Skip to main content

A Brief History of Sexual Offender Risk Assessment

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Treatment of Sex Offenders

Abstract

The assessment of risk of further offending behavior by adult sexual perpetrators has come a long way since the early 1900s. From risk estimations based on clinical observation and environmental changes in the 1920s, anthropological and longitudinal studies of juvenile offenders in the 1930s, the examination of psychoneurotic patients in the 1940s to the application of actuarial prediction to clinical assessment in the 1950s, researchers and practitioners have sought to identify valid and reliable measures of recidivism risk in sexual offenders. The emphasis in risk prediction slowly changed following Meehl’s (1954) seminal contributions to the clinical-statistical debate which introduced the idea of mechanical risk assessment tools based on known recidivism factors. Advances in what we know about sexual offending behavior and how to reliably assess sexual recidivism risk led to the development of actuarial risk assessment instruments (ARAIs), probably one of the most important advances in the field of risk assessment. These instruments have permeated the entire criminal justice system with specific reference being made to relevant legislative acts in the USA, Canada, the UK, and other European countries on the use of ARAIs. This chapter summarizes the history and early development of risk assessment from clinical intuition and observation to the development of different “generations” of risk assessment instruments and considers what is next on the horizon in risk assessment of sexual offenders.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis is a comparison of the sensitivity (true positive divided by the sum of the true positive and false negatives) with specificity (true negative divided by the sum of the false positive and false negative), i.e., hit rate against the false alarm rate.

    Referring to Cohen (1992), Rice and Harris (2005) formulated the following interpretation criteria for AUC values: Results of 0.71 or above are classified as “good” and numbers between 0.64 and 0.71 are classified as “moderate.” Significant AUC values that are below the value of 0.64 are classified as “small.”

References

  • Allan, A., Dawson, D., & Allan, M. M. (2006). Prediction of the risk of male sexual reoffending in Australia. Australian Psychologist, 41, 60–68. doi:10.1080/00050060500391886.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, D. A., & Bonta, J. (2006). The psychology of criminal conduct (4th ed.). Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, D. A., Bonta, J., & Wormith, S. J. (2004). The level of service/case management inventory (LS/CMI). Toronto, ON: Multi-Health Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, D. A., Bonta, J., & Wormith, S. J. (2006). The recent past and near future of risk and/or need assessment. Crime and Delinquency, 52, 7–27. doi:10.1177/0011128705281756.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baltieri, D. A., & de Andrade, A. G. (2008). Comparing serial and nonserial sexual offenders: Alcohol and street drug consumption, impulsiveness and history of sexual abuse. Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria, 30, 25–31. doi:10.1590/S1516-44462006005000067.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barbaree, H. E. (1997). Evaluating treatment efficacy with sexual offenders: The insensitivity of recidivism studies to treatment effects. Sexual Abuse, 9, 111–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbaree, H. E., Langton, C. M., Blanchard, R., & Boer, D. P. (2008). Predicting recidivism in sex offenders using the SVR-20: The contribution of age-at-release. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 7, 47–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbaree, H., Langton, C. M., Andres Gopnik-Lewinski, A., & Beach, C. A. (2013). Risk assessment of sex offenders. In H. Bloom & R. D. Schneider (Eds.), Law and mental disorder: A comprehensive and practical approach. Toronto, ON: Irwin Law Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beech, A. R., Fisher, D., & Beckett, R. (1999). Step 3: An Evaluation of the prison sex offenders treatment program. London: HMSO. UK. Home Office Occasional Report. Home Office Publications Unit, 50, Queen Anne’s Gate, London, SW1 9AT, England. Retrieved April 10, 2005, from www.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/pdfs/occ-step3.pdf.

  • Bengtson, S. (2008). Is new better? A cross-validation of the Static-2002 and the Risk Matrix 2000 in a Danish sample of sexual offenders. Psychology, Crime & Law, 14, 85–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boer, D. P., Frize, M., Pappas, R., Morrissey, C., & Lindsay, W. R. (2010). Suggested adaptations to the SVR-20 for offenders with intellectual disabilities. In L. A. Craig, W. R. Lindsay, & K. D. Browne (Eds.), Assessment and treatment of sexual offenders with intellectual disabilities: A handbook (pp. 177–192). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Boer, D. P., & Hart, S. D. (2009). Sex offender risk assessment: Research, evaluation, “best-practice” recommendations and future directions. In J. L. Ireland, C. A. Ireland, & P. Birch (Eds.), Violent and sexual offenders. Assessment, treatment and management (pp. 27–42). Cullompton, UK: Willan Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boer, D. P., Hart, S. D., Kropp, P. R., & Webster, C. D. (1997). Manual for the sexual violence risk-20: Professional guidelines for assessing risk of sexual violence. Vancouver, Canada: The Mental Health, Law and Policy Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boer, D. P., Hart, S. D., Kropp, P. R., & Webster, C. D. (2015). Sexual violence risk-20, Version 2. Burnaby, Canada: Mental Health, Law, & Policy Institute, Simon Fraser University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonger, W. A. (1936). Introduction to Criminology, tr. London: E. Van Loo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonta, J., & Andrews, D. A. (2007). Risk-need-responsivity model for offender assessment and rehabilitation (User Report 2007–06). Ottawa, ON: Public Safety Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briken, P., & Müller, J. L. (2014). Beurteilung der Schuldfähigkeit bei paraphiler Störung. Kann der Schweregrad der Störung mithilfe von Kriterien aus Prognoseinstrumenten erfasst werden? [Assessment of criminal responsibility in paraphilic disorder. Can the severity of the disorder be assessed with items of standardized prognostic instruments?]. Nervenarzt, 85, 304–311. doi:10.1007/s00115-013-3901-x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, E. W. (1928). Factors determining success or failure on parole. In A. A. Bruce (Ed.), The workings of the indeterminate sentence law and the parole system in Illinois. Springfield, MA: Illinois State Board of Parole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Covington, J. R. (1997). Preventive detention for sex offenders. Illinois Bar Journal, 85, 493–498.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig, L. A., & Beech, A. R. (2010). Towards a best practice in conducting actuarial risk assessments with adult sexual offenders. Aggression and Violet Behavior, 15, 278–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craig, L. A., Beech, A. R., & Browne, K. D. (2006a). Cross validation of the risk matrix 2000 sexual and violent scales. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 21(5), 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craig, L. A., Beech, A. R., & Browne, K. D. (2006b). Evaluating the predictive accuracy of sex offender risk assessment measures on UK a samples: A cross-validation of the risk matrix 2000 scales. Sex offender treatment, 1, 1–16. Retrieved from http://www.sexual-offender-treatment.org/14.0.html

  • Craig, L. A., Browne, K. D., Stringer, I., & Beech, A. (2004). Limitations in actuarial risk assessment of sexual offenders: A methodological note. The British Journal of Forensic Practice, 6, 16–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craig, L. A., Browne, K. D., & Beech, A. R. (2008). Assessing risk in sex offenders: A practitioner’s guide. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Son.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Craig, L. A., Dixon, L., & Gannon, T. A. (2013). What works in offender rehabilitation: An evidenced based approach to assessment and treatment. Wiley-Blackwell: Chichester.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Craig, L. A., Thornton, D., Beech, A., & Browne, K. D. (2007). The relationship of statistical and psychological risk markers to sexual reconviction in child molesters. Criminal Justice & Behavior, 34(3), 314–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawes, R. M., Faust, D., & Meehl, P. E. (1989). Clinical versus actuarial judgment. Science, 243(4899), 1668–1674.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • de Vogel, V., de Ruiter, C., van Beek, D., & Mead, G. (2004). Predictive validity of the SVR-20 and Static-99 in a Dutch sample of treated sex offenders. Law and Human Behavior, 28, 235–251.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Doren, D. M. (2002). Evaluating sex offenders: A manual for civil commitments and beyond. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ducro, C., & Pham, T. (2006). Evaluation of the SORAG and the Static-99 on Belgian sex offenders committed to a forensic facility. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 18, 15–26. doi:10.1177/107906320601800102.

    Google Scholar 

  • East, N. (1949). Society and the criminal. London: H.M.S.O.

    Google Scholar 

  • East, W. N., & Hubert, W. H. (1939). Psychological treatment of crime. HMSO, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eher, R., Matthes, A., Schilling, F., Haubner-MacLean, T., & Rettenberger, M. (2012). Dynamic risk assessment in sexual offenders using STABLE-2000 and the STABLE-2007: An investigation of predictive and incremental validity. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 24, 5–28. doi:10.1177/1079063211403164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eher, R., Rettenberger, M., Gaunersdorfer, K., Haubner-MacLean, T., Matthes, A., Schilling, F., & Mokros, A. (2013). Über die Treffsicherheit der standardisierten Risikoeinschätzungsverahren Static-99 und Stable-2007 bei aus einer Sicherungsmaßnahme entlassenen Sexualstraftätern [On the accuracy of the standardized risk assessment procedures Static-99 and Stable-2007 for sexual offenders released from detention]. Forensische Psychiatrie, Psychologie, Kriminologie, 7, 264–272. doi: 10.1007/s11757-013-0212-9

    Google Scholar 

  • Ericson, R. V., & Haggerty, K. D. (1997). Policing the risk society. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ernits, V. (1922). Rev internat contre l’alcoolisme, 4, 178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falshaw, L. (2002). Assessing reconviction, re-offending and recidivism in a sample of UK sexual offenders. Paper presented at the eleventh annual conference of the division of forensic psychology, Manchester, April 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Firestone, P., Bradford, J. M., McCoy, M., Greenberg, D. M., Larose, M. R., & Curry, S. (1999). Prediction of recidivism in incest offenders. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 14, 511–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glueck, S., & Glueck, E. (1930). 500 criminal careers. Philadelphia, PA: Alfred A Knopf Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grove, W. M. (2005). Clinical versus statistical prediction: The contribution of Paul E. Meehl. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 61(10), 1233–1243.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gore, K. S. (2007). Adjusted actuarial assessment of sex offenders: The impact of clinical overrides on predictive accuracy. Dissertation Abstracts International, 68(07), 4824B. UMI No. 3274898.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grove, W. M., & Meehl, P. E. (1996). Comparative efficiency of informal (subjective, impressionistic) and formal (mechanical, algorithmic) prediction procedures: The clinical-statistical controversy. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 2, 293–323. doi:10.1037/1076-8971.2.2.293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grove, W. M., & Lloyd, M. (2006). Meehl’s contribution to clinical versus statistical prediction. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 115, 192–194.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grubin, D. (1998). Sex offending against children: Understanding the risk. Home Office Research Development and Statistics Directorate Research Findings, Police Research Series, Paper 99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haag, A. M. (2005). Do psychological interventions impact on actuarial measures: An analysis of the predictive validity of the Static-99 and Static-2002 on a re-conviction measure of sexual recidivism. Dissertation Abstracts International, 66(08), 4531B. UMI No. NR05662.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannah-Moffat, K., & Shaw, M. (2001). Taking risks: Incorporating gender and culture into the classification and assessment of federally sentenced women in Canada. Ottawa, ON: Status of Women Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, R. K. (1997a). The development of a brief actuarial risk scale for sexual offense recidivism (User Report No. 1997-04). Ottawa, ON: Department of the Solicitor General of Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, R. K. (1997b). The development of a brief actuarial risk scale for sexual offense recidivism (User Report No. 1997-04). Ottawa, ON: Department of the Solicitor General of Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, R. K. (2001) Age and sexual recidivism: A comparison of rapists and child molesters. (Cat No.: JS42-96/2001). Department of the Solicitor General of Canada. http://www.sgc.gc.ca/EPub/Corr/eAge200101/eAge200101.htm

  • Hanson, R. K. (2007, March). How should risk assessments for sexual offenders be conducted? Paper presented at the Fourth Annual Forensic Psychiatry Conference, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, R. K., & Harris, A. J. R. (2001). A structured approach to evaluating change among sexual offenders. Sexual Abuse, 13, 105–122.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, R. K., Bourgon, G., Helmus, L., & Hodgson, S. (2009). The principles of effective correctional treatment also apply to sexual offenders: A meta-analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36, 865–891. doi:10.1177/0093854809338545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, R. K., & Bussière, M. T. (1998). Predicting relapse: A meta-analysis of sexual offender recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 348–362.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, R. K., & Harris, A. J. R. (2000). Where should we intervene? Dynamic predictors of sexual offence recidivism. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 27, 6–35. doi:10.1177/0093854800027001002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, R. K., Harris, A. J. R., Scott, T. L., & Helmus, L. (2007). Assessing the risk of sexual offenders on community supervision: The Dynamic Supervision Project (Corrections research user report 2007-05). Ottawa, ON: Public Safety Canada. Retrieved from http://www.publicsafety.gc.ca/res/cor/rep/_fl/crp2007-05-en.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, R. K., & Morton-Bourgon, K. (2005). Predictors of sexual recidivism: An updated meta-analysis (Corrections Research, Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness Canada, Ottawa, Canada). Retrieved April 6, 2005, from http://www .psepc-sppcc.gc.ca/publications/corrections/pdf/200402_e.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, R. K., & Morton-Bourgon, K. (2007). The accuracy of recidivism risk assessment for sexual offenders: A meta-analysis (Corrections Research User Report No. 2007-01). Ottawa, ON: Public Safety Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, R. K., & Morton-Bourgon, K. (2009). The accuracy of recidivism risk assessments for sexual offenders: A meta-analysis of 118 prediction studies. Psychological Assessment, 21, 1–21. doi:10.1037/a0014421.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, R. K., & Scott, H. (1995). Assessing perspective-taking among sexual offenders, non-sexual criminal and non-offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 7, 259–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, R. K., & Thornton, D. (2000). Improving risk assessment for sex offenders: A comparison of three actuarial scales. Law and Human Behavior, 24, 119–136. doi:10.1023/A:1005482921333.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hare, R. (1991). Manual for the psychopathy checklist-revised (PCL-R). Toronto, ON: MultiHealth Systems, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, H. (1924). Predicting parole success. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 1, 405–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, A. J. R., & Hanson, R. K. (2010). Clinical, actuarial, and dynamic risk assessment of sexual offenders: Why do things keep changing? Journal of Sexual Aggression, 16, 296–310. doi:10.1080/13552600.2010.494772.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, G. T., & Rice, M. E. (2003). Actuarial assessment of risk among sex offenders. In R. A. Prentky, E. S. Janus, & M. C. Seto (Eds.), Sexually coercive behavior: Understanding and management (Vol. 989, pp. 198–210). New York, NY: New York Academy of Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, S. D., Kropp, P. R., Laws, D. R., Klaver, J., Logan, C., & Watt, K. A. (2003). The risk for sexual violence protocol (RSVP): Structured professional guidelines for assessing risk of sexual violence. Burnaby: Mental Health, Law, and Policy Institute, Simon Fraser University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, S., Laws, D. R., & Kropp, P. R. (2003). The promise and the peril of sex offender risk assessment. In T. Ward, D. R. Laws, & S. M. Hudson (Eds.), Sexual deviance: Issues and controversies (pp. 207–225). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hood, R., Shute, S., Feilzer, M., & Wilcox, A. (2002). Sex offenders emerging from long-term imprisonment—A study of their long-term reconviction rates and of parole board members’ judgements of their risk. British Journal of Criminology, 42(2), 371–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hooton, E. A. (1939). The American criminal. An anthropological study. vol. 1. The native criminal of native parentage. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janus, E. A., & Meehl, P. E. (1997). Assessing the legal standard for predictions of dangerousness in sex offender commitment proceedings. Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 3, 33–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kingston, D. A., Yates, P. M., Firestone, P., Babchishin, K., & Bradford, J. (2008). Long term predictive validity of the Risk Matrix 2000: A comparison with the Static-99 and the Sex Offender Risk Appraisal Guide. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 20, 466–484. doi:10.1177/1079063208325206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koehler, J. J. (1996). The base rate fallacy reconsidered. Descriptive, normative, and methodological challenges. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 19, 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langton, C. M., Barbaree, H. E., Harkins, L., & Peacock, E. J. (2006). Sexual offenders’ response to treatment and its association with recidivism as a function of psychopathy. Sexual Abuse, 18, 99–120.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Langton, C. M., Barbaree, H. E., Seto, M. C., Peacock, E. J., Harkins, L., & Hansen, K. T. (2007). Actuarial assessment of risk for reoffense among adult sex offenders: Evaluating the predictive accuracy of the Static-2002 and five other instruments. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34, 37–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laws, D. R., & Ward, T. (2010). Desistance from Sex offending: Alternatives to throwing away the keys. New York City: Guilford Press. Desistance from sexual offending.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malamuth, N. M., & Brown, L. M. (1994). Sexually aggressive men’s perception of women’s communication: Testing three explanations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 699–712.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mann, R. E., Hanson, R. K., & Thornton, D. (2010). Assessing risk for sexual recidivism: Some proposals on the nature of psychologically meaningful risk factors. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 22, 191–217. doi:10.1177/1079063210366039.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meehl, P. E. (1954). Clinical versus statistical prediction: A theoretical analysis and a review of the evidence. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Meehl, P. E., & Rosen, A. (1955). Antecedent probability and the efficiency of psychometric signs, patterns or cutting scores. Psychological Bulletin., 52, 194–216.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, H. A., Amenta, A., & Conroy, M. (2005). Sexually violent predator evaluations: Empirical evidence, strategies for professionals, and research directions. Law and Human Behavior, 29, 29–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • National Parole Board, (2004). Evaluation report for the national parole board’s effective corrections and citizen engagement initiatives 2000–2003. Retrieved electronically on 30th October 2008. Retrieved from: http://www.npbcnlc.gc.ca/rprts/pdf/ecce_2000_2003/ecce_2000_2003_e.pdf

  • Nunes, K. L., & Babchishin, K. M. (2012). Construct validity of stable-2000 and stable-2007. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 24, 29–45. doi:10.1177/1079063211404921.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phenix, A., Doren, D., Helmus, L., Hanson, R. K., & Thornton, D. (2008).Coding rules for Static-2002. Retrieved June 2015, from http://www.static99.org/pdfdocs/static2002codingrules.pdf

  • Pithers, W. D., Kashima, K. M., Cumming, G. F., & Beal, L. S. (1988). Relapse prevention: A method of enhancing maintenance of change in sex offenders. In A. C. Salter (Ed.), Treating child sex offenders and victims: A practical guide (pp. 131–170). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prentky, R. A., & Burgess, A. W. (2000). Forensic management of sexual offenders: Perspectives in sexuality, behavior, research and therapy. New York, NY: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Prentky, R. A., & Knight, R. A. (1991). Identifying critical dimensions for discriminating among rapists. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 643–661.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Prentky, R. A., Lee, A. F. S., Knight, R. A., & Cerce, O. (1997). Recidivism rates among child molesters and rapists: A methodological analysis. Law and Human Behaviour, 21(6), 635–659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Proulx, J., Pellerin, B., McKibben, A., Aubut, J., & Ouimet, M. (1999). Recidivism in sexual aggressors: Static and dynamic predictors of recidivism in sexual aggressors. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 11, 117–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinsey, V. L., Harris, G. T., Rice, M. E., & Cormier, C. A. (1998). Violent offenders: Appraising and managing risk. Washington, DC: American Psychology Association.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Quinsey, V. L., Harris, G. T., Rice, M. E., & Cormier, C. (2006). Violent offenders: Appraising and managing risk (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rettenberger, M., Boer, D. P., & Eher, R. (2011). The predictive accuracy of risk factors in the Sexual Violence Risk-20 (SVR-20). Criminal Justice and Behavior, 38, 1009–1027. doi:10.1177/0093854811416908.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rettenberger, M., Matthes, A., Boer, D. P., & Eher, R. (2010). Actuarial recidivism risk assessment and sexual delinquency: A comparison of five risk assessment tools in different sexual offender subtypes. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 54, 169–186. doi:10.1177/0306624X08328755.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rice, M. E., & Harris, G. T. (1997). Cross-validation and extension of the violence risk appraisal guide for child molesters and rapists. Law and Human Behavior, 21, 231–241.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sarbin, T. R. (1942). A contribution to the study of actuarial and individual methods of prediction. The American Journal of Sociology, 48, 593–602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarbin, T. R. (1944). The logic of prediction in psychology. Psychological Review, 51, 210–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer, J. (1966). Measurement and prediction: Clinical and statistical. Psychological Bulletin, 66, 178–200. doi:10.1037/h0023624.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Singer, J. C., Boer, D. P., & Rettenberger, M. (2013). A convergent approach to sex offender risk assessment. In K. Harrison & B. Rainey (Eds.), The Wiley-Blackwell handbook of legal and ethical aspects of Sex offender treatment and management (pp. 341–355). New York, NY: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sjöstedt, G., & Långström, N. (2002). Assessment of risk for criminal recidivism among rapists: A comparison of four different measures. Psychology Crime and Law, 8, 25–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skelton, A., Riley, D., Wales, D., & Vess, J. (2006). Assessing risk for sexual offenders in New Zealand: Development and validation of a computer-scored risk measure. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 12, 277–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stadtland, C., Hollweg, M., Kleindienst, N., Dietl, J., Reich, U., & Nedopil, N. (2005). Risk assessment and prediction of violent and sexual recidivism in sex offenders: Long-term predictive validity of four risk assessment instruments. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology, 16, 92–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szmukler, G. (2001). Violence risk prediction in practice. British Journal of Psychiatry, 178, 84–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thornton, D. (2002). Constructing and testing a framework for dynamic risk assessment. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 14, 139–153. doi:10.1177/107906320201400205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornton, D., & Beech, A. R. (2002). Integrating statistical and psychological factors through the structured risk assessment model. Paper presented at the 21st annual research and treatment conference, Association of the Treatment of Sexual Abusers, 2–5 Oct, Montreal, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornton, D., Mann, R., Webster, S., Blud, L., Travers, R., Friendship, C., & Erikson, M. (2003). Distinguishing and combining risks for sexual and violent recidivism. In R. A. Prentky, E. S. Janus, & M. C. Seto (Eds.), Sexually coercive behavior: Understanding and management (Vol. 989, pp. 225–235). New York: New York Academy of Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tully, R. J., Browne, K. D., & Craig, L. A. (2015). An examination of the predictive validity of the structured assessment of risk and need– treatment needs analysis (SARN-TNA) in England and Wales. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 42(5), 509–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vrana, G. C., Sroga, M., & Guzzo, L. (2008). Predictive validity of the LSI–OR among a sample of adult male sexual assaulters. North Bay, ON: Nipissing University. Unpublished manuscript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wakeling, H., Beech, A. R., & Freemantle, N. (2013). Investigating treatment change and its relationship to recidivism in a sample of 3773 sex offenders in the UK. Psychology Crime and Law, 19(3), 233–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, T. (2002). Good lives and the rehabilitation of offenders: Promises and problems. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 7, 513–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, T., & Beech, A. R. (2004). The etiology of risk: A preliminary model. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 16, 271–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, T., & Maruna, S. (2007). Rehabilitation: Beyond the risk assessment paradigm. London, UK: Routledge Peterson & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, T., Hudson, S. M., & Keenan, T. (1998). A self-regulation model of the sexual offense process. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 10, 141–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, T., Louden, K., Hudson, S. M., & Marshall, W. L. (1995). A descriptive model of the offense chain for child molesters. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 10, 452–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, T., Mesler, J., & Yates, P. (2007). Reconstructing the risk-need-responsivity model: A theoretical elaboration and evaluation. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 12, 208–228. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2006.07.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warner, S. B. (1923). Factors determining parole from the Massachusetts Reformatory. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 14(2), 172–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webster, S. D., Mann, R. E., Carter, A. J., Long, J., Milner, R. J., O’Brein, M. D., et al. (2006). Inter-rater reliability of dynamic risk assessment with sexual offenders. Psychology Crime and Law, 12, 439–452.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittman, M. P., & Steinberg, L. (1944). Follow-up of an objective evaluation of prognosis in dementia praecox and manic-repressive psychoses. Elgin Papers, 5, 216–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, S. C. P., Olver, M. E., Nicholaichuk, T. P., & Gordon, A. (2003). The violence risk scale: Sexual offender version (VRS-SO). Saskatoon: Regional Psychiatric Centre and University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wormith, S. J., Hogg, S., & Guzzo, L. (2012). The predictive validity of a general risk/needs assessment inventory on sexual offender recidivism and an exploration of the professional override. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 39, 1511–1538. doi:10.1177/0093854812455741.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leam A. Craig .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Craig, L.A., Rettenberger, M. (2016). A Brief History of Sexual Offender Risk Assessment. In: Laws, D., O'Donohue, W. (eds) Treatment of Sex Offenders. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25868-3_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics