Advertisement

EMI: Engineering and Management Integrator

  • Michael MasinEmail author
  • Yael Dubinsky
  • Michal Iluz
  • Evgeny Shindin
  • Abraham Shtub
Conference paper

Abstract

The impact of systems engineering on program cost has been recognized for over a decade. From the very early stages, careful management of the relationships between the product design and the project plan is crucial to the success of any project that aims to deliver a defined product. Failure to closely manage the intricate web of resource constraints emanating from the two domains, the project scope and the product scope may lead to inadequate product performance or overruns in project schedule and budget. Identifying and managing the relationship between these two domains are at the heart of our challenge to combine project management (PM) and systems engineering (SE). We present a new approach, called EMI, which integrates SE and PM methodologies. These include the EMI mathematical foundation, implementation in architectural optimization and project management tools, and a detailed use case for development of the Doors Management System for commercial aircraft.

Keywords

Project Management Pareto Optimal Solution Pareto Frontier Architectural Optimization Commercial Aircraft 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    DAU, Systems Engineering, Defense Acquisition Guidebook, Chapter 4, Defense Acquisition University, 2006, http://akss.dau.mil/dag/GuideBook/PDFs/Chapter_4.pdf
  2. 2.
    Sage, A.P., Rouse, W.B. (eds.): Handbook of Systems Engineering and Management, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York (2009)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Forsberg, K., Mooz, H.: The relationship of system engineering to the project cycle. In: NCOSE and ASEM (1991)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gulati, R.K., Eppinger, S.D.: The coupling of product architecture and organizational structure decisions. In: Working Paper. MIT (1996)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sosa, M.E., Eppinger, S.D., Rowles, C.M.: Identifying modular and integrative systems and their impact on design team interactions. In: Jof Mechanical Design (2003)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cataldo, M., Herbsleb, J.D., Carley, K.M.: Socio-technical congruence: a framework for assessing the impact of technical and work dependencies on software development productivity. In: 2nd ACM-IEEE International Symposium on ESEM (2008)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    MacCormack, A., Baldwin, C., Rusnak, J.: Exploring the duality between product and organizational architectures. Res. Policy (2012)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Avnet, M.S.: Information flow, team coordination, and shared knowledge in integrated concurrent engineering. In: INCOSE (2014)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Project Management Institute: PMBOK® Guide, 5th edn (2013)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Schwindt, C., Zimmermann, J. (eds.): Handbook on Project Management and Scheduling, Volume 1, Springer (2015)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zapata, J.C., Hodge, B.M., Reklaitis, G.V.: The multimode resource constrained multiproject scheduling problem: alternative formulations. AIChE J. (2008)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
  13. 13.
    Artigues, C.: Recent developments in mixed integer linear programming formulations for the resource-constrained project scheduling problem. PMS (2014)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Koné, O., Artigues, C., Lopez, P., Mongeau, M.: Event-based MILP models for resource-constrained project scheduling problems. In: C&OR (2011)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Broodney, H., Dotan, D., Greenberg, L., Masin, M.: Generic approach for systems design optimization in MBSE. In: INCOSE (2012)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    OMG Systems Modeling Language. http://www.omgsysml.org/
  17. 17.
    Masin, M., Limonad, L., Sela, A., Boaz, D., Greenberg, L., Mashkif, N., Rinat, R.: Pluggable analysis viewpoints for design space exploration. In: CSER (2013)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Parsons, J., Wand, Y.: Emancipating instances from the tyranny of classes in information modeling. ACM Trans. Database Syst. 25(2) (2000)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Katz G.: Rethinking the product development funnel (2011)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Masin, M., Broodney, H., Brown, C., Limonad, L., Mashkif, N., Sela, A.: Reusable derivation of operational metrics for architectural optimization. In: CSER (2014)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
  22. 22.
  23. 23.
  24. 24.
    Van Hentenryck, P.: The OPL optimization programming language (1999)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
  26. 26.
    Parush, A., Davidovitz, L., Shtub, A.: Simulation-based Learning in engineering education: performance and transfer in learning project management. JoEE (2006)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Davidovitch, L., Parush, A., Shtub, A.: Simulation-based learning: the learning-forgetting-relearning process and impact of learning history. C&E (2008)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Shtub, A., Parush, A., Hewett, T.: Guest editorial: the use of simulation in learning and teaching. IJEE (2009)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Parush, A., Davidovitch, L., Shtub, A.: Simulator-based team training to share re-sources in a matrix structure organization. IEEE Trans. EM (2010)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Shtub, A.: Simulation based training (SBT)—the next generation of project management training. PM World J. (2013)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Shtub, A., Iluz, M., Gersing, K., Oehman, J., Dubinsky, Y.: Implementation of lean engineering through simulation based training. PM World J. (2014)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Cohen, I., Iluz, M., Shtub, A.: A simulation-based approach in support of project management training for systems engineers. Syst. Eng. (2014)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Defense Systems Management College: Systems Engineering Fundamentals (1999)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Frank, M.: Cognitive and personality characteristics of successful systems engineers. INCOSE (2000)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael Masin
    • 1
    Email author
  • Yael Dubinsky
    • 1
  • Michal Iluz
    • 2
  • Evgeny Shindin
    • 1
  • Abraham Shtub
    • 2
  1. 1.IBM Research—HaifaMount CarmelHaifaIsrael
  2. 2.Technion—Israel Institute of TechnologyHaifaIsrael

Personalised recommendations