Skip to main content

Right of Establishment (Services) and Free Movement of Capital

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover ECOWAS Law
  • 487 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter analyses briefly the right of establishment and free movement of services, as well as free movement of capital, under the ECOWAS legal regime. It distinguishes the right of establishment from right to provide services, justifies the distinction by drawing analogy with practices obtainable under the European Union law. It also evaluates the promotion, protection and transfer of capital under the ECOWAS Rules, together with action for failure to comply with these Community obligations on free movement of capital. The chapter rounds off with a brief comment on the existence of anti-integration legislation that would always affect the exploitation of the right of establishment and free movement of services within the territories of the Member States.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Pinheiro v Republic of Ghana 2012, p. 8.

  2. 2.

    Ibid.

  3. 3.

    Webster Dictionary (online).

  4. 4.

    2009.

  5. 5.

    1964.

  6. 6.

    1963.

  7. 7.

    Beale (1902), p. 501.

  8. 8.

    Merriam Webster (2015).

  9. 9.

    Factortame case 1990.

  10. 10.

    Gebhard v Consiglio Dell’ordine. Degli Avvocati e Procuratori di Milano 1995.

  11. 11.

    Harris and Horspool (2008), p. 275.

  12. 12.

    Article 1 Supplementary Protocol A/SP 2/5/90.

  13. 13.

    Article 3 (1) (2) (d). Revised Treaty 1993.

  14. 14.

    Ibid., Article 3(2)(d)(iii).

  15. 15.

    Revised Treaty 1993.

  16. 16.

    A/SP2/5/90.

  17. 17.

    Revised Treaty 1993.

  18. 18.

    Article 2 Supplementary Protocol A/SP2/5/90.

  19. 19.

    The Nigerian Voice (2014).

  20. 20.

    2012, pp. 8–9.

  21. 21.

    1990, PI-3905.

  22. 22.

    Case 2/74 Reyners [1974] ECR 631.

  23. 23.

    Case 154/93 Tawil-Albertini [1994] ECR I-451.

  24. 24.

    Apothekerkammer des Saarlandes v Saarland 2010, p I-4171.

  25. 25.

    Article 3 Supplementary Protocol A/SP 2/5/90.

  26. 26.

    Ibid.

  27. 27.

    Ibid., Article 4 (1).

  28. 28.

    Ibid., (2).

  29. 29.

    Ibid., (3).

  30. 30.

    Ibid., (6).

  31. 31.

    Article 7 Supplementary Protocol A/SP 2/5/90.

  32. 32.

    Article 4 (5) Supplementary Protocol A/SP 2/5/90.

  33. 33.

    Article 53 Revised Treaty 1993.

  34. 34.

    Law (2006), p. 85.

  35. 35.

    Staatssecretasris van Financien v Verkooijen 2000, p I-4071.

  36. 36.

    Hein Persche v Finanzant Ludenscheid 2009, pI-359.

  37. 37.

    Westdeutsche Landesbank 2001, p I-173.

  38. 38.

    Commission v Netherlands 2006, pI-9141.

  39. 39.

    Case C-367/98 Commission v Portugal 2002, P I-4731.

  40. 40.

    Fidium Finanz AG v Bundesanstalt fur Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht 2006, p I-9521.

  41. 41.

    Articles 8, 10 and 11 Supplementary Protocol A/SP 2/5/90, Article 53(2) Revised Treaty 1993.

  42. 42.

    Article 53 (2) Revised Treaty 1993.

  43. 43.

    Ibid., 3(a).

  44. 44.

    Ibid.

  45. 45.

    Ibid., (b)–(d).

  46. 46.

    Article 5 Supplementary Protocol A/SP 2/5/90.

  47. 47.

    Ibid., Article 8.

  48. 48.

    Ibid.

  49. 49.

    Ibid., Article 10.

  50. 50.

    Ibid.

  51. 51.

    Ibid., Article 11.

  52. 52.

    Ibid.

  53. 53.

    Article 10 (a) Supplementary Protocol Relating to Community Court.

  54. 54.

    2013.

  55. 55.

    Article 27 GIPC Act 2013.

  56. 56.

    Ibid., Article 28.

  57. 57.

    The Nigerian Voice (2014).

References

Legislation

  • Protocol (A/P1/7/91) on the Community Court of Justice as amended by Supplementary Protocol (A/SP.1/01/05

    Google Scholar 

  • Supplementary Protocol A/SP 2/5/90 on the Implementation of Third Phase (Right of Establishment) of the Protocol on Free Movement of Persons, Right of Residence and Establishment

    Google Scholar 

  • Revised Treaty 1993

    Google Scholar 

Cases

  • Brubaker v Deer &co 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 102419 (S.D. Iowa Oct. 16, 2009) available via http://definitions.uslegal.com/v/vested-right/. Accessed 21 June 2015

  • Cases C-171/07 and C-172/07 Apothekerkammer des Saarlandes v Saarland [2010] ECR I-4171

    Google Scholar 

  • Cases C-282/04 and 283/04 Commission v Netherlands [2006] ECR I-9141

    Google Scholar 

  • Case C-367/98 Commission v Portugal (Golden Share) [2002] ECR I-4731

    Google Scholar 

  • Case C-452/04 Fidium Finanz AG v Bundesanstalt fur Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht [2006] ECR I-9521)

    Google Scholar 

  • Case C-318/07 Hein Persche v Finanzant Ludenscheid [2009] ECR I-359)

    Google Scholar 

  • Case 2/74 Reyners [1974] ECR I-631

    Google Scholar 

  • Case C-35/98 Staatssecretasris van Financien v Verkooijen [2000] ECR I-4071

    Google Scholar 

  • Case 154/93 Tawil-Albertini [1994] ECR I-451

    Google Scholar 

  • Case C-464/98 Westdeutsche Landesbank [2001] ECR I-173

    Google Scholar 

  • Costa v Enel C-6/64 15/7/1964 eu-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServido? Uri=CELEX61964CJ0006:EN:PDF. Accessed 16 October 2013

    Google Scholar 

  • Gebhard v Consiglio dell’ Ordine degli Avvocat e Procuratori di Milano, Case C-55/94 via eu-/lex Uri serv/lex uri servi do?uri=celex 61994CJ0055:EN:pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinheiro v Republic of Ghana 2012 ECW/CCJ/JUD/11/12. www.courtecowas.org/site2012/pdf. Accessed 25 June 2015

  • Queen v Secretary of State For Transport, ex parte Factortame Ltd and others, Case 221/89 via eu-/lex Uri serv/lex uri servi do?uri=celex 61989CJ0221:EN:pdf. Accessed 20 October 2013

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Gend & Loos v Nederlandse Administrative Der Belastingen C-26/62 5/2/1963 eu-lex.europa.eu/LexUri Serv/LexUri Servido? Uri=CELEX61978CJ0148: EN:PDF. Accessed 17 October 2013

    Google Scholar 

Publications

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ukaigwe, J. (2016). Right of Establishment (Services) and Free Movement of Capital. In: ECOWAS Law. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26233-8_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26233-8_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-26231-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-26233-8

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics