Abstract
This paper starts with the acknowledgment that resilience is still a confusing concept, difficult to demonstrate, but a necessity when considering community’s development programming. It then presents the innovative approach developed by the INGO Plan International while developing a toolbox addressing both programming and accountability requirements regarding resilience, i.e. combining process-oriented and performance-oriented dimensions. At first it presents the strategic and programmatic vision of Plan for resilience—child-centered approach, based on the characterization of resilient communities and on a two-levels review process (the “what” and the “how”) of programming activities. As a second part, specific processes and tools—under construction—are described, that are designed to support programming teams in: (i) screening existing programmes/projects from the resilience perspective, (ii) design projects so that they contribute to resilience building. As a conclusion, the opportunity brought upon by the resilience debate to rethink the development paradigm from a community and human perspective is highlighted. Resilience building must be understood as interfering with causal pathways of change and not only as a linear programming process towards pre-defined outcomes. To make such a shift happen on the ground, tools are needed—translating academic knowledge on resilience into practitioners’ toolbox; this paper aims at contributing to connect the dots, providing a framework for a reality check on the field of development programming.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
ARUP (2014) City resilience framework. ARUP, London
Barrett CB, Constasa MA (2013) Toward a theory of resilience for international development applications – draft paper. Cornell University, Ithaca
Folke C (2006) Resilience: the emergence of a perspective for social–ecological systems analysed. Glob Environ Chang 16:253–267. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959378006000379. Accessed 28 June 2015
Interagency Resilience Working Group (IARWG) (2012) The characteristics of resilience building – A discussion paper, London
Ocharan O (2014) Fishing a fish called “resilience”. Plan International, London
Strengthening Climate Resilience (SRC) (2010) The resilience renaissance. Institute of Development Studies, Brighton
Vaitla B, Tesfay G, Rounseville M, Maxwell D (2012) Resilience and livelihoods change in Tigray Ethiopia. Feinstein International Center, Tufts University, Somerville
Villanueva PS (2011) Learning to ADAPT: monitoring and evaluation approaches in climate change adaptation and disaster risk reduction – challenges, gaps and ways forward, Strengthening Climate Resilience (SCR), Discussion Paper 9, Institute of Development Studies, Brighton
Walker B, Holling CS, Carpenter SR, Kinzig A (2004) Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social–ecological systems. Ecol Soc 9(2):5. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss2/art5. Accessed 28 June 2015
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ocharan, J., Guiran, G., Wright, A. (2016). Mainstreaming Resilience into Development Programming: A Practitioner’s Perspective. In: Leal Filho, W. (eds) Innovation in Climate Change Adaptation. Climate Change Management. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25814-0_22
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25814-0_22
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-25812-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-25814-0
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)