Skip to main content

Adapting to Climate Change: Getting More from Spatial Planning

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Innovation in Climate Change Adaptation

Part of the book series: Climate Change Management ((CCM))

Abstract

Given the severity of future climate change projections and associated risks to human and natural systems, societies are now faced with a strong imperative to develop adaptation policies and actions in response. Spatial planning, which is the process through which the development and use of land is visualised, negotiated and regulated, has an important role to play in adapting to the changing climate. Despite positive steps forward in some locations, there remains a gap between spatial planning’s potential capacity to support the achievement of adaptation goals and the realisation of this role in practice. This paper reports on the findings of an online Delphi survey undertaken to build understanding of the relationship between spatial planning and climate change adaptation. The survey secured the input of over 70 academics, planners and policy makers working across these fields in ten different countries. Its results offer insights on barriers inhibiting spatial planning’s contribution to adaptation, which range from overarching systemic issues through to those concerning the detailed workings of the planning system. The Delphi survey also identified solutions that could help build the capacity of spatial planning to progress the adaptation agenda. Approaches include enhancing the adaptation knowledge, skills and technical capacity of planners and applying different concepts and methods to align spatial planning more closely with adaptation goals. In presenting and analysing the results of the Delphi survey, the aim of this paper is to help build the capacity of policy makers, practitioners and researchers to adapt spaces and places for the changing climate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The weighted mean is calculated by summing the product of each Likert number and the number of times it was selected (1*a + 2*b + 3*c…) and dividing by the total number of answers.

References

  • Adger N (2003) Social capital, collective action and adaptation to climate change. Econ Geogr 79(4):387–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allmendinger P, Haughton G (2011) Post-political spatial planning in England: a crisis of consensus? Trans Inst Br Geogr 37(1):89–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birkmann J, Garschagen M, Krass F, Quang N (2010) Adaptive urban governance: new challenges for the second generation of urban adaptation strategies to climate change. Sustain Sci 5(2):185–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanco H, McCarney P, Parnell S, Schmidt M, Seto K (2011) The role of urban land in climate change. In: Rozensweig C, Solecki W, Hammer S (eds) First urban climate change research network (UCCRN) assessment report on climate change in cities. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Boardman B, Darby S, Killip G, Hinnells M, Jardine C, Palmer J, Sinden G (2005) 40 % house. Environmental Change Institute, The University of Oxford, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulkeley H, Broto V (2013) Governing by experiment? Global cities and the governing of climate change. Trans Inst Br Geogr 38(3):361–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter JG (2011) Climate change adaptation in European cities. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 3(3):193–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter JG, Cavan G, Connelly A, Guy S, Handley J, Kazmierczak A (2014) Climate change and the city: building capacity for urban adaptation. Prog Plan 95:1–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corfee-Morlot J, Cochran I, Hallegatte S, Teasdale PJ (2011) Multilevel risk governance and urban adaptation policy. Clim Chang 104(1):169–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • URS Corporation Limited (2009) Adapting energy, transport and water infrastructure to the long-term impacts of climate change. RMP/5456. Defra, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Crisp J, Pelletier D, Duffield C, Adams A, Nagy S (1997) The Delphi method? Nurs Res 46:116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davoudi S, Crawford J, Mehmood A (2010) Planning for climate change: strategies for mitigation and adaptation for spatial planners. Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Doria MF, Boyd E, Tompkins EL, Adger WN (2009) Using expert elicitation to define successful adaptation to climate change. Environ Sci Pol 12(7):810–819

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Environment Agency (EEA) (2012) Urban adaptation to climate change in Europe: challenges and opportunities for cities together with supportive national and European policies. EEA report, no. 2/2012. Office for Official Publications of the European Union, Luxembourg

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans B (1997) From town planning to environmental planning. In: Blowers A, Evans B (eds) Town planning into the 21st century. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Forest Research (2010) Benefits of green infrastructure. Report by Forest Research. Forest Research, Farnham

    Google Scholar 

  • Gething B (2010) Design for future climate: opportunities for adaptation in the built environment. Technology Strategy Board, Swindon

    Google Scholar 

  • Gleeson B (2012) ‘Make no little plans’: anatomy of planning ambition and prospect. Geogr Res 50(3):242–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu CC, Sandford BA (2007) The Delphi technique: making sense of consensus. Pract Assess Res Eval 12(10):1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2014) Climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability summary for policy makers. IPCC, Geneva

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kaźmierczak A, Carter JG (2010) Adaptation to climate change using green infrastructure, a database of case studies. The Town and Country Planning Association, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemieux C, Scott D (2011) Changing climate, challenging choices: identifying and evaluating climate change adaptation options for protected areas management in Ontario, Canada. Environ Manag 48(4):675–690

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller G (2001) The development of indicators for sustainable tourism: results of a Delphi survey of tourism researchers. Tour Manag 22:351–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravetz J (2000) City-region 2020: integrated planning for a sustainable environment. Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Reckien D, Flacke J, Dawson RJ, Heidrich O, Olazabal M, Foley A, Hamann JJ-P, Orru H, Salvia M, Hurtado SDG, Geneletti D, Pietrapertosa F (2014) Climate change response in Europe: what’s the reality? Analysis of adaptation and mitigation plans from 200 urban areas in 11 countries. Clim Chang 122:331–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Royal Academy of Engineering (RAE) (2011) Engineering the future. Infrastructure, engineering and climate change adaptation—ensuring services in an uncertain future. The Royal Academy of Engineering, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution (RCEP) (2002) Environmental Planning. HMSO, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Rydin Y (2010) Governing for sustainable urban development. Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw R, Colley M, Connell R (2007) Climate change adaptation by design: a guide for sustainable communities. Town and Country Planning Association, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern NH (2007) The economics of climate change: the stern review. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • The Royal Society, The US National Academy of Sciences (2014) Climate change evidence and causes. The Royal Society, The US National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • White I, Alarcon A (2009) Planning policy, sustainable drainage and surface water management: a case study of greater Manchester. Built Environ 35(4):516–530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilenius M, Tirkkonen J (1997) Climate in the making: using Delphi for Finnish climate policy. Futures 29(9):845–862

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson E (2006) Adapting to climate change at the local level: the spatial planning response. Local Environ 11(6):609–625

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The funding to undertake this research was gratefully received from Bruntwood and the Oglesby Charitable Trust (via the EcoCities project) and the European Union (via the INTERREG IVC Green and Blue Space Adaptation for Urban Areas and Eco Towns project – GraBS). Finally, our thanks go to Graham Haughton for his valuable comments on an earlier version of this chapter.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeremy Carter .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Carter, J., Sherriff, G. (2016). Adapting to Climate Change: Getting More from Spatial Planning. In: Leal Filho, W. (eds) Innovation in Climate Change Adaptation. Climate Change Management. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25814-0_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics