Skip to main content

Breast Reconstruction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 1646 Accesses

Abstract

Breast reconstruction provides closure to many women who have been treated for breast cancer by increasing their comfort in clothing and providing a psychological benefit. The role of the plastic surgeon is to guide the patient through the decision tree to select a reconstructive pathway that is safe and meets expectations. Patients who choose reconstruction must navigate a reconstructive pathway guided by their plastic surgeons that includes decisions regarding the timing, type, and extent of reconstruction. The gold standard for breast cancer care includes an integrated multidisciplinary team approach comprising surgical oncologists, medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, oncology nurses, and plastic surgeons.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Goin MK, Goin JM. Midlife reactions to mastectomy and subsequent breast reconstruction. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1981;38(2):225–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Wellisch DK, Schain WS, Noone RB, Little 3rd JW. Psychosocial correlates of immediate versus delayed reconstruction of the breast. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1985;76(5):713–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gieni M, Avram R, Dickson L, Farrokhyar F, Lovrics P, Faidi S, et al. Local breast cancer recurrence after mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction for invasive cancer: a meta-analysis. Breast. 2012;21(3):230–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Mustonen P, Lepistö J, Papp A, Berg M, Pietiläinen T, Kataja V, et al. The surgical and oncological safety of immediate breast reconstruction. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2004;30(8):817–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Krumboeck A, Giovanoli P, Plock JA. Fat grafting and stem cell enhanced fat grafting to the breast under oncological aspects – recommendations for patient selection. Breast. 2013;22(5):579–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ihrai T, Georgiou C, Machiavello JC, Chignon-Sicard B, Figl A, Raoust I, et al. Autologous fat grafting and breast cancer recurrences: retrospective analysis of a series of 100 procedures in 64 patients. J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2013;47(4):273–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Boneti C, Yuen J, Santiago C, Diaz Z, Robertson Y, Korourian S, et al. Oncologic safety of nipple skin-sparing or total skin-sparing mastectomies with immediate reconstruction. J Am Coll Surg. 2011;212(4):686–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Mallon P, Feron JG, Couturaud B, Fitoussi A, Lemasurier P, Guihard T, et al. The role of nipple-sparing mastectomy in breast cancer: a comprehensive review of the literature. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;131(5):969–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Agrawal A, Sibbering DM, Courtney CA. Skin sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction: a review. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2013;39(4):320–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Petit JY, Lohsiriwat V, Clough KB, Sarfati I, Ihrai T, Rietjens M, et al. The oncologic outcome and immediate surgical complications of lipofilling in breast cancer patients: a multicenter study – Milan-Paris-Lyon experience of 646 lipofilling procedures. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;128(2):341–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. McCarthy CM, Pusic AL, Kerrigan CL. Silicone breast implants and magnetic resonance imaging screening for rupture: do U.S. Food and Drug Administration recommendations reflect an evidence-based practice approach to patient care? Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;121(4):1127–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lipworth L, Tarone RE, McLaughlin JK. Silicone breast implants and connective tissue disease: an updated review of the epidemiologic evidence. Ann Plast Surg. 2004;52:598.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lipworth L, Tarone RE, McLaughlin JK. Breast implants and fibromyalgia: a review of the epidemiologic evidence. Ann Plast Surg. 2004;52:284.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Rohrich RJ. Safety of silicone breast implants: scientific validation/vindication at last. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999;104:1786.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hulka BS, Kerkvliet NL, Tugwell P. Experience of a scientific panel formed to advise the federal judiciary on silicone breast implants. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:812.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Tugwell P, Wells G, Peterson J, Welch V, Page J, Davison C, et al. Do silicone breast implants cause rheumatologic disorders? A systematic review for a court-appointed national science panel. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2000;44:2477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Al-Sabounchi S, De Mey AM, Eder H. Textured saline-filled breast implants for augmentation mammaplasty: does overfilling prevent deflation? A long-term follow-up. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;118(1):215–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Dowden RV. Breast implant overfill, optimal fill, and the standard of care. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999;104(4):1185–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Cordeiro PG, Pusic AL, Disa JJ, Mc-Cormick B, VanZee K. Irradiation after immediate tissue expander/implant breast reconstruction: outcomes, complications, aesthetic results, and satisfaction in 156 patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;113:877–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Restifo RJ, Ward BA, Scoutt LM, Brown JM. Timing, magnitude, and utility of surgical delay in the TRAM flap: II. Clinical studies. Plastic and reconstructive. Surgery. 1997;99(4):1217–23.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Shestak KC, Johnson RR, Greco RJ, Williams SW. Partial mastectomy and breast reduction as a valuable treatment option for patients with macromastia and carcinoma of the breast. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1993;177:54–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Shestak KC, Gabriel A, Landecker A, Peters S, Shestak A, Kim J. Assessment of long-term nipple projection: a comparison of three techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;110(3):780–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Shestak KC, Nguyen TD. The double opposing periareola flap: a novel concept for nipple areola reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;119(2):473–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Khouri R, Del Vecchio D. Breast reconstruction and augmentation using pre-expansion and autologous fat transplantation. Clin Plast Surg. 2009;36(2):269–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kenneth C. Shestak MD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Davidson, E.H., Nguyen, V.T., Shestak, K.C. (2016). Breast Reconstruction. In: Aydiner, A., İgci, A., Soran, A. (eds) Breast Disease. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26012-9_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26012-9_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-26010-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-26012-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics