Skip to main content

Evaluation of a Mobile Home Care Platform

Lessons Learned and Practical Guidelines

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 9425))

Abstract

As the population of the industrialized world is aging, the field that deals with seniors’ adoption of technology has gained ground in the scientific community. Recent advances in technology have allowed the development of sophisticated telecare systems that support the independent living of seniors, with communication, remote health monitoring and emergency response services. However, usability issues often prevent elderly people from enjoying the benefits of modern technology, despite the amount of research to understand their needs in system design. In this work, we have performed a usability assessment of the “BioAssist” system, which is an integrated home care platform that incorporates both communication and health monitoring features. A comparative evaluation with the “iTriage” application, followed by a series of interviews and qualitative analysis have provided us with valuable insights and guidelines for designing home care systems for seniors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Mitzner, T.L., Boron, J.B., Fausset, C.B., Adams, A.E., Charness, N., Czaja, S.J., Dijktra, K., Fisk, A.D., Rogers, W.A., Sharit, J.: Older adults talk technology: technology usage and attitudes. Comput. Hum. Behav. 26(6), 1710–1721 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Selwyn, N.: The information aged: a qualitative study of older adults’ use of information and communications technology. J. Aging Stud. 18(4), 369–384 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lee, B., Chen, Y., Hewitt, L.: Age differences in constraints encountered by seniors in their use of computers and the Internet. Comput. Hum. Behav. 27(3), 1231–1237 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Botsis, T., Demiris, G., Pedersen, S., Hartvigsen, G.: Home telecare technologies for the elderly. J. Telemedicine Telecare 14(7), 333–337 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. PACITA Project: EU stakeholder involvement on ageing society. Telecare Technology for an ageing society in Europe. Current State and Future Developments. http://wp6.pacitaproject.eu/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/Telecare-description-web.pdf. Accessed 20 June 2015

  6. Ojel-Jaramillo, J.M., Cañas, J.J.: Enhancing the usability of telecare devices. Hum. Technol. Interdisc. J. Hum. ICT Environ. 2, 103–118 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Renaud, K., Van Biljon, J.: Predicting technology acceptance and adoption by the elderly: a qualitative study. In: Proceedings of the 2008 Annual Research Conference of the South African Institute of Computer Scientists and Information Technologists on IT Research in Developing Countries, pp. 210–219. Riding the Wave of Technology (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wagner, N., Hassanein, K., Head, M.: Computer use by older adults: a multi-disciplinary review. Comput. Hum. Behav. 26(5), 870–882 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gatto, S.L., Tak, S.H.: Computer, Internet, and e-mail use among older adults: benefits and barriers. Educ. Gerontol. 34(9), 800–811 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Patsoule, E., Koutsabasis, P.: Redesigning websites for older adults: a case study. Behav. Inf. Technol. 33(6), 561–573 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Salama, M., Shawish, A.: Taxonomy of usability requirements for ageing. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Software Engineering, Parallel and Distributed Systems (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  12. McGee-Lennon, M.R., Wolters, M.K., Brewster, S.: User-centred multimodal reminders for assistive living. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 2105–2114 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Karahasanović, A., Brandtzæg, P.B., Heim, J., Lüders, M., Vermeir, L., Pierson, J., Lievens, B., Vanattenhoven, J., Jans, G.: Co-creation and user-generated content – elderly people’s user requirements. Comput. Hum. Behav. 25(3), 655–678 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lindberg, T., Näsänen, R., Müller, K.: How age affects the speed of perception of computer icons. Displays 27(4–5), 170–177 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Claris Companion Official Website. http://www.clariscompanion.com/

  16. BePatient Official Website. http://www.bepatient.com/

  17. BeClose Official Website. http://beclose.com/

  18. Genise, P.: Usability Evaluation: Methods and Techniques: Version 2.0, University of Texas (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Brooke, J.: SUS - a quick and dirty usability scale. http://cui.unige.ch/isi/icle-wiki/_media/ipm:test-suschapt.pdf. Accessed 20 June 2015

  20. Brooke, J.: SUS: a retrospective. J. Usability Stud. 8(2), 29–40 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Bangor, A., Kortum, P., Miller, J.: Determining what individual SUS scores mean: adding an adjective rating scale. J. Usability Stud. 4(3), 114–123 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  22. WAMMI Official Website. http://www.wammi.com/

  23. QUIS Official Website. http://www.lap.umd.edu/quis/

  24. iTriage Official Website. https://www.itriagehealth.com/

  25. BioAssist Official Website. https://bioassist.gr/

  26. WebRTC Official Website. http://www.webrtc.org/

  27. CrossWalk Official Website. https://crosswalk-project.org/

  28. Smith, J., Firth, J.: Qualitative data analysis: the framework approach. Nurse Researcher 18(2), 52–62 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Dhillon, J.S., Wünsche, B.C., Lutteroth, C.: An online social-networking enabled telehealth system for seniors: a case study. In: Proceedings of the Fourteenth Australasian User Interface Conference, vol. 139, pp. 53–62 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Stojmenova, E., Imperl, B., Žohar, T., Dinevski, D.: Adapted user-centered design: a strategy for the higher user acceptance of innovative e-health services. Future Internet 4(3), 776–787 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Bozkurt, S., Zayim, N., Gulkesen, K.H., Samur, M.K., Karaagaoglu, N., Saka, O.: Usability of a web-based personal nutrition management tool. Inform. Health Soc. Care 36(4), 190–205 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christos Panagopoulos .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Panagopoulos, C., Kalatha, E., Tsanakas, P., Maglogiannis, I. (2015). Evaluation of a Mobile Home Care Platform. In: De Ruyter, B., Kameas, A., Chatzimisios, P., Mavrommati, I. (eds) Ambient Intelligence. AmI 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9425. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26005-1_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26005-1_22

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-26004-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-26005-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics