Skip to main content

Designing from the Future

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

In the last decade we have witnessed vibrant interest in Design Thinking that certainly has surpassed other important debates in management, such as on disruptive innovation or business model innovation (Google Trends or references listed in Google Scholar portray an impressive picture!). This development is remarkable insofar as research on Design Thinking is still in its infancy, generally lacking in robust findings. Moreover, the great outpouring of interest has rather simplified our current knowledge of Design Thinking, instead of deepening our understanding of its operative nature and possible applications. The purpose of this article is to take stock of Design Thinking by pinpointing a central feature that has been explicated, but not consistently developed further within current debates on the subject. I sense a great necessity to restate Design Thinking in ways that make it more future-oriented and less of a process that embraces today’s immediate challenges. This key enhancement provides a basis upon which to build future research that can offer a wider scope of application of Design Thinking and direct attention to leadership required to embed Design Thinking in organizations, to create desired futures for business or society as a whole.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ackhoff RL (1981) Creating the corporate future: plan or be planned for. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ackhoff RL, Magidson J, Addison HJ (2006) Idealized design: creating an organization’s future. Wharton, New Jersey, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Akin Ö (1986) Psychology of architectural design. Pion, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Aldrich HE, Kenworthy A (1999) The accidental entrepreneur: Campbellian antinomies and organizational foundings. In: Baum JAC, McKelvey B (eds) Variations in organization science: in honor of Donald Campbell. Sage, Newbury Park, CA, pp 19–33

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Aldrich HE, Ruef M (1999) Organizations evolving, 2nd edn. Sage, London, 2007 edn

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander C (1964) Notes of the synthesis of form. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvarez SA, Barney JB (2007) Discovery and creation: alternative theories of entrepreneurial action. Strateg Entrep J 1(1–2):11–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayres RU (2004) On the life cycle metaphor: where ecology and economics diverge. Ecol Econ 48(4):425–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayres RU, Simonis UE (1994) Industrial metabolism: restructuring for sustainable development. United Nations University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Banathy BH (1996) Designing social systems in a changing world. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Banathy BH (2000) Guided evolution of society: a systems view. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Berger PL (1967) The sacred canopy: elements of a social theory of religion. Anchor Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger PL, Luckmann T (1966) The social construction of reality: a treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Anchor Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Boland RJ, Collopy F (2004) Managing as designing. Stanford University Press, Stanford

    Google Scholar 

  • Braungart M, McDonough W, Bollinger A (2007) Cradle-to-cradle design: creating healthy emissions—a strategy for eco-effective product and system design. J Clean Prod 15(13):1337–1348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown T (2008) Design thinking. Harv Bus Rev 86(6):84–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown T (2009) Change by design: how design thinking transforms organizations and inspires innovation. Harper Collins, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan R (1992) Wicked problems in design thinking. Des Issues 8(2):5–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell DT (1960) Blind variation and selective retentions in creative thought as in other knowledge processes. Psychol Rev 67(6):380–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connell L, Keane MT (2006) A model of plausibility. Cognit Sci 30(1):95–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cross N (1993) Science and design methodology: a review. Res Eng Des 5(2):63–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cross N (2006) Designerly ways of knowing. Springer, London

    Google Scholar 

  • De Bono E (1970) Lateral thinking. Penguin, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Dess GG, Ireland RD, Zahra SA, Floyd SW, Janney JJ, Lane PJ (2003) Emerging issues in corporate entrepreneurship. J Manag 29(3):351–378

    Google Scholar 

  • Dosi G (1982) Technological paradigms and technological trajectories: a suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change. Res Policy 11(3):147–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubberly H, Pangaro P (2009) What is conversation? How can we design for effective conversation. Interact Mag 16(4):22–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubberly H, Esmonde P, Geoghegan M, Pangaro P (2002) Notes on the role of language and leadership in regenerating organizations. Sun Microsystems, Dubberly Design Office, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Eaton R (2001) Die Ideale Stadt. Von der Antike bis zur Gegenwart. Nicolai, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans R (1997) Translations from drawing to building. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Feigl H (1964) Philosophy of science. In: Passmore J (ed) Philosophical scholarship in the United States 1930–1960. Prentice Hall, Lewood Cliffs, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Fink D (2003) Die Grossen management consultants: Ihre Geschichte, Ihre Konzepte, Ihre Strategien [the famous management consultants: Their history, their concepts, their strategies]. Vahlen, München

    Google Scholar 

  • Floyd SW, Lane PJ (2000) Strategizing throughout the organization: managing role conflict in strategic renewal. Acad Manag Rev 25(1):154–177

    Google Scholar 

  • Floyd SW, Wooldridge B (1999) Knowledge creation and social networks in corporate entrepreneurship: the renewal of organizational capability. Entrepreneurship. Theory Pract 23(3):123–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster RN (1986) Innovation: the attacker’s advantage. Summit Books, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fuller RB, McHale J (1963) World design science decade, 1965–1975: world resources inventory. Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaglio CM, Katz JA (2001) The psychological basis of opportunity identification: entrepreneurial alertness. Small Bus Econ 16(2):95–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gartner WB (1985) A conceptual-framework for describing the phenomenon of new venture creation. Acad Manage Rev 10(4):696–706

    Google Scholar 

  • Gharajedaghi J (1999) Systems thinking: managing chaos and complexity: a platform for designing business architecture: managing chaos and complexity—a platform for designing business architecture. Butterworth Heinemann, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Harman G (1965) The inference to the best explanation. Philos Rev 74:88–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes HR (1978) Cognitive psychology and creating: thinking and creating. Dorsey, Homewood, IL

    Google Scholar 

  • Huff AW, Floyd SW, Sherman HD, Terjesen SA (2008) Strategic management: thought and action. Jossey-Bass (Wiley), San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurley PJ (2002) Concise introduction to logic. Wadsworth, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenlink PM (2007) Design conversation—future building and consciousness evolving. In: Jenlink PM, Banathy BH (eds) Dialogue as a collective means of design conversation. Springer, New York, pp 3–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenlink PM, Banathy BH (2007) Dialogue and designing our future. In: Jenlink PM, Banathy BH (eds) Dialogue as a collective means of design conversation. Springer, New York, pp 159–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenlink P, Carr AA (1996) Conversation as a medium for change in education. Educ Technol 36(1):31–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones JC, Thornley DG (1963) Conference on design methods. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley T (2004) The art of innovation: lessons in creativity from Ideo, America’s leading design firm. Profile Books, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley T, Littman J (2005) The ten faces of innovation: Ideo’s strategies for defeating the devil’s advocate and driving creativity throughout your organization. Random House LLC, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn TS (1962) The structure of scientific revolutions, 3rd edn. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1996 edn

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambert L (1995) Leading the conversation. In: Lambert L, Walker D, Zimmerman DO, Cooper JE, Lambert MD, Gardner ME, Ford-Slack PF (eds) The constructivist leader. Teachers College Press, New York, pp 83–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence S (2008) Nike + Community = Leadership, gba—go big always, vol. 2014: Interview with Roberto Tagliabue

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawson B (1980) How designers think: the design process demystified, 4th edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinthal DA (1997) Adaptation on rugged landscapes. Manag Sci 43(7):934–950

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liedtka J (2000) In defense of strategy as design. Calif Manage Rev 42(3):8–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd P, Scott P (1995) Difference in similarity: interpreting the architectural design process. Environ Plan B: Plann Des 22:383–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lockwood T (2010) Design thinking; integrating innovation, customer experience, and brand value. Allworth Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Lockwood T, Walton T (2008) Building design strategy. Allworth Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin R (2009a) The design of business: why design thinking is the next competitive advantage. Harvard Business Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin RL (2009b) The opposable mind: winning through integrative thinking. Harvard Business Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • McClusky M (2009) The Nike experiment: how the shoe giant unleashed the power of personal metrics. Wired Magazine. Retrieved Nov 11, 2009, from http://www.wired.com/2009/06/lbnp-nike/

  • McDonough W, Braungart M (2002) Design for the triple top line: new tools for sustainable commerce. Corp Environ Strateg 9(3):251–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonough W, Braungart M (2010) Cradle to cradle: remaking the way we make things. Macmillan, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Meadows DH, Meadows D, Randers J, Behrens W (1972) Limits to growth. The New American Library, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Meadows D, Randers J, Meadows D (2004) Limits to growth: the 30-year update. Chelsea Green Publishing, Vermont

    Google Scholar 

  • Meur LL (2008) “Seesmic Du Jour 123: Nike + with Michael Tchao”. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u4VkGs_pXm0. Accessed 27 Nov 2014

  • Mills JH (2003) Making sense of organizational change. Routledge, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nagl L (1992) Charles Sanders Peirce. Campus Verlag, Frankfurt am Main

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell A, Simon HA (1972) Human problem solving. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell A, Shaw JC, Simon HA (1959) The processes of creative thinking. Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Nike I (2013) Nike redefines “just do it” with new campaign”. http://news.nike.com/news/nike-evolves-just-do-it-with-new-campaign. Accessed 27 Nov 2014

  • Nonaka I (1994) A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organ Sci 5(1):14–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka I, Takeuchi H (1995) The knowledge-creating company: how Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce CS (1965) Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters T (1997) The circle of innovation: you can’t shrink your way to greatness. Hodder & Stoughton, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters T, Waterman RH (1982) In search of excellence. Harper and Row, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Plattner H, Meinel C, Weinberg U (2009) Design-thinking. Mi-Fachverlag, Landsberg am Lech

    Google Scholar 

  • Pondy LR (1978) Leadership is a language game. In: McCall M, Lombardo M (eds) Leadership: where else can we go? Duke University Press, Durham, NC

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasiel EM (1998) The Mckinsey way: using the techniques of the world’s top strategic consultants to help you and your business. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasiel EM, Friga PN (2001) The Mckinsey mind: understanding and implementing the problem-solving tools and management techniques of the world’s top strategic consulting firm. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Rittel HW, Webber MM (1984) Planning problems are wicked problems. Developments in design methodology. Wiley, New York, pp 135–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Roam D (2009) The back of the napkin (expanded edition) solving problems and selling ideas with pictures. Penguin, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe PG (1991) Design thinking. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahal D (1981) Patterns of technological innovation. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Advanced Book Program/World Science Division, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Schön DA (1983) The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle JR (1995) The construction of social reality. Penguin, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Shamiyeh M (2007a) Design new futures! Volume 14(4):14–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Shamiyeh M (2007b) Organizing for change: integrating architectural thinking in other fields. Birkhaueser, Basel

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shamiyeh M (2010) Creating desired futures: how design innovates business. Birkhaueser, Basel

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shamiyeh M (2014) Driving desired futures: turning design thinking into real innovation. Birkhaueser, Basel

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shane SA (2003) A general theory of entrepreneurship: the individual-opportunity nexus. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Simon HA (1969) The science of the artificial, 3rd edn. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1996 edn

    Google Scholar 

  • Spillers WR (1974) Basic questions of design theory. North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsoukas H, Chia R (2002) On organizational becoming: rethinking organizational change. Organ Sci 13(5):567–582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valkenburg R, Dorst K (1998) The reflective practice of design teams. Des Stud 19(3):249–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkataraman S (2003) Forword. In: Shane SA (ed) A general theory of entrepreneurship: the individual-opportunity Nexus. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham

    Google Scholar 

  • Verganti R (2009) Design-driven innovation: changing the rules of competition by radically innovating what thing mean. Harvard Business Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Walton D (2004) Abductive reasoning. The University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa

    Google Scholar 

  • Ware C (2010) Visual thinking for design. Morgan Kaufmann, Burlington, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick KE (1969) The social psychology of organizing, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1979 edn

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick KE (1989) Theory construction as disciplined imagination. Acad Manag Rev 14(4):516–531

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick KE (1995) Sensmaking in organizations. Sage, Thousands Oaks, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick KE, Sutcliffe KM, Obstfeld D (2005) Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organ Sci 16(4):409–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weitzman ML (1984) The share economy: conquering stagflation. Harvard University Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Shamiyeh .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Shamiyeh, M. (2016). Designing from the Future. In: Brenner, W., Uebernickel, F. (eds) Design Thinking for Innovation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26100-3_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics