Skip to main content

Apogee: Application Ontology Generation with Size Optimization

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 688 Accesses

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 553))

Abstract

To obtain runnable knowledge – convertible into executable software – from the highest abstraction level of an application, one should start with a neat set of application ontologies. But the latter are not readily available in the literature. One needs to generate dedicated and smaller application ontologies from larger generic domain ontologies. The main problem to be solved is to optimize the size of the generated application ontologies as a trade-off between two opposing tendencies: to enlarge the selected domain ontology segments to include most relationships between relevant concepts, while reducing the same segments to exclude irrelevant terms. This work describes a chain of algorithms and a series of heuristic rules to reach the proposed solution. Finally, case studies are used to actually illustrate the whole approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Chang, E., Hussain, F.K., Dillon, T.: Reputation ontology for reputation systems. In: Meersman, R., Tari, Z. (eds.) OTM-WS 2005. LNCS, vol. 3762, pp. 957–966. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. dataTXT-NEX – dandelion named entity extraction API. https://dandelion.eu/products/datatxt/nex/demo/

  3. dataTXT-CL – dandelion text classification API. https://dandelion.eu/products/datatxt/cl/demo/

  4. Decker, S., Erdmann, M., Fensel, D., Studer, R.: Ontobroker: ontology based access to distributed and semi-structured information. In: Proceedings of the DS-8, pp. 351–369 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  5. De Rosso, S.P., Jackson, D.: What’s Wrong with Git? A Conceptual Design Analysis. Onward! 2013, pp. 37–51 (2013). doi:10.1145/2509578.2509584

  6. Ding, L., Finin, T., Joshi, A., Peng, Y., Cost, R.C., Sachs, J., Pan, R., Reddivari, P., Doshi, V.: Swoogle: a semantic web search and metadata engine. In: Proceedings of the CIKM 2004. ACM (2004). http://swoogle.umbc.edu/

  7. Exman, I.: Interestingness – a unifying paradigm – bipolar function composition. In: Fred, A. (ed.) Proceedings of the International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Information Retrieval, KDIR 2009, pp. 196–201 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Exman, I.: Opinion-ontologies: short and sharp. Accepted for Publication in 6th International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Ontology Development, KEOD (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Exman, I., Yagel, R.: ROM: an approach to self-consistency verification of a runnable ontology model. In: Fred, A., Dietz, J.L.G., Liu, K., Filipe, J. (eds.) IC3K 2012. CCIS, vol. 415, pp. 271–283. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Guarino, N.: Understanding, building and using ontologies. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 46, 293–310 (1997). doi:10.1006/ijhc.1996.0091

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Guarino, N.: Semantic matching: formal ontological distinctions for information organization, extraction and integration. In: Pazienza, M.T. (ed.) SCIE 1997. LNCS, vol. 1299, pp. 139–170. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Guarino, N.: Formal ontology in information systems. In: Guarino, N. (ed.) Formal Ontology in Information Systems, pp. 3–18. IOS Press, Amsterdam (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jean-Mary, Y.R., Shironoshita, E.P., Kabuka, M.R.: Ontology matching with semantic verification. Web. Semant. 7(3), 235–251 (2009). doi:10.1016/j.websem.2009.04.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Luke, S., Spector, L., Rager, D. Hendler, J.: Ontology-based web agents. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Autonomous Agents, AA 1997, pp. 59–66 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Nowakowski, W., Śmiałek, M., Ambroziewicz, A., Straszak, T.: Requirements-level language and tools for capturing software system essence. Comput. Sci. Inf. Syst. 10(4), 1499–1524 (2013). doi:10.2298/CSIS121210062N

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Nguyen, V.: Ontologies and information systems: a literature survey. Technical report DSTO-TN-1002, Australian Government, Defence Science and Technology Organization (2011). http://digext6.defence.gov.au/dspace/bitstream/1947/10144/1/DSTO-TN-1002PR.pdf

  17. Protégé - A free, open-source ontology editor and framework for building intelligent systems. http://protege.stanford.edu/

  18. ReDSeeDS – Requirements-Driven Software Development System (2014). http://smog.iem.pw.edu.pl/redseeds/

  19. Stop-words list in English. http://xpo6.com/list-of-english-stop-words/

  20. Stumme, G., Maedche, A.: FCA-MERGE: bottom-up merging of ontologies. In: Proceedings of the 17th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI 2001, pp. 225–230 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Svab-Zamazal, O., Svatek, V., Meilicker, C., Stuckenschmidt, H.: Testing the impact of pattern-based ontology refactoring on ontology matching results. In: Proceedings of the Ontology Matching Workshop, hosted by ISWC 2008, 7th International Semantic Web Conference, pp. 229–233 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Tijerino, Y.A., Embley, D.W., Lonsdale, D.W., Ding, Y., Nagy, G.: Towards ontology generation from tables. World Wide Web: Internet Web Inf. Syst. 8, 261–285 (2005). doi:10.1007/s11280-005-0360-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wynne, M., Hellesoy, A.: The Cucumber Book: Behaviour Driven Development for Testers and Developers, Pragmatic Programmer, New York, USA, (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Yagel, R., Litovka, A., Exman, I.: KoDEgen: a knowledge driven engineering code generating tool. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Software Knowledge, SKY 2013, hosted by IC3K, Vilamoura, Portugal, pp. 24–33 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Iaakov Exman .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Exman, I., Iskusnov, D. (2015). Apogee: Application Ontology Generation with Size Optimization. In: Fred, A., Dietz, J., Aveiro, D., Liu, K., Filipe, J. (eds) Knowledge Discovery, Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management. IC3K 2014. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 553. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25840-9_29

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25840-9_29

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-25839-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-25840-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics