Skip to main content

Opinion Analysis in Social Networks Using Antonym Concepts on Graphs

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Future Data and Security Engineering (FDSE 2015)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 9446))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 862 Accesses

Abstract

In sentiment analysis a text is usually classified as positive, negative or neutral; in this work we propose a method for obtaining the relatedness or similarity that an opinion about a particular subject has with regard to a pair of antonym concepts. In this way, a particular opinion is analyzed in terms of a set of features that can vary depending on the field of interest. With our method, it is possible, for example, to determine the balance of honesty, cleanliness, interestingness, or expensiveness that is expressed in an opinion. We used the standard similarity measures Hirst-St-Onge, Jiang-Conrath and Resnik from WordNet; however, finding that these measures are not well-suitable for working with all Parts-of-Speech, we additionally proposed a new measure based on graphs, to properly handle adjectives. We validated our results with a survey to a sample of 20 individuals, obtaining a precision above 82 % with our method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Pang, B., Lee, L., Vaithyanathan, S.: Thumbs up? Sentiment classification using machine learning techniques. In: EMNLP-2002, pp. 79–86 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bermingham, A., Smeaton, A.: Classifying sentiment in microblogs: is brevity and advantage? In: ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Agarwal, A., Xie, B., Vovsha, I., Rambow, O., Passonneau, R.: Sentiment analysis of Twitter data. In: Proceedings of ACL Workshop on Languages in Social Media, pp. 30–38 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kouloumpis, E., Wilson, T., Moore, J.: Twitter sentiment analysis: the good the bad and the omg. In: Proceedings of the ICWSM 2011 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Peng, Q., Zhao, L., Yu, Y., Fang, W.: A new measure of word semantic similarity based on WordNet hierarchy and DAG theory. In: International Conference on Web Information Systems and Mining, Shanghai, China (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  6. McCarthy, D., Koeling, R., Weeds, J., Carroll, J.: Unsupervised acquisition of predominant word senses. Comput. Linguist. 33(4), 553–590 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hirst, G., St-Onge, D.: Lexical chains as representation of context for the detection and correction of malapropisms. In: Fellbaum, C. (ed.) WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database, Chap. 13, pp. 305–332. The MIT Press, Cambridge (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jiang, J.J., Conrath, D.W.: Semantic similarity based on corpus statistics and lexical taxonomy. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Research in Computational Linguistics, Taiwan, pp. 19–33 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Resnik, P.: Using information content to evaluate semantic similarity in a taxonomy. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Montréal, Québec (1995)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hiram Calvo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Calvo, H. (2015). Opinion Analysis in Social Networks Using Antonym Concepts on Graphs. In: Dang, T., Wagner, R., Küng, J., Thoai, N., Takizawa, M., Neuhold, E. (eds) Future Data and Security Engineering. FDSE 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9446. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26135-5_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26135-5_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-26134-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-26135-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics