Skip to main content

Waves and Fields

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 1689 Accesses

Part of the book series: Remote Sensing and Digital Image Processing ((RDIP,volume 23))

Abstract

In a homogeneous lossless material at far distance from the source and in a limited angular range such that \(\pmb{\mathcal{F}}(\vartheta,\varphi )\) in (3.33) is almost constant, the field is regarded as a function of distance r only, of the form

$$\displaystyle{\boldsymbol{E}_{\infty }(\boldsymbol{r}) = C\,\frac{\mathrm{e}^{-\mathrm{j}\kappa r}} {r} \,\pmb{\mathfrak{e}}_{0}{}_{\infty }\;,}$$

where the factor C includes the amplitude information, and the unit vector \(\pmb{\mathfrak{e}}_{0}{}_{\infty }\) accounts for the polarization. In Earth observation, the distance r between the source (Sun, satellite, scattering object) and the region where the field is considered is generally quite large with respect to the dimension of the region itself. For instance, the distance from the Sun is large compared with the dimension of the elementary portion of the Earth’s surface being imaged by a space-based optical sensor. Analogously, the dimension of the antenna receiving the power scattered from the surface is much smaller than the distance between the observed surface and the platform on which the antenna is based. Therefore, within such limited angular ranges, the spherical wave surface Φ = κ r does not differ appreciably from a plane surface, neither the angular pattern changes. Again, this features apply to the solar radiation illuminating the scene instantaneously observed by a spectrometer, to the field locally created on the earth surface by a space-based radar, or to the wave reflected from an area of the surface and collected by the aperture of a satellite sensor. In such limited regions of space, in practice, the radial unit vector \(\boldsymbol{\mathrm{r}}_{0}\) is regarded as constant.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    From now on the subscript \(_{\infty }\) is dropped in the expression of the plane wave.

  2. 2.

    The density of free charge vanishes everywhere in a source-free neutral material.

  3. 3.

    The magnetic field has clearly the same expression as the electric field.

  4. 4.

    Section 6.4 discusses this relevant case.

  5. 5.

    An examples is given in Sect. 6.3.

  6. 6.

    A homogeneous wave is assumed.

  7. 7.

    The attenuation constant α ≥ 0 since \(\tilde{\epsilon }_{\mathrm{j}} \leq 0\) (Sect. 2.1).

  8. 8.

    The expressions hold for frequencies far from resonance and relaxation.

  9. 9.

    Exponential decay of the field is subject to the homogeneity of the propagation medium.

  10. 10.

    Since the material is assumed homogeneous, α is constant.

  11. 11.

    Weak losses clearly include the lossless case.

  12. 12.

    It is understood that the deviations of \(\lambda\) from \(\lambda _{0}\), however small, cannot be neglected in certain applications, as, for instance, radar interferometry (cf. Sect. 12.3.2.1).

  13. 13.

    In a lossless medium, \(\boldsymbol{\alpha }= 0\), so that \(\boldsymbol{k} \equiv \boldsymbol{\beta }\).

  14. 14.

    The variation with distance r is understood to be in the direction \(\boldsymbol{\mathrm{k}}_{0}\) of the propagation vector.

  15. 15.

    In optics, the excess refractive index \(\updelta n = n - 1\) is usually called refractivity.

  16. 16.

    The effects of CO2, which are generally small, are taken into account when enhanced accuracy is required.

  17. 17.

    The correct concept of specific absorption is introduced in Sect. 5.3.2.2.

  18. 18.

    The intensity interference fringes are considered here, while the phase fringes are specifically considered in Sect. 12.3.1.

  19. 19.

    Here the minimum value is \(\vert \boldsymbol{E}_{\mathrm{tot}}(x)\vert = 0\), since the waves are assumed of the same amplitude.

  20. 20.

    SAR interferometry requires a somewhat different approach [6], although the concepts are analogous.

  21. 21.

    The intensity fringes are determined by the phase pattern of the interfering waves and replicate this latter, which, however, can be directly measured and displayed, as detailed in Sect. 12.3.1.

  22. 22.

    \(\mathcal{B}_{\upphi }\) is a function of time when the individual interfering waves exist at different times, as it occurs for repeat-pass interferometry (Sect. 12.3.3.1).

  23. 23.

    The normal distribution assumption is significant and useful, but, given the \(\bmod (\varPhi, 2\uppi )\) phase feature, may possibly lead to inconsistent results.

References

  1. Attenuation by Atmospheric Gases (1990) Technical report CCIR Doc. Rep. 719–3, International Telecommunications Union – ITU

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bean BR, Thayer GD (1959) Models of the atmospheric radio refractive index. Proc IRE 47(5):740–755. doi:10.1109/JRPROC.1959.287242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Born M, Wolf E, Bhatia AB (2002) Principles of optics: electromagnetic theory of propagation, interference and diffraction of light. Cambridge University Press. ISBN:9781139643405

    Google Scholar 

  4. Börner W-M. Basic concepts in radar polarimetry. In: PolSARpro V 3.0 – Lecture Notes (ESA). http://earth.eo.esa.int/polsarpro/Manuals/LN_Basic_Concepts.pdf. Visited on 04 Nov 2014

  5. Collett E (2005) Field guide to polarization. SPIE field guide series. International Society for Optical Engineering. ISBN:9780819458681

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Gatelli F, Monti Guarnieri A, Parizzi F, Pasquali P, Prati C, Rocca F (1994) The wavenumber shift in SAR interferometry. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 32(4):855–865. doi:10.1109/36.298013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Iizuka K (2002) Elements of photonics. In: Free space and special media, vol I. Wiley. ISBN:9780471221074, doi:10.1002/0471221074.ch7

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. ITU Radiocommunication Sector (2012) The radio refractive index: its formula and refractivity data. Technical report Rec. ITU-R pp 453–10. International Telecommunications Union P Series – Radiowave Propagation

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lee JS, Pottier E (2009) Polarimetric radar imaging: from basics to applications. Taylor & Francis. ISBN:9781420054989

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. Le Vine DM, Utku C (2009) Comment on modified Stokes parameters. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 47(8):2707–2713. doi:10.1109/TGRS.2009.2015875

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. McMaster WH (1961) Matrix representation of polarization. Rev Mod Phys 33(1):8–28. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.33.8

    Google Scholar 

  12. Meggers WF, Peters CG (1919) Measurements on the index of refraction of air for wavelengths from 2218 A to 9000 A. Astrophys J 56–71. doi:10.1086/142481

    Google Scholar 

  13. Owens JC (1967) Optical refractive index of air: dependence on pressure, temperature and composition. Appl Opt 6(1):51–59. doi:10.1364/AO.6.000051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Refractive index database. Refractive Index.Info. http://refractiveindex.info/legacy/?group=LIQUIDS&material=Water; http://refractiveindexinfo/legacy/?group=CRYSTALS&material=H20-ice. Visited on 12 Sept 2014

  15. Riley KF, Hobson P (2011) Essential mathematical methods for the physical sciences. Cambridge University Press. ISBN:9781139492942

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rytov SM, Kravtsov YuA, Tatarskii VI (1988) Principles of statistical radiophysics 2: correlation theory of random processes. Springer. ISBN:9780387161860

    Book  Google Scholar 

  17. Salvail JZ, Agnew M, Johnson AS, Bolduc E, Leach J, Boyd RW (2013/04) Full characterization of polarization states of light via direct measurement. Nat Photonics 7(4):316–321. doi:10.1038/nphoton.2013.24

    Google Scholar 

  18. Schott JR (ed) (2009) Fundamentals of polarimetric remote sensing. SPIE. ISBN:9780819478764

    Google Scholar 

  19. Slocum DM, Slingerland EJ, Giles RH, Goyette TM (2013) Atmospheric absorption of terahertz radiation and water vapor continuum effects. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transf. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2013.04.022

  20. Tervo J, Setälä T, Friberg AT (2003) Degree of coherence for electromagnetic fields. Opt Exp 11(10):1137–1143. doi:10.1364/OE.11.001137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ulaby FT, Moore RK, Fung AK (1981) Microwave remote sensing: active and passive. Volume 1, microwave remote sensing fundamentals and radiometry. Addison-Wesley. ISBN:9780890061909

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Solimini, D. (2016). Waves and Fields. In: Understanding Earth Observation. Remote Sensing and Digital Image Processing, vol 23. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25633-7_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics