Abstract
The idea of university-assisted community schools (Harkavy and colleagues chapter), together with the other chapters that attest to the importance of higher education institutions in the development of community schools, community learning centers, extended service schools, and multi-service schools, recommend a particular way of thinking and planning. Systems thinking and systems planning models proceed with the quest to identify and connect all relevant parts of a system; and with the expectation that each part influences and is influenced by the others. Higher education overall and the universities in particular merit a fresh look with this systems perspective in mind, while keeping in view a compelling idea: Closing two achievement gaps entails preparing more young people to enter and complete postsecondary education with advanced competence. To maximize postsecondary education's contributions to this important international agenda, while also benefiting higher education institutions in myriad ways, the idea of “outreach and engagement” has gained international salience. Examples of outreach and engagement strategies are provided, including many derived from the model of university-assisted community schools. A new idea called the “Quadruple Helix” builds on the idea of higher education institutions as economic development drivers and incubators for innovative public policies. Perhaps above all, the idea of “the community school-assisted university” opens new avenues for needed changes in higher education, starting with the schools, colleges, and departments of education and extending to schools and departments of social work, counselling, nursing and other professional schools. The preparation of partnership and collaboration specialists is a top priority, and it provides important opportunities for innovative programs, policies and research agendas. Another need is for tailor-made professional development programs for higher education faculty members because: (1) Most faculty lack preparation for the new school design; and (2) Until such time as faculty are prepared and modify their preparation programs, preservice education programs will remain out of step with the new school design featured in this book, constraining progress and slowing scale-up and scale-out initiatives.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Acar, M., Guo, C., & Yang, K. (2012). Accountability in voluntary partnerships: To whom and for what? Public Organization Review, 12(2), 157–174.
Allen-Scott, L. K., Hatfield, J. M., & McIntyre, L. (2014). A scoping review of unintended harm associated with public health interventions: Towards a typology and an understanding of underlying factors. International Journal of Public Health, 59(1), 1–12. doi:10.1007/s00038-013-0526-6.
Bardach, E. (1998). Getting agencies to work together: The practice and theory of managerial craftsmanship. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution Press.
Bargerstock, B.A., Doberneck, D., & Zimmerman, D.L. (2007, October). University outreach and engagement: Defining terms, addressing quality, collecting data, and telling stories. Association for Continuing Higher Education Annual Meeting, Roanoke, VA. http://ncsue.msu.edu/files/ache_bbdddz_103007.pdf
Barr, H., Koppel, I., Reeves, S., Hammich, M., & Freeth, D. (2005). Effective interprofessional education: Argument, assumption, evidence. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.
Becker, G. S. (1993). Human capital (3rd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Bennett, L.M., Gadlin, H., & Levine-Finley, S. (2010). Collaboration and team science: A field guide. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health. Downloaded July 2013 from https://ccrod.cancer.gov/confluence/download/attachments/47284665/TeamScience_FieldGuide.pdf
Briar-Lawson, K., Lawson, H. A., Hennon, C., & Jones, A. (2001). Family-centered policies and practices: International implications. New York: Columbia University Press.
Bryk, A. S., Gomez, L. M., Grunow, A., & LeMahieu, P. G. (2015). Learning to improve: How America’s schools can get better at getting better. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
Cheadle, A., Senter, S., Solomon, L, Beery, W., & Schwartz, P. (2005). A qualitative exploration of alternative strategies for building community health partnerships: Collaboration- versus issue-oriented approaches. Journal of Urban Health: Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, online first, doi:10.1093/jurban/jti120
Crow, M. M., & Dabars, W. B. (2015). Designing the new American university. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Day, C., Van Veen, D., & Sim, W. K. (Eds.). (1997). Teachers and teaching: International perspectives on school reform and teacher education. Leuven, Belgium: Garant.
Edmondson, J., & Zimpher, N. (2014). Striving together: Early lessons in achieving collective impact in education. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
Edwards, A., Lunt, I., & Stamou, E. (2010). Inter-professional work and expertise: New roles at the boundaries of schools. British Educational Research Journal, 36(1), 27–45. doi:10.1080/01411920902834134.
Etzkowitz, H. (2008). The triple helix: University-industry-government innovation in action. New York: Routledge.
Fullan, M., Rincon-Gallardo, S., & Hargreaves, A. (2015). Professional capital as accountability. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 23(15), 1–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v23.1998.
Goodlad, J. (1994). Educational renewal: Better teachers, better schools. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Gray, B. (2008). Intervening to improve inter-organizational partnerships. In S. Cropper, M. Ebers, C. Huxham, & P. Ring (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of inter-organizational relations (pp. 661–690). New York: Oxford University Press.
Hall, K. L., Feng, A., Moser, R., Stokols, D., & Taylor, B. (2008). Moving the science of team science forward: Collaboration and creativity. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 35(2 Suppl), S243–S249. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2008.05.007.
Harkavy, I., Hartley, M., Hodges, R. A., & Weeks, J. (2013). The promise of university-assisted schools to transform American schooling: A report from the field, 1985–2012. Peabody Journal of Education, 88, 525–540. doi:10.1080/0161956X.2013.834789.
Klein, J. (1990). Interdisciplinarity: History, theory, and practice. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University.
Kliewer, B. W., Sandmann, L. R., & PaduRanga Narasimharao, B. (2013). Corporate-university partnerships: The outreach and engagement model. Hersey, PA: IGI Global.
Knapp, M.S. & Associates. (1998). Paths to partnership: University and community as learners in interprofessional education. New York: Roman & Littlefield.
Kram, K. E., Wasserman, I. C., & Yip, J. (2012). Metaphors of identity and professional practice: Learning from the scholar-practitioner. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 48(3), 304–341. doi:10.1177/0021886312439097.
Lawson, H.A. (in press). A community school research and development agenda to facilitate the redesign of “Ed schools.” Universities and Community Schools.
Lawson, H. (1996a). Expanding the Goodlad/NNER agenda: Interprofessional education and community collaboration in service of vulnerable children, youth and families. Holistic Education Review, 9(1), 20–34.
Lawson, H. A. (1996b). Developing interprofessional education programs: Definitions, assumptions, content and principles. In K. Hooper-Briar & H. Lawson (Eds.), Expanding partnerships for vulnerable children, youth and families (pp. 181–195). Washington, DC: Council on Social Work Education.
Lawson, H. A. (2002). Beyond community involvement and service learning to engaged universities. Universities and Community Schools, 7(1–2), 79–94.
Lawson, H. A. (2010). An appreciation and a selective enhancement of the developing model for university-assisted community schools. Universities and Community Schools, 8(1/2), 5–20.
Lawson, H. A. (2013). Third-generation partnerships for P-16 pipelines and cradle-to-career education systems. Peabody Journal of Education, 88(5), 637–656. www.doi.org/10.1080/0161956X.2013.835187.
Lawson, H.A. (2014, April). A research and development framework for school-linked, interprofessional team collaboration. Paper presented to the American Educational Research Association, Philadelphia.
Lawson, H.A., & Anderson-Butcher, D. (2011, May). Deriving a theory of change from five local P-16 partnerships in Ohio. Paper presented to the Comparative and International Education Society, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Lawson, M. A., & Lawson, H. A. (2013). New conceptual frameworks for student engagement research, policy, and practice. Review of Educational Research, 83(3), 432–479. doi:10.3102/0034654313480891.
Lewin, K. (1951). Field theory in social science: Selected theoretical papers. New York: Harper & Row.
Lewis, C. (2015). What is improvement science? Do we need it in education? Educational Researcher, 44(1), 54–60. doi:10.3102/0013189X15570388.
McGrath, D., Donovan, R., Schaier-Peleg, B., & VanBuskirk, W. (2005). The collaborative advantage: Lessons from K-16 educational reform. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Nelson, I. A., London, R. A., & Strobel, K. R. (2015). Reinventing the role of the university researcher. Educational Researcher, 44(1), 17–26. doi:10.3102/0013189X15570387.
Øvretveit, J., Mathias, P., & Thompson, T. (1997). Interprofessional working for health and social care. New York: Macmillan.
Penuel, W. R., Fishman, B., Cheng, B. H., & Sabelli, N. (2011). Organizing research and development at the intersection of learning, implementation, and design. Educational Researcher, 40(7), 331–337.
Raffo, C. (2014). Improving educational equity in urban contexts. New York: Routledge.
Riemer, M., Kelley, S. D., Casey, S., & Taylor Haynes, K. (2012). Developing effective research-practice partnerships for creating a culture of evidence-based decision making. Administrative Policy in Mental Health, 39, 248–257. doi:10.1007/s10488-011-0368-6.
Roussos, S. T., & Fawcett, S. (2000). A review of collaborative partnerships as a strategy for improving community health. Annual Review of Public Health, 21, 369–402.
Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, Inc.
Senge, P., Cambron-McCabe, N., Lucas, T., Smith, B., Dutton, J., & Kleiner, A. (2012). Schools that learn (2nd ed.). New York: Crown Business.
Tate, W. F. (2012). Research on schools, neighborhoods, and communities. Chicago: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers/The American Educational Research Association.
Taylor, H. L., McGlynn, L., & Luter, G. (2013). Neighborhoods matter: The role of universities in the school reform neighborhood development movement. Peabody Journal of Education, 88(5), 541–563. www.doi.org/10.1080/0161956X.2013.834793.
Van Veen, D. (2006). Vernieuwing van het onderwijs en jeugdbeleid in grote steden: Maatschappelijke urgentie, ontwikkelingsrichting en implicaties voor het hoger beroepsonderwijs. Diemen, The Netherlands: Hogeschool Inholland.
White, J., & Wehlage, G. (1995). Community collaboration: If it is such a good idea, why is it so hard? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 17(1), 23–38.
Whitechurch, C. (2013). Reconstructing identities in higher education: The rise of third space professionals. New York: Routledge.
Zerhouni, E. A. (2005). Translational and clinical science: Time for a new vision. New England Journal of Medicine, 353, 1621–1623. doi:10.1056/NEJMsb053723.
Zimpher, N. L., Percy, S. L., & Brukardt, M. J. (2002). A time for boldness: A story of institutional change. Bolton, MA: Anker.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lawson, H.A., van Veen, D. (2016). The New Design as a Catalyst for Systems Change: Forging New Relationships with Universities and Governments. In: Lawson, H., van Veen, D. (eds) Developing Community Schools, Community Learning Centers, Extended-service Schools and Multi-service Schools. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25664-1_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25664-1_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-25662-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-25664-1
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)