Skip to main content

Conclusions

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Professional Practice and Learning

Part of the book series: Professional and Practice-based Learning ((PPBL,volume 15))

  • 904 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter pulls together the various arguments and insights presented through this book. It both zooms in on details relating to the Residential Unit of Karitane in Carramar, Sydney, and zooms out to consider wider implications in terms of professional practices and learning more generally. It begins by revisiting the four essential dimensions of times, spaces, bodies and things. These are then taken forward in a brief summary of the distinctive view of professional learning in practice presented in Part III. This articulates a view of practice and learning as entangled, but analytically separable. Emergence is then highlighted, before the functions and epistemologies of professional learning in partnership-based practices are revisited. This section highlights connecting and textural work, and sensitising and epistemic work. The final arguments to be revisited focus on the intensified pedagogic nature of practice based on partnership between professionals and service users. This is framed in terms of journeys into the unknown, and the need for distinctive concepts of pedagogy is explained. Concepts of nanopedagogies and pedagogic continuity are presented within this context. The chapter wraps up with reflections on the key questions posed in Chap. 1, and on theory and future directions for research on professional practice and learning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    I include in this a range of theories, including Cultural Historical Activity Theory (see Hopwood 2016), and diverse approaches of the kind outlined by Fenwick et al. (2011).

  2. 2.

    Here I am borrowing the phrase from Benadusi (2014).

References

  • Abrandt Dahlgren, M., Dahlgren, L. O., & Dahlberg, J. (2012). Learning professional practice through education. In P. Hager, A. Lee & A. Reich (Eds.), Practice, learning and change: Practice-theory perspectives on professional learning (pp. 183–197). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Abrandt Dahlgren, M., Hult, H., Dahlgren, L. O., & HÃ¥rd af Segerstad, H. (2006). From senior student to novice worker: Learning trajectories in political science, psychology and mechanical engineering. Studies in Higher Education, 31(5), 569–586. doi:10.1080/03075070600923400

    Google Scholar 

  • Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. London: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barad, K. (2013). Ma(r)king time: Material entanglements and re-memberings: Cutting together-apart. In P. Carlile, D. Nicolini, A. Langley & H. Tsoukas (Eds.), How matter matters: Objects, artifacts and materiality in organization studies (pp. 16–31). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Benadusi, M. (2014). Pedagogies of the unknown: unpacking 'culture' in disaster risk reduction education. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 22(3), 174–183. doi:10.1111/1468-5973.12050

  • Billett, S. (2014). Mimetic learning at work: Learning through and across professional working lives. In S. Billett, C. Harteis & H. Gruber (Eds.), International handbook of researching professional and practice-based learning (pp. 887–909). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billett, S., & Smith, R. (2014). Learning in the circumstances of professional practice. In S. Billett, C. Harteis & H. Gruber (Eds.), International handbook of researching professional and practice-based learning (pp. 733–757). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billett, S., Harteis, C. & Gruber, H. (Eds.). (2014). International handbook of researching professional and practice-based learning. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billett, S., Smith, R., & Barker, M. (2005). Understanding work, learning and the remaking of cultural practices. Studies in Continuing Education, 27(3), 219–237. doi:10.1080/01580370500376564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bovaird, T. (2007). Beyond engagement and participation: User and community coproduction of public services. Public Administration Review, 67(5), 846–860. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00773.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyle, D., & Harris, M. (2009). The challenge of co-production. London: New Economics Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clerke, T., & Hopwood, N. (2014). Doing ethnography in teams: A case study of asymmetries in collaborative research. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, H., & Day, C. (2010). Working in partnership: The Family Partnership Model. London: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day, C., Ellis, M., & Harris, L. (2015). Family partnership model reflective practice handbook. London: Centre for Parent and Child Support for South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and King’s College London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delamont, S., Parry, O., & Atkinson, P. (1997). Critical mass and pedagogic continuity: studies in academic habitus. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 18(4), 533–549. doi:10.1080/0142569970180404

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunston, R., Lee, A., Boud, D., Brodie, P., & Chiarella, M. (2009). Co-production and health system reform—from re-imagining to re-making. The Australian Journal of Public Administration, 68(1), 1–14. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8500.2008.00608.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, A. (2000). Looking at action research through lenses of sociocultural psychology and activity theory. Educational Action Research, 8(1), 195–204. doi:10.1080/09650790000200104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, A. (2005). Relational agency: Learning to be a resourceful practitioner. International Journal of Educational Research, 43(3), 168–182. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2006.06.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, A. (2010). Being an expert practitioner: The relational turn in expertise. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, R., & Nicoll, K. (2010). Action at a distance: Governmentality, subjectivity and workplace learning. In S. Billett, T. Fenwick & M. Somerville (Eds.), Work, subjectivity and learning: Understanding learning through working life (pp. 179–193). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engeström, Y. (2007). Enriching the theory of expansive learning. Mind, Culture and Activity, 14(1–2), 23–29. doi:10.1080/10749030701307689

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eraut, M. (2000). Non-formal learning and tacit knowledge in professional work. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 70, 113–136. doi:10.1348/000709900158001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evetts, J. (2014). The concept of professionalism: professional work, professional practice and learning. In S. Billett, C. Harteis, & H. Gruber (Eds.), International handbook of researching professional and practice-based learning (pp. 29-56). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenwick, T. (2008). Understanding relations of individual-collective learning in work: A review of research. Management Learning, 39(3), 227–243. doi:10.1177/1350507608090875

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fenwick, T. (2010). Rethinking the thing: Sociomaterial approaches to understanding and researching learning in work. Journal of Workplace Learning, 22(1), 104–116. doi:10.1108/13665621011012898

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenwick, T. (2012). Coproduction in practice: A sociomaterial analysis. Professions and Professionalism, 2(2). doi:10.7577/pp/v2i1.323

  • Fenwick, T., Edwards, R., & Sawchuk, P. (2011). Emerging approaches to educational research: Tracing the sociomaterial. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenwick, T., & Landri, P. (2012). Materialities, textures and pedagogies: Socio-material assemblages in education. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 20(1), 1–7. doi:10.1080/14681366.2012.649421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fenwick, T., & Nerland, M. (Eds.). (2014). Reconceptualising professional learning: Sociomaterial knowledges, practices, and responsibilities. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallant, M. H., Beaulieu, M. C., & Carnevale, F. A. (2002). Partnership: An analysis of the concept within the nurse-client relationship. Journal of Advanced Academics, 40(2), 149–157. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2648.2002.02357.x

    Google Scholar 

  • Ger, G., & Kravets, O. (2009). Special and ordinary times: Tea in motion. In E. Shove, F. Trentmann & R. Wilk (Eds.), Time, consumption and everyday life: Practice, materiality and culture (pp. 189–202). Oxford: Berg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gherardi, S. (2006). Organizational knowledge: The texture of workplace learning. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gherardi, S. (2009). Knowing and learning in practice-based studies: an introduction. The Learning Organization, 16(5), 352–359. doi:10.1108/0969470910974144

  • Gherardi, S. (2012). How to conduct a practice-based study. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Green, B. (2009a). Introduction: Understanding and researching professional practice. In B. Green (Ed.), understanding and researching professional practice (pp. 1–18). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, B. (Ed.). (2009b). Understanding and researching professional practice. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, B., & Hopwood, N. (2015a). The body in professional practice, learning and education: A question of corporeality? In B. Green & N. Hopwood (Eds.), The body in professional practice, learning and education: body/practice (pp. 15–33). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, B., & Hopwood, N. (Eds.). (2015b). The body in professional practice, learning and education: Body/practice. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grosz, E. (1994). Volatile bodies: Toward a corporeal feminism. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hager, P. (2011). Theories of workplace learning. In M. Malloch, L. Cairns, K. Evans & B. N. O’Connor (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of workplace learning (pp. 17–31). London: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hager, P., Lee, A., & Reich, A. (Eds.). (2012). Practice, learning and change: Practice-theory perspectives on professional learning. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodkinson, P. (2005). Learning as cultural and relational: Moving past some troubling dualisms. Cambridge Journal of Education, 35(1), 107–119. doi:10.1080/0305764042000332524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hook, M. L. (2006). Partnering with patients—A concept ready for action. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 56(2), 133–143. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.03993.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopwood, N. (2013). Ethnographic fieldwork as embodied material practice: Reflections from theory and the field. In N. K. Denzin (Ed.), 40th anniversary of studies in symbolic interaction (Studies in symbolic interaction, volume 40) (pp. 227–245). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hopwood, N. (2014a). The fabric of practices: Times, spaces, bodies, things. In L. McLean, L. Stafford & M. Weeks (Eds.), Exploring bodies in time and space (pp. 137–146). Oxfordshire: Inter-Disciplinary Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopwood, N. (2014b). Four essential dimensions of workplace learning. Journal of Workplace Learning, 26(6/7), 349–363. doi:10.1108/JWL-09-2013-0069

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopwood, N. (2014c). Using video to trace the embodied and material in a study of health practice. Qualitative Research Journal, 14(2), 197–211. doi:10.1108/QRJ-01-2013-0003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopwood, N. (2015). Relational geometries of the body: Doing ethnographic fieldwork. In B. Green & N. Hopwood (Eds.), The body in professional practice, learning and education: body/practice (pp. 53–69). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopwood, N. (2016). Expertise, learning, and agency in partnership practices in services for families with young children. In A. Edwards (Ed.), Working relationally in and across practices: cultural-historical approaches to collaboration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopwood, N., Abrandt Dahlgren, M., & Siwe, K. (2014a). Developing professional responsibility in medicine: A sociomaterial curriculum. In T. Fenwick & M. Nerland (Eds.), Reconceptualising professional learning: Sociomaterial knowledges, practices, and responsibilities (pp. 171–183). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopwood, N., Rooney, D., Boud, D., & Kelly, M. (2014b). Simulation in higher education: A sociomaterial view. Educational Philosophy and Theory, [online first]. doi:10.1080/00131857.2014.971403

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, K. (2012). The desire to learn: An analysis of knowledge-seeking practices among professionals. In K. Jensen, L. C. Lahn & M. Nerland (Eds.), Professional learning in the knowledge society (pp. 165–177). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, K., Lahn, L. C., & Nerland, M. (Eds.). (2012). Professional learning in the knowledge society. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemmis, S., & Smith, T. J. (Eds.). (2008). Enabling praxis: Challenges for education. Rotterdam: Sense.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knorr Cetina, K. (2001). Objectual practice. In T. R. Schatzki, K. Knorr Cetina & E. von Savigny (Eds.), The practice turn in contemporary theory (pp. 175–188). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre, H. (2004). Rhythmanalysis: Space, time and everyday life. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mäkitalo, Ã…. (2012). Professional learning and the materiality of social practice. Journal of Education and Work, 25(1), 59–78. doi:10.1080/13639080.2012.644905

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malloch, M., Cairns, L., Evans, K., & O’Connor, B. N. (Eds.). (2011). The SAGE handbook of workplace learning. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manidis, M., & Scheeres, H. (2012). Towards understanding workplace learning through theorising practice: At work in hospital emergency departments. In P. Hager, A. Lee & A. Reich (Eds.), Practice, learning and change: Practice-theory perspectives on professional learning (pp. 103–118). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Massey, D. (2005). For space. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mol, A. (2006). The logic of care. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulcahy, D. (2012). Assembling the ‘accomplished’ teacher: The performativity and politics of professional teaching standards. In T. Fenwick & R. Edwards (Eds.), Researching education through actor-network theory (pp. 78–96). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Nerland, M., & Jensen, K. (2012). Epistemic practices and object relations in professional work. Journal of Education and Work, 25(1), 101–120. doi:10.1080/13639080.2012.644909

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nerland, M., & Jensen, K. (2014). Changing cultures of knowledge and professional learning. In S. Billett, C. Harteis & H. Gruber (Eds.), International handbook of researching professional and practice-based learning (pp. 611–640). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicolini, D. (2009). Zooming in and out: Studying practices by switching lenses and trailing connections. Organization Studies, 30(12), 1391–1418. doi:10.1177/0170840609349875

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicolini, D. (2012). Practice theory, work, and organization: An introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nimmo, G. (2014, 25–27 June). Materialities of handover in intensive care. Paper presented at the ProPEL international conference—professional matters: Materialities and virtualities of professional learning, Stirling.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nyström, S., Dahlberg, J., Hult, H., & Abrandt Dahlgren, M. (2014, 25–27 June). Crossing locations of enacting and observing simulations: Ways of constructing interprofessional learning. Paper presented at the second international ProPEL conference ‘Professional matters: Materialities and virtualities of professional learning’, Stirling.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reich, A., & Hager, P. (2014). Problematising practice, learning and change: Practice-theory perspectives on professional learning. Journal of Workplace Learning, 26(6/7), 418–431. doi:10.1108/JWL-02-2014-0016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schatzki, T. R. (1996). Social practices: A Wittgensteinian approach to human activity and the social. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schatzki, T. R. (2002). The site of the social: A philosophical account of the constitution of social life and change. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schatzki, T. R. (2006). On organizations as they happen. Organization Studies, 27(12), 1863–1873. doi:10.1177/0170840606071942

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schatzki, T. R. (2010). The timespace of human activity: On performance, society, and history as indeterminate teleological events. Lanham, MD: Lexington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schatzki, T. R. (2012). A primer on practices. In J. Higgs, R. Barnett, S. Billett, M. Hutchings & F. Trede (Eds.), Practice-based education: Perspectives and strategies (pp. 13–26). Rotterdam: Sense.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: knowledge and growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14. doi:10.3102/0013189X015002004

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, N. (2007). Reality bites: Bringing the ‘real’ world of work into educational classrooms. In M. Osborne, M. Houston & N. Toman (Eds.), The pedagogy of lifelong learning: Understanding effective teaching and learning in diverse contexts (pp. 115–126). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thrift, N. (2007). Non-representational theory: Space, politics, affect. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zukas, M., & Kilminster, S. (2012). Learning to practise, practising to learn: doctors’ transitions to new levels of responsibility. In P. Hager, A. Lee & A. Reich (Eds.), Practice, learning and change: Practice-theory perspectives on professional learning (pp. 119–213). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nick Hopwood .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hopwood, N. (2016). Conclusions. In: Professional Practice and Learning. Professional and Practice-based Learning, vol 15. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26164-5_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26164-5_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-26162-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-26164-5

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics