Skip to main content

Trauma of the Colon, Rectum, and Anus

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The ASCRS Textbook of Colon and Rectal Surgery

Abstract

The management of colonic trauma has evolved considerably over the past century and a half. The initial futility of abdominal surgery during the American Civil War gave way to mandatory colostomy in World War II. Recent well-done trials have now demonstrated the safety of primary repair in most patients, although care must still be used in damage-control situations. Extraperitoneal rectal trauma is typically managed by proximal diversion; the utility of routine distal washout and presacral drainage has recently been called into question. Anal trauma lends itself to delayed reconstruction in many cases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Demetriades D, Velmahos G, Cornwell III E, et al. Selective nonoperative management of gunshot wounds to the anterior abdomen. Arch Surg. 1997;132(2):178–83.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ross SE, Cobean RA, Hoyt DB, et al. Blunt colonic injury—a multicenter review. J Trauma. 1992;33(3):379–84.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Moore EE, Cogbill TH, Malangoni MA, et al. Organ injury scaling II, pancreas, duodenum, small bowel, colon, and rectum. J Trauma. 1990;30(11):1427–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Velmahos GC, Constantinou C, Tillou A, et al. Abdominal computed tomographic scan for patients with gunshot wounds to the abdomen selected for nonoperative management. J Trauma. 2005;50(5):1155–60.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Root HD, Hauser CW, McKinley CR. Diagnostic peritoneal lavage. Surgery. 1965;57(6):633–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Perry WB, Brooks JP, Muskat PC. The history of military colorectal trauma management. Semin Colon Rectal Surg. 2004;15(2):70–9.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Wallace G. War surgery of the abdomen, lecture I. Lancet. 1917;ii:571–8.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bamberger PK. The adoption of laparotomy for the treatment of penetrating abdominal wounds in war. Military Med. 1996;161(1):189–96.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ogilvie WH. Abdominal wounds in the Western Desert. Surg Gyn Obst. 1994;78(2):225–38.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Office of the Surgeon General. Circular Letter No. 178. October 23, 1943.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ventrees A, Wakefield M, Pickett C, et al. Outcomes of primary repair and primary anastomosis in war-related colon injuries. J Trauma. 2009;66(6):1286–93.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Glasgow SC, Steele SR, Duncan JE, et al. Epidemiology of modern battlefield colorectal trauma: a review of 977 coalition casualties. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012;73(6):S503–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Woodhall JP, Ochsner A. The management of perforating injuries of the colon and rectum. Surgery. 1951;29(2):305–20.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Stone HH, Fabian TC. Management of perforating colon trauma: randomization between primary closure and exteriorization. Ann Surg. 1979;190(4):430–6.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Chappuis CW, Frey DJ, Deitzen CD, et al. Management of penetrating colon injuries. A prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg. 1991;213(5):492–7.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Sasaki LS, Allaben RD, Golwala R, et al. Primary repair of colon injuries: a prospective randomized study. J Trauma. 1995;39(5):895–901.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Gonzalez PR, Falimirski ME, Holevar MR. Further evaluation of colostomy in penetrating colon injury. Am Surg. 2000;66(4):342–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Cornwell III E, Velmahos G, Berne TV, et al. The fate of colonic suture lines in high-risk trauma patients: a prospective analysis. J Am Coll Surg. 1998;187(1):58–63.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Stewart RM, Fabian TC, Croce MA, et al. Is resection and primary anastomosis following destructive colon wounds always safe? Am J Surg. 1994;168(4):316–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Murray JA, Demetriades D, Colson M, et al. Colonic resection in trauma: colostomy vs. anastomosis. J Trauma. 1999;46(2):250–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Demetriades D, Murray JA, Chan L, et al. Penetrating colon injuries requiring resection: diversion or anastomosis? An AAST prospective multicenter study. J Trauma. 2001;50(5):765–75.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Sharpe JP, Magnotti LJ, Weinberg JA, et al. Adherence to a simplified management algorithm reduces morbidity and mortality after penetrating colon injuries: a 15-year experience. J Am Coll Surg. 2012;214(4):591–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Crookes B. An evidence-based approach to damage control laparotomy for trauma. In: Cohn SM, editor. Acute care surgery and trauma: evidence based practice. 1st ed. London: Informa; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Miller PR, Chang MC, Hoth JJ. Colonic resection in the setting of damage control laparotomy: is delayed anastomosis safe? Am Surg. 2007;73(6):606–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Georgoff P, Perales P, Laguna B, et al. Colonic injuries and the damage control abdomen: does management strategy matter? J Surg Res. 2013;181(2):293–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kashuk JL, Cothren CC, Moore EE, et al. Primary repair of civilian colon injuries is safe in the damage control scenario. Surgery. 2009;146(6):663–70.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Weinberg JA, Griffin RL, Vandromme MJ, et al. Management of colon wounds in the setting of damage control laparotomy: a cautionary tale. J Trauma. 2009;67(4):929–35.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Fischer PE, Nunn AM, Wormer BA, et al. Vasopressor use after initial damage control laparotomy increases risk for anastomotic disruption in the management of destructive colon injuries. Am J Surg. 2013;206(6):900–3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Sharpe JP, Magnotti LJ, Weinberg JA, et al. Adherence to an established management algorithm for destructive colon injuries after abbreviated laparotomy: a 17-year experience. J Am Coll Surg. 2014;218(4):636–43.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Ciesla DJ, Burch JM. Colon and rectal injuries. In: Asensio JA, Trunkey DD, editors. Current therapy of trauma and surgical critical care. 1st ed. Philadelphia: Mosby Elsevier; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Law WL, Bailey HR, Max E, et al. Single layer continuous colon and rectal anastomosis using monofilament absorbable suture (Maxon): study of 500 cases. Dis Colon Rectum. 1999;42(6):736–40.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Demetriades D, Murray JA, Chan LS, et al. Hand sewn versus stapled anastomosis in penetrating colon injuries requiring resection: a multicenter study. J Trauma. 2002;52(1):117–21.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Morken JJ, Kraatz JJ, Balcos EG, et al. Civilian rectal trauma: a changing perspective. Surgery. 1999;126(4):693–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Velmahos GC, Gomez H, Falabella A, et al. Operative management of civilian rectal gunshot wounds: simpler is better. World J Surg. 2000;24(1):114–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Ivatury RR, Licata J, Gunduz Y, et al. Management options in penetrating rectal injuries. Am Surg. 1991;57(1):50–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Anderson SW, Soto JA. Anorectal trauma: the use of computed tomography in diagnosis. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2008;29(6):472–82.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Lavenson GS, Cohen A. Management of rectal injuries. Am J Surg. 1971;122(2):226–30.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Siler VE, Bebb K. Trauma to the perineum, anus, rectum, and colon. Am J Surg. 1950;80(4):652–62.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. McCune WS. War wounds of the rectum and anal sphincter. Surgery. 1948;23(4):653–64.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Mossadegh S, Tai N, Midwinter M, et al. Improvised explosive device related pelvi-perineal trauma: anatomic injuries and surgical management. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012;73(2 Suppl 1):S24–31.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Glasgow SC, Heafner TA, Watson JDB, et al. Initial management and outcome of modern battlefield anal trauma. Dis Colon Rectum. 2014;57(8):1012–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Levine JH, Longo WE, Pruitt C, et al. Management of selected rectal injuries by primary repair. Am J Surg. 1996;172(5):575–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Navsaria PH, Shaw JM, Zellweger R, et al. Diagnostic laparoscopy and diverting sigmoid loop colostomy in the management of civilian extraperitoneal rectal gunshot injuries. Bit J Surg. 2004;91(4):460–4.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Davit FE, Schafer GP, Po RP, et al. Open pelvic fracture and rectal injury managed with abdominoperineal resection. Am Surg. 2010;76:E15–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Gonzalez RP, Falimirski ME, Holevar MR. The role of presacral drainage in the management of penetrating rectal injuries. J Trauma. 1998;45(4):656–61.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to W. Brian Perry M.D., F.A.S.C.R.S. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 ASCRS (American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Perry, W.B. (2016). Trauma of the Colon, Rectum, and Anus. In: Steele, S.R., Hull, T.L., Read, T.E., Saclarides, T.J., Senagore, A.J., Whitlow, C.B. (eds) The ASCRS Textbook of Colon and Rectal Surgery. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25970-3_43

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25970-3_43

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-25968-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-25970-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics