Advertisement

Leavis and Pedagogy: Critical Practice

  • Steven CranfieldEmail author
Chapter
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Education book series (BRIEFSEDUCAT)

Abstract

This chapter continues the exploration of Leavis’s paradigm of critical exchange, particularly in relation to the practice of teaching and learning. Further criticisms that have been put forward about the critical exchange are analysed and comparisons made with equivalent concepts in other educational thinkers. The chapter concludes with a discussion of the relevance and potential contribution of Leavis’s paradigm to contemporary higher education.

Keywords

Leavis Teaching Learning Pedagogy Creative collaboration John Wyatt Donald Schön Master and novice Vygotsky Zone of proximal development Pedagogisation Delegitimation Margaret Archer Reflexivity Creativity 

References

  1. Anderson, P. (1968). Components of the national culture. New Left Review, 1/50.Google Scholar
  2. Archer, M. S. (1995). Realist social theory: The morphogenetic approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Archer, M. S. (2012). The reflexive imperative in late modernity.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1974). Theory in practice: Increasing professional effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  5. Au, W., & Ferrare, J. J. (Eds.). (2015). Mapping corporate education reform: Power and policy networks in the neoliberal state. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Barnett, R. (1990). The idea of higher education. Buckingham: SRHE and Open University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Barnett, R. (1997). Higher education: A critical business. Buckingham: SRHE and Open University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Barnett, R. (2000). University knowledge in an age of supercomplexity. Higher Education, 40(4), 409–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Barnett, R., & Coates, K. (2005). Engaging the curriculum in higher education. Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Bernstein, B. (1990). The structuring of pedagogic discourse. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bonk, C. J., & Graham, C. R. (2012). The handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs. San Francisco: John Wiley.Google Scholar
  12. Bloom, H. (1994). The western canon. New York and London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  13. Buber, M. (1923). I and thou. Trans. 1970 W. Kaufmann. Edinburgh: T. and T. Clark.Google Scholar
  14. Caetano, A. (2015). Defining personal reflexivity: A critical reading of Archer’s approach. European Journal of Social Theory, 18(1), 60–75.Google Scholar
  15. Case, J. M. (2013). Researching student learning in higher education: A social realist approach. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Case, J. M. (2015). A social realist perspective on student learning in higher education: The morphogenesis of agency. Higher Education Research and Development, 34(5), 841–852.Google Scholar
  17. Dennick, R. (2007). Small group teaching, tutorials, seminars and beyond. Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  18. Dewey, J. (2007). Experience and education. London: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  19. Engeström, Y., Miettinen, R., & Punamäki, R. L. (Eds.). (1999). Perspectives on activity theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Evans, C. (1993). English people: The experience of teaching and learning English in British universities. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Ehrlich, T. (Ed.). (2000). Civic responsibility and higher education. Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing.Google Scholar
  22. Healey, M., Flint, K., & Harrington, A. (2014). Engagement through partnership: Students as partners in learning and teaching in higher education. York: Higher Education Academy. Retrieved June 6, 2015, from www.heacademy.ac.uk/sites/default/files/resources/Engagement_through_partnership.pdf.
  23. Henderson, M., Selwyn, N., Finger, G., & Aston, R. (2015). Students’ everyday engagement with digital technology in university: Exploring patterns of use and ‘usefulness’. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 37(3), 308–319.Google Scholar
  24. Hill, J., Blackler, V., Chellew, R., Ha, L., & Lendrum, S. (2013). From researched to researcher: Student experiences of becoming co-producers and co-disseminators of knowledge. Planet, 27(1), 35–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hilliard, C. (2012). English as a vocation: The ‘Scrutiny’ movement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Holbrook, D. (1964). English for the rejected: Training literacy in the lower streams of the secondary school. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Kaiser, F., Maassen, P., Meek, L., van Vught, F., de Weert, E., & Goedegebuure, L. (Eds). (2014). Higher education policy: An international comparative perspective. New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  28. Kiley, M. (2011). Government policy and research higher degree education. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 33(6), 629–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Leavis, F. R. (1969). English literature in our time and the university. The Clark Lectures, 1967. London: Chatto and Windus. Reprinted 1979. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Leavis, F. R. (1972). Nor shall my sword: Discourses on pluralism, compassion and social hope. London: Chatto and Windus.Google Scholar
  31. Leavis, F. R. (1975). The living principle: ‘English’ as a discipline of thought. London: Chatto and Windus. Reprinted 1998. Chicago: Ivan R. Dee.Google Scholar
  32. Leavis, F. R. (1976). Thought, words and creativity. London: Chatto and Windus.Google Scholar
  33. Leavis, F. R. (1986). Valuation in criticism. Ed. with introduction, G. Singh. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  34. MacKillop, I. (1995). F. R. Leavis: A life in criticism. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
  35. Martin-Jones, M., & Saxena, M. (1996). Turn-taking, power asymmetries, and the positioning of bilingual participants in classroom discourse. Linguistics and Education, 8(1), 105–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mezirow, J. (2000). Learning as transformation: Critical perspectives on a theory in progress. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  37. National Audit Office (2008). Widening participation in higher education. London: Stationery Office. www.nao.org.uk/report/widening-participation-in-higher-education Accessed 3 June 2015.
  38. Ness, E. C., Tandberg, D. A., & McLendon, M. K. (2015). Interest groups and state policy for higher education: New conceptual understandings and future research directions. In Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (pp. 151–186). Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
  39. Schön, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  40. Schön, D. A. (1988). Coaching reflective teaching. In P. P. Grimmett & G. F. Erickson (Eds.), Reflection in teacher education (pp. 19–30). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  41. Scriven, M., & Paul, R. (2007). Defining critical thinking. The Critical Thinking Community: Foundation for Critical Thinking. http://www.criticalthinking.org/aboutCT/define_critical_thinking.cfm. Accessed 3 June 2015.
  42. Scruton, R. (1998). The intelligent person’s guide to modern culture. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
  43. Seale, J., Gibson, S., Haynes, J., & Potter, A. (2015). Power and resistance: Reflections on the rhetoric and reality of using participatory methods to promote student voice and engagement in higher education. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 39(4), 534–552.Google Scholar
  44. Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Singh, P. (2002). Pedagogising knowledge: Bernstein’s theory of the pedagogic device. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 23(4), 571–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Singleton-Jackson, J. A., Jackson, D. L., & Reinhardt, J. (2010). Students as consumers of knowledge: Are they buying what we’re selling? Innovative Higher Education, 35(5), 343–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Stromquist, N. P., & Monkman, K. (Eds.). (2014). Globalization and education: Integration and contestation across cultures. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield Education.Google Scholar
  48. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Watson, G. (1977). The Leavises, the ‘social’ and the left. Swansea: Brynmill.Google Scholar
  50. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning as a social system. Systems Thinker, 9(5), 2–3.Google Scholar
  51. Wyatt, J. (1990). Commitment to higher education. Buckingham: SRHE and Open University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Leadership and Professional Development, Westminster Business SchoolUniversity of WestminsterLondonUK

Personalised recommendations