Skip to main content

Re-visiting Three Neighbourhoods of Modern Tehran: Chaharsad-Dastgah, Narmak and Nazi-Abad

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Urban Change in Iran

Part of the book series: The Urban Book Series ((UBS))

  • 1072 Accesses

Abstract

In 1945 the municipality of Tehran planned for the first time the development of large-scale Residential Neighbourhood projects. Over-population, increasing rents and land prices in central Tehran made de-centralisation and expansion necessary. With the approval of the first seven-year development plan in 1948, the construction of ‘Low-Cost Housing’ got a prominent place on the development agenda (Planning Organisation, implementation report of second socio-economy development, 1964). The ‘Rahni Bank’ [Mortgage Bank] was appointed by the Tehran Municipality as the executive organisation for low-cost housing projects. The organisation included young Iranian architects with European training and new ideas for the creation of a modern Tehran and adhering to the credo of modernist urbanism. The first modernist residential neighbourhood ‘Chaharsad-Dastgah’ was built in 1946 for government employees. As in so many (official) discourses (worldwide) of the time a lot of emphasis goes to efforts to attain affordable prices, what was supposedly related to materials, economy of scale, modern techniques and middle-class as a target group. In 1952, the new cabinet approved the construction of two large townships, respectively, Narmak in the north-east and Nazi-Abad fields in the south of Tehran. In Narmak and Nazi-Abad designs, the challenges of modern and traditional life style were clearly seen. As such, their development histories (conception, implementation, reception and appropriation) are crucial to understand the metamorphosis of Tehran from a traditional city into a modern metropolis. The present chapter attempts to shed light on these development histories as a particular case study that articulates the specificity of Iranian modernism and modernisation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In 1948 Ali Sadegh and Iraj Moshiri from AIAD and Iraj Shams from Tehran Municipality attended to International Union of Architect (UIA) congress in Lausanne, Swiss.

  2. 2.

    For example the CIAM conference on minimum housing.

  3. 3.

    Labor minister of France from 1 June 1928 till 2 March 1930.

  4. 4.

    Ditch lands were part of municipality’s properties.

  5. 5.

    Only in 1965 law of apartment possession was approved by the parliament, before that possession of land has recognition.

  6. 6.

    Rooms traditionally in Iran had different functions during day and night. Used as living and dining rooms during days and sleeping space during nights.

  7. 7.

    Planning Organisation report of implementation of First Seven-Year plan, 1964, Part I, the Municipal Civil Actions.

  8. 8.

    According to law, article 27, dead lands are the arid, anhydrous and dry and out of use which are not usable for agriculture. The concept of dead lands has religious roots: according to Islam and religious books, non-agricultural lands should consider as public benefits and only if private owner revive dead land as housing or orchards can have ownership of the land (Nasrollah 1955).

  9. 9.

    Before approval of the law of ‘Apartment Possession’ in 1965, Iran had Land Possession Law, which means most of estate housing before 1965 was made as single house typology.

  10. 10.

    Popular bricks belonging to 40s, 50s.

  11. 11.

    Lack of supervision from Bank-e-Sakhtemani and failure in accurate and precise implementation of housings (wrong material in places, mistakes in limits of lands and building location towards streets) and other technical problems like displacement of staircases to the roof, miscalculation of wall heights and shortening of roofs (Sarafian 1960: 18).

Abbreviations

AIAD:

The Association of Iranian Architects-Diploma

References

  • Adjdari A (1946a) Housing problems in Tehran and other Iranian cities. Architect J 1(1):15–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Adjdari A (1946b) Housing problems in Tehran and other Iranian cities. Architect J 2(1):51–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Adjdari A (1947) Construction of low-cost housings in Iran. Architect J 4(1):125–133

    Google Scholar 

  • Adjdari A (1956) Elements in Narmak and Nazi-Abad proposal. Bank-e-Sakhtemani J 4(1):21–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Habibi R (2015) Tehran Middle Class Housing 1945–1979, Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Leuven

    Google Scholar 

  • Habibi M, Ahari Z, Emami R (2011) From demolishing fortifications to thoughts of highways: history of urban design in Tehran from 1930 till 1966. Soffeh J 50(20):51–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Habibi M, Hourcade B (2005) Atlas of Tehran metropolis. Pardazesh va Barnamerizi-e Shahri Press, Tehran

    Google Scholar 

  • Haj-Dayi A (1955) Narmak Museum. Bank-e-Sakhtemani J 2(1):28

    Google Scholar 

  • Hovanesian V (1946) Architecture problems in Iran. Architect J 1(1):4–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Hovanesian V (1947) Architecture problems in Iran II. Architect J 2(1):24–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Isenstadt S, Rizivi K (2008) Modernism and Middle East: architecture and politics in the twentieth century. University of Washington Press, Seattle and London

    Google Scholar 

  • Khoursand M (1946) Association of Iranian architects. Architect J 1(1):3

    Google Scholar 

  • Khoursand M (1947) 400 units low-cost housings. Architect J 4(1):134–135

    Google Scholar 

  • Khodayar M (1955a) How Narmak was made. Bank-e-Sakhtemani J 2(1):7–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Khodayar M (1955b) Division of lands is not a solution for homelessness. Bank-e-Sakhtemani J 2(1):21–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Khodayar M (1957) The first 5 rooms house made by Kalad system. Bank-e-Sakhtemani J 6(1):11–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Maleki M (1955) Nazi-Abad. Bank-e-Sakhtemani J 2(1):39–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Moeenfar M (1955) Housing brawl? Bank-e-Sakhtemani J 2(1):31–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Moshiri I (1946) Our goal. Architect J 1(1):1–2

    Google Scholar 

  • Nasrollah K (1955) J Bank-e-Sakhtemani 1(1)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pirnia M-K (1955) Traditional Iranian housing. Bank-e-Sakhtemani J 2(1):6–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarafian M (1960) Overview of housings. Bank-e-Sakhtemani J 2(2):16–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheibani MA (1946) Appearance of low-cost housings in Iran. Architect J 1(1):28

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rana Habibi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Habibi, R., De Meulder, B., Habibi, S.M. (2016). Re-visiting Three Neighbourhoods of Modern Tehran: Chaharsad-Dastgah, Narmak and Nazi-Abad. In: Arefian, F., Moeini, S. (eds) Urban Change in Iran. The Urban Book Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26115-7_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics