Skip to main content

Bayesian Approach to Evidence Synthesis

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Umbrella Reviews

Abstract

We briefly present the advantages and opportunities available to umbrella reviews from the use of Bayesian techniques while taking into account that the concerns commonly arising in Bayesian meta-analysis procedures are also present in umbrella reviews. This is the case, for example, of sparse data, for which the hierarchical logit-normal model can give very poor results. An additional concern in this context is that of the choice of noninformative priors, which can lead to a significant variation in the final conclusions drawn. Accordingly, this chapter highlights the potential for Bayesian approaches in umbrella reviews, overviews of reviews, and meta-epidemiologic studies while acknowledging their limitations and complexities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ioannidis JPA. Integration of evidence from multiple meta-analyses: a primer on umbrella reviews, treatment networks and multiple treatments meta-analyses. Can Med Assoc J. 2009;181(8):488–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Sutton AJ, Abrams KR. Bayesian methods in meta-analysis and evidence synthesis. Stat Methods Med Res. 2001;10:277–303.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Vázquez-Polo FJ, Moreno E, Negrín MA, Martel M. A Bayesian sensitivity study of risk difference in the meta-analysis of binary outcomes from sparse data. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2015;15(2):317–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lambert PC, Sutton AJ, Burton PR, Abrams KR, Jones DR. How vague is vague? A simulation study of the impact of the use of vague prior distributions in MCMC using WinBUGS. Stat Med. 2005;24:2401–28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Moreno E, Vázquez-Polo FJ, Negrín MA. Objective Bayesian meta-analysis for sparse discrete data. Stat Med. 2014;33:3676–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was partially supported by grant ECO2013-47092 (Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad, Spain).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francisco José Vázquez Polo PhD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Polo, F.J.V., Negrín, M.A., Martel, M. (2016). Bayesian Approach to Evidence Synthesis. In: Biondi-Zoccai, G. (eds) Umbrella Reviews. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25655-9_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25655-9_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-25653-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-25655-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics