Skip to main content

Reference for Interpretation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
ECOWAS Law
  • 489 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter briefly considers the Reference for Interpretation Procedure, which enables national courts in West Africa to refer issues bordering on interpretation of ECOWAS texts to Community Court merely for construction purposes. It sheds lights on when a national court is not bound to make such reference to the Community Court. Also, the chapter outlines the conditions for the application of the procedure, its importance, as well as the duty to refer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    2005, p. 51.

  2. 2.

    1991 as amended.

  3. 3.

    2012, p. 10.

  4. 4.

    Da Costa en Schaake NV v Nederlandse Belastingadministratie 1963, p. 31.

  5. 5.

    Article 247 TFEU 2008.

  6. 6.

    Case 283/81 CILFIT [1982], p. 3415.

  7. 7.

    Traghetti del Mediterraneo v Repubblica Italiana 2006, p. I-5177.

  8. 8.

    Article 10. Protocol on Court 1991.

  9. 9.

    Ibid.

  10. 10.

    Brooks (2006), p. 55.

  11. 11.

    Harris and Horspool (2008), p. 120.

  12. 12.

    1981.

  13. 13.

    1993, p. 1304.

  14. 14.

    Supra.

  15. 15.

    Defrenne v Sabena, 1976; Costa v Enel 1964; Van Gend en Loos 1963.

  16. 16.

    Harris and Horspool (2008), p. 119.

  17. 17.

    Supplementary Protocol.

  18. 18.

    Foto-Frost & Hautzollamt Lubeck-ost 1987, p. 4235.

  19. 19.

    Article 10(f) Supplementary Protocol.

  20. 20.

    Garner (2004), p. 1000.

  21. 21.

    Supra.

  22. 22.

    Article 265 Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

  23. 23.

    Ibid.

  24. 24.

    Kobler v Republik Osterreich 2003, pp. 10305–10307.

  25. 25.

    2005.

References

Law

  • Supplementary Protocol A/SP.1/1/05 amending Protocol A/P1/7/91 Relating to the Community Court of Justice

    Google Scholar 

Cases

  • Broekmeulen v Huisarts Registratie Commisie, C-246/80 6/10/81eu-lex.europa.eu/Lex Uri Serv/Lex Uri Servido? Uri=CELEX61980CJ0246:EN:PDF. Accessed 20 October 2013

    Google Scholar 

  • Case 283/81 CILFIT [1982] ECR 3415

    Google Scholar 

  • Case 28-30/62 Da Costa en Schaake NV v Nederlandse Belastingadministratie [1963] ECR 31

    Google Scholar 

  • Case C-173/03 Traghetti del Mediterraneo v Repubblica Italiana [2006] ECR I-5177

    Google Scholar 

  • Costa v Enel, C-6/64 15/7/1964 eu-lex.europa.eu/Lex Uri Serv/Lex Uri Servido? Uri=CELEX61964CJ0006:EN:PDF. Accessed 16 October 2013

    Google Scholar 

  • Defrene v Sabena C-43/75 8/4/1976 eu-lex.europa.eu/Lex Uri Serv/Lex Uri Servido? Uri=CELEX61962C00025:EN:PDF. Accessed 17 October 2013

    Google Scholar 

  • Foto-Frost v Hauptzollamt Lubeck- Ost, C-314/85 22/10/1987 eu-lex.europa.eu/Lex Uri Serv/Lex Uri Servido? Uri=CELEX61985CJ031:EN:PDF. Accessed 17 October 2013

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerhard Kobler v Republic Osterreich curia.europa.eu/jurist.jsf?language=en&num=C-224/01. Accessed 17 October 2013

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierre Corbiau v Administration des Contributions du Grand Duche de Luxembourg C-24/92 30/3/1993 eu-lex.europa.eu/Lex Uri Serv/Lex Uri Servido? Uri=CELEX61992CJ0024:EN:PDF. Accessed 19 October 2013

    Google Scholar 

  • Ugokwe v Federal Republic of Nigeria (2004–2009) CCJELR, p. 51

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Gend & Loos v Nederlandse Administratie Der Belastingen C-26/62 5/2/1963 eu-lex.europa.eu/Lex Uri Serv/Lex Uri Servido? Uri=CELEX61962CJ0026:EN:PDF. Accessed 17 October 2013

    Google Scholar 

Publications

  • Brookes I (ed) (2006) Chambers Dictionary, 10th edn. Chamber Harrap Publishers, Edinburgh

    Google Scholar 

  • Garner B (ed) (2004) Black Law Dictionary, 8th edn. Thomson West, Minnesota

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris S, Horspool M (2008) EU law (Subject Guide). University of London Press, London

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ukaigwe, J. (2016). Reference for Interpretation. In: ECOWAS Law. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26233-8_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26233-8_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-26231-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-26233-8

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics