assessing the integration of human needs and biodiversity. World Dev 28:1421–1438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Scialabba NE-H (2003) Organic agriculture: the challenge of sustaining food production while enhancing biodiversity. Secretary Priority Area for Inter-Disciplinary Action on Organic Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy. United Nations Thematic Group, Sub-Group Meeting on Wildlife, Biodiversity and Organic Agriculture, Ankara, TurkeyGoogle Scholar
  15. Turchi B, Nuvoloni R, Fratini F, Pedonese F, Ebani VV, Cerri D (2011) Caciotta della Garfagnana cheese: selection and evaluation of autochthonous mesophilic lactic acid bacteria as starter cultures. J Anim SciGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Biometeorology, National Research Council, IBIMET-CNRFlorenceItaly
  2. 2.Unione dei comuni della GarfagnanaCastelnuovo di Garfagnana, LuccaItaly

Personalised recommendations