Skip to main content

Time-dependent Perturbations in Quantum Mechanics

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Advanced Quantum Mechanics

Part of the book series: Graduate Texts in Physics ((GTP))

  • 107k Accesses

Abstract

The development of time-dependent perturbation theory was initiated by Paul Dirac’s early work on the semi-classical description of atoms interacting with electromagnetic fields. Dirac, Wheeler, Heisenberg, Feynman and Dyson developed it into a powerful set of techniques for studying interactions and time evolution in quantum mechanical systems which cannot be solved exactly. It is used for the quantitative description of phenomena as diverse as proton-proton scattering, photo-ionization of materials, scattering of electrons off lattice defects in a conductor, scattering of neutrons off nuclei, electric susceptibilities of materials, neutron absorption cross sections in a nuclear reactor etc. The list is infinitely long. Time-dependent perturbation theory is an extremely important tool for calculating properties of any physical system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    P.A.M. Dirac, Proc. Roy. Soc. London A 112, 661 (1926).

  2. 2.

    F.J. Dyson, Phys. Rev. 75, 1736 (1949). Equation (13.1) gives three different representations of the time evolution operator. Equivalence of these representations is demonstrated in equations (13.3, 13.4) and in Problem 13.1.

  3. 3.

    The transformation law for operators from the Schrödinger picture into the interaction picture implies H D (t) ≡ V D (t). The notation V D (t) is therefore also often used for H D (t).

  4. 4.

    If the perturbation V (t) contains directional information (e.g. polarization of an incoming photon or the direction of an electric field), then we might also like to calculate probabilities for the direction of dissociation of the hydrogen atom. This direction would be given by the \(\boldsymbol{k}\) vector of relative motion between the electron and the proton after separation. For the calculation of directional information we would have to combine the spherical Coulomb waves | k, ℓ, m〉 into states which approximate plane wave states \(\vert \boldsymbol{k}\rangle\) at infinity, similar to the construction of incoming approximate plane wave states in Section 13.5, see also the discussion of the photoeffect in [3].

  5. 5.

    Recall that the notation tacitly implies dependence of the operators V and W on x and p (just like we usually write H instead of H(x, p) for a Hamilton operator).

  6. 6.

    G. Wentzel, Z. Phys. 43, 524 (1927).

  7. 7.

    See the discussion after equation (13.38) for an explanation why we can deal with monochromatic perturbations as abridged non-hermitian operators.

  8. 8.

    J.R. Oppenheimer, Z. Phys. 55, 725 (1929).

  9. 9.

    W. Wessel, Annalen Phys. 397, 611 (1930); E.C.G. Stückelberg, P.M. Morse, Phys. Rev. 36, 16 (1930); M. Stobbe, Annalen Phys. 399, 661 (1930).

  10. 10.

    Alternatively, we could have used box normalization for the incoming plane waves, \(\langle \boldsymbol{x}\vert \boldsymbol{k}\rangle =\exp (\mathrm{i}\boldsymbol{k} \cdot \boldsymbol{ x})/\sqrt{V}\) both in \(dw_{\boldsymbol{k}\rightarrow \boldsymbol{k}'}\) and in \(\boldsymbol{j}\) ( ⇒ \(\boldsymbol{j} = \hslash \boldsymbol{k}/(mV ) =\boldsymbol{ v}/V\)), or we could have rescaled both \(dw_{\boldsymbol{k}\rightarrow \boldsymbol{k}'}\) and \(\boldsymbol{j}\) with the conversion factor 8π 3∕V to make both quantities separately dimensionally correct, \([dw_{\boldsymbol{k}\rightarrow \boldsymbol{k}'}] =\mathrm{ s}^{-1}\), \([\boldsymbol{j}] =\mathrm{ cm}^{-2}\mathrm{s}^{-1}\). All three methods yield the same result for the scattering cross section, of course.

  11. 11.

    M.V. Berry, Proc. Roy. Soc. London A 392, 45 (1984).

Bibliography

  1. H.A. Bethe, E.E. Salpeter, Quantum Mechanics of One- and Two-Electron Atoms (Springer, Berlin, 1957)

    Google Scholar 

  2. J. Orear, A.H. Rosenfeld, R.A. Schluter, Nuclear Physics: A Course Given by Enrico Fermi at the University of Chicago (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1950)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dick, R. (2016). Time-dependent Perturbations in Quantum Mechanics. In: Advanced Quantum Mechanics. Graduate Texts in Physics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25675-7_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics