Skip to main content

Multidisciplinary Cancer Conferences

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Surgical Oncology Manual

Abstract

Multidisciplinary cancer conferences (MCCs) and multidisciplinary clinics (MDCs) are integral in the management of individual cancer patients to ensure that appropriate diagnosis and treatment options are considered prospectively. Common structural and functional elements including appropriate attendees are necessary to ensure a successful and well-structured MCC. Many studies have identified benefits of MCCs and MDCs which include, improved compliance with treatment guidelines, changes in treatment plans, improved survival, and increased patient and provider satisfaction. Through effective communication and input from multiple specialists, the most appropriate cancer treatment recommendations from the MCC or at the MDC can be discussed with individual patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. American College of Surgeons, Commission on Cancer. Cancer program standards. Chicago, IL: American College of Surgeons; 2012, released 2014. Available at https://www.facs.org/quality-programs/cancer/coc/standards.

  2. Australia C. Multidisciplinary meetings for cancer care: a guide for health service providers. Camperdown, NSW: National Breast and Ovarian Cancer Centre; 2005. Available at http://canceraustralia.gov.au.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Balmey R, Cataliotti L. European society of mastology (EUSOMA). The requirements of a specialist breast unit. Eur J Cancer. 2000;36:2288–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wright FC, DeVito C, Langer B, et al. Multidisciplinary cancer conferences: a systematic review and development of practice standards. Eur J Cancer. 2007;43:1002–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Department of Health. National Health Service: Manual for cancer services 2004. Topic 2A: The generic multidisciplinary team (MDT). London, UK: DH Publications; 2004. Available at: http://www.dh.gov.uk/publications.

  6. Gabel M, Hilton NE, Nathanson SD. Multidisciplinary breast cancer clinics. Do they work? Cancer. 1997;79(12):2380–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lamb BW, Sevadalis N, Vincent C, et al. Development and evaluation of a checklist to support decision making in cancer multidisciplinary team meetings: MDR-QuIC. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19:1759–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lamb BW, Taylor C, Lamb JN, et al. Facilitators and barriers to teamworking and patient centeredness in multidisciplinary cancer teams: findings of a national study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20:1408–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Conron M, Phuah S, Steinfort D, et al. Analysis of a multidisciplinary lung cancer practice. Int Med J. 2007;37:18–25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Pawlik TM, Laheru D, Hruban RH, et al. Evaluating the impact of a single-day multidisciplinary clinic on the management of pancreatic cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15(8):2081–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Yopp AC, Mansour JC, Beg MS, et al. Establishment of a multidisciplinary hepatocellular carcinoma clinic is associated with improved clinical outcome. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21(4):1287–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Chang JH, Vines E, Bertsch H, et al. The impact of a multidisciplinary breast cancer center on recommendations for patient management: the University of Pennsylvania experience. Cancer. 2001;91(7):1231–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Abraham NS, Gossey JT, Davila JA, et al. Receipt of recommended therapy by patients with advanced colorectal cancer. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101:1320–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Newman EA, Guest AS, Helvie MA, et al. Changes in surgical management resulting from case review at breast cancer multidisciplinary tumour board. Cancer. 2006;107(10):2346–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Santillan AA, Marzban SS, Crespo G, et al. Pathology review of thin melanoma and melanoma in situ in a multidisciplinary melanoma clinic: impact on treatment decisions. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(3):481–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Boxer MM, Vinod SK, Shafiq J, et al. Do multidisciplinary team meetings make a difference in the management of lung cancer? Cancer. 2011;117:5112–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Birchall M, Bailey D, King P. South West Cancer Intelligence Service Head and Neck Tumour Panel. Effect of process standards on survival of patients with head and neck cancer in the south and west of England. Br J Cancer. 2004;91(8):1477–81.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Forrest LM, McMillan DC, McArdle CS, et al. An evaluation of the impact of a multidisciplinary team, in a single centre, on treatment and survival in patients with inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer. Br J Cancer. 2005;93(9):977–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Burton S, Brown G, Daniels IR, et al. MRI directed multidisciplinary team preoperative treatment strategy: the way to eliminate positive circumferential margins? Br J Cancer. 2006;94:351–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Lordan JT, Karanjia ND, Quiney N, Fawcett WJ, Worthington TR. A 10 year study of outcome following hepatic resection for colorectal liver metastases: the effect of evaluation in a multidisciplinary team setting. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2009;35(3):302–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Brar SS, Provvidenza C, Hunter A, et al. Improving multidisciplinary cancer conferences: a population-based intervention. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21:16–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Stalfors J, Edstrom S, Bjork-Eriksson T, et al. Accuracy of tele-oncology compared with face-to-face consultation in head and neck cancer case conferences. J Telemed Telecare. 2001;7:338–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Gagliardi AR, Wright FC, Anderson MA, Davis D. The role of collegial interaction in continuing professional development. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2007;27(4):214–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Cancer Care Ontario. Multidisciplinary Cancer Conferences (MCCs): Disease site attendance criteria and patient discussion guidance. March 2010. Updated January 2014. Available at: http://cancercare.on.ca/common/pages/UserFile.aspx?fileId=63113.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Trevor D. Hamilton M.D., F.R.C.S.C. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 University of Toronto General Surgery Oncology Program

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hamilton, T.D., Brar, S.S., Look Hong, N.J., McLeod, R., Wright, F.C. (2016). Multidisciplinary Cancer Conferences. In: Wright, F., Escallon, J., Cukier, M., Tsang, M., Hameed, U. (eds) Surgical Oncology Manual. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26276-5_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26276-5_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-26274-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-26276-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics