Skip to main content

Interview Based DEMO Axioms’ Benefits Validation: A Regional Government Case Study

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Knowledge Discovery, Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management (IC3K 2014)

Abstract

This paper has as its background, a practical enterprise change project where the Design and Engineering Methodology for Organizations (DEMO) was used in the initial stage as to give a neutral and concise but comprehensive view of the organization of a local government administration in the process of implementing an e-government project. The main contribution presented in this paper is an interview based qualitative validation of some of DEMO’s axioms and claimed benefits – something that, to our knowledge has never been done up to now. Namely, we were able to validate DEMO’s qualities of conciseness and comprehensiveness brought about by the transaction and distinction axioms and also the stability of its ontological models which are, by nature, highly abstracted from the human and technological means that implement and operate an organization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Hevner, A.R., March, S.T., Park, J., Ram, S.: Design science in information systems research. MIS Q. 28, 75–106 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hevner, A.: A three cycle view of design science research. Scand. J. Inf. Syst. 19, 87–92 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dietz, J.L.G.: Enterprise Ontology: Theory and Methodology. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Patton, M.Q.: Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Creswell, J.W., Plano Clark, V.L.: Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Johnson, R.B., Onwuegbuzie, A.J.: Mixed methods research: a research paradigm whose time has come. Educ. Researcher 33, 14–26 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kvale, S.: InterViews: An Introduction to Qualitative Research Interviewing. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dietz, J.L.G.: Is it PHI TAO PSI or Bullshit? Presented at the Methodologies for Enterprise Engineering symposium, Delft (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dietz, J.L.G.: On the Nature of Business Rules. Advances in Enterprise Engineering I. 1–15 (2008a)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dietz, J.L.G., Albani, A.: Basic notions regarding business processes and supporting information systems. Requirements Eng. 10, 175–183 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dietz, J.L.G.: Architecture - Building strategy into design. Academic Service - Sdu Uitgevers bv (2008b)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Aveiro, D., Pinto, D.: A case study based new DEMO way of working and collaborative tooling. In: 2013 IEEE 15th Conference on Business Informatics (CBI), pp. 21–26 (2013a)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Aveiro, D., Pinto, D.: An e-Government project case study: validation of DEMO’s qualities and method/tool improvements. In: Harmsen, F., Proper, H.A. (eds.) PRET 2013. LNBIP, vol. 151, pp. 1–15. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Aveiro .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Aveiro, D., Pinto, D. (2015). Interview Based DEMO Axioms’ Benefits Validation: A Regional Government Case Study. In: Fred, A., Dietz, J., Aveiro, D., Liu, K., Filipe, J. (eds) Knowledge Discovery, Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management. IC3K 2014. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 553. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25840-9_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25840-9_26

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-25839-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-25840-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics