Advertisement

Familiarity in Team-Based Online Games: The Interplay Between Player Familiarity and the Concepts of Social Presence, Team Trust, and Performance

  • Matthew Hudson
  • Paul Cairns
  • A. Imran NordinEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9429)

Abstract

Team-based gaming is now among the most popular forms of gaming, with games like League of Legends and Dota 2 attracting millions of players around the world. It is generally held that playing digital games with friends offers a different gaming experience to strangers. However the interplay between familiarity and social presence, a core experience in shared virtual environments, has yet to be thoroughly explored. This paper presents the results of a user experience survey of 821 gamers, which aimed to explore the interplay between familiarity and social presence. The results showed an interplay between familiarity and the social presence players felt with their team-mates, however this interplay varied across the various games in this study.

Keywords

Social presence Team-based games Cooperation Competition Performance Trust 

References

  1. 1.
    Biocca, F., Harms, C., Burgoon, J.: Towards a more robust theory of social presence: review and suggested criteria. Presence 12(5), 456–480 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cohen, J.: A power primer. Psychol. Bull. 112(1), 155–159 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Costa, A., Roe, R., Taillieu, T.: Trust within teams: the relation with performance effectiveness. Eur. J. Work Organ. Psychol. 10(3), 225–244 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Curseu, P., Otoiu, C.: It is also a matter of time: a systemic and temporal account for the interplay of trust and psychological safety in groups. Soc. Psychol. 32(2), 169–183 (2013)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gajadhar, B.J., de Kort, Y.A.W., Ijsselsteijn, W.A.: Shared fun is doubled fun: player enjoyment as a function of social setting. In: Markopoulos, P., de Ruyter, B., Ijsselsteijn, W.A., Rowland, D. (eds.) Fun and Games 2008. LNCS, vol. 5294, pp. 106–117. Springer, Heidelberg (2008) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Griffiths, M., Hussain, Z., Grüsser, S.M., Thalemann, R., Cole, H., Davies, M.N., Chappell, D.: Social interactions in online gaming. Int. J. Game-Based Learn. (IJGBL) 1(4), 20–36 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Guo, Y., Shen, S., Visser, O., Iosup, A.: An analysis of online match-based games. In: 2012 IEEE International Workshop on Haptic Audio Visual Environments and Games (HAVE), pp. 134–139. IEEE (2012)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hudson, M., Cairns, P.: Measuring social presence in team based digital games. In: Interacting with Presence. de gruyter (2014)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ijsselsteijn, W., Harper, B.: Virtually there? a vision on presence research. Presence-Ist 2000–31014 Ec Public Deliverable (D2) (2001)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jakobsson, M., Taylor, T.: The sopranos meets everquest: social networking in massively multiplayer online games. In: Proceedings of the 2003 Digital Arts and Culture (DAC) Conference, Melbourne, pp. 81–90 (2003)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kalawsky, R.: The validity of presence as a reliable human performance metric in immersive environments. Paper presented at the Presence 2000 Workshop (2000)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kline, P.: The New Psychometrics. Routledge, New York (1998)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Langfred, C.: Too much of a good thing? negative effects of high trust and individual autonomy in self-managing teams. Acad. Manag. J. 47, 385–399 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lewicki, R., McAllister, D., Bies, R.: Trust and distrust: new relationships and realities. Acad. Manag. Rev. 23, 438–458 (1998)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mason, W., Clauset, A.: Friends FTW! friendship and competition in halo: reach. In: Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 375–386. ACM (2013)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    McAllister, D.: Affect and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Acad. Manag. J. 38, 24–59 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    McCluskey, A., Lalkhen, A.: Statistics IV: interpreting the results of statistical tests. Continuing Edu. Anaesth. Crit. Care Pain 7(6), 208–212 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Murthy, D.: Digital ethnography an examination of the use of new technologies for social research. Sociology 42(5), 837–855 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Oxford, J., Ponzi, D., Geary, D.C.: Hormonal responses differ when playing violent video games against an ingroup and outgroup. Evol. Hum. Behav. 31(3), 201–209 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Park, S.B., Chung, N.: Mediating roles of self-presentation desire in online game community commitment and trust behavior of massive multiplayer online role-playing games. Comput. Hum. Behav. 27(6), 2372–2379 (2011)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Peng, W., Hsieh, G.: The influence of competition, cooperation, and player relationship in a motor performance centered computer game. Comput. Hum. Behav. 28(6), 2100–2106 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ravaja, N., Saari, T., Turpeinen, M., Laarni, J., Salminen, M., Kivikangas, M.: Spatial presence and emotions during video game playing: does it matter with whom you play? Presence: Teleoperators Virtual Environ. 15(4), 381–392 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Schouten, D.: Shared experience: the influence of the in-game social connection on the player experience in digital gaming (2011). http://alexandria.tue.nl/extra2/afstversl/tm/Schouten%202011.pdf. Accessed 6 December 2011
  24. 24.
    Schroeder, R.: Copresence and interaction in virtual environments: an overview of the range of issues. In: Presence 2002: Fifth International Workshop, pp. 274–295 (2002)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Schubert, T., Friedmann, F., Regenbrecht, H.: The experience of presence: factor analytic insights. Presence: Teleoperators Virtual Environ. 10(3), 266–281 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Slater, M., Usoh, M., Steed, A.: Depth of presence in virtual environments. Presence 3, 130–144 (1994)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Slater, M., Wilbur, S.: A framework for immersive virtual environments (five): speculations on the role of presence in virtual environments. Presence 6, 603–616 (1997)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Spante, M., Heldal, I., Steed, A., Axelsson, A.S., Schroeder, R.: Strangers and friends in networked immersive environments: virtual spaces for future living. In: Proceeding of Home Oriented Informatics and Telematics (HOIT) (2003)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Szentgyorgyi, C., Terry, M., Lank, E.: Renegade gaming: practices surrounding social use of the nintendo DS handheld gaming system. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1463–1472. ACM (2008)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Usoh, M., Alberto, C., Slater, M.: Presence: experiments in the psychology of virtual environments. Department of Computer Science, University College London, UK (1996)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Van Selm, M., Jankowski, N.W.: Conducting online surveys. Qual. Quant. 40(3), 435–456 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Von Der PüTten, A.M., Klatt, J., Ten Broeke, S., McCall, R., Krämer, N.C., Wetzel, R., Blum, L., Oppermann, L., Klatt, J.: Subjective and behavioral presence measurement and interactivity in the collaborative augmented reality game timewarp. Interact. Comput. 24(4), 317–325 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Waddell, J., Peng, W.: Does it matter with whom you slay? the effects of competition, cooperation and relationship type among video game players. Comput. Hum. Behav. 38, 331–338 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Webber, S.: Development of cognitive and affective trust in teams: a longitudinal study. Small Group Res. 39, 746 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Wilson, J., Straus, S., McEvily, B.: All in due time: the development of trust in computer-mediated and face-to-face teams. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Proc. 99, 16–33 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Wright, K.: Researching internet-based populations: advantages and disadvantages of online survey research, online questionnaire authoring software packages, and web survey services. J. Comput.-Mediated Commun. 10(3), 00–00 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Xu, Y., Cao, X., Sellen, A., Herbrich, R., Graepel, T.: Sociable killers: understanding social relationships in an online first-person shooter game. In: Proceedings of the ACM 2011 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 197–206. ACM (2011)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Yee, N.: The daedalus project: engineering relationships (2003). www.nickyee.com/daedalus/archives/print/000429.php. Accessed 30 January 2014
  39. 39.
    Yee, N.: The daedalus project: inside out (2003). www.nickyee.com/daedalus/archives/print/000523.php. Accessed 30 January 2014
  40. 40.
    Yee, N.: The daedalus project (2009). www.nickyee.com/daedalus. Accessed 01 August 2015

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceUniversity of YorkYorkUK
  2. 2.Institute of Visual Informatics (IVI)The National University of MalaysiaBangiMalaysia

Personalised recommendations