Skip to main content

Future-Oriented Positioning of Knowledge Intensive Local Networks in Global Value Chains: The Case of Turkey

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Deploying Foresight for Policy and Strategy Makers

Part of the book series: Science, Technology and Innovation Studies ((STAIS))

Abstract

This study focuses on how Turkey’s small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) can participate in global markets. In fact, developing countries provide a means for accelerating the development of enterprises and countries, providing openings that developing country enterprises can exploit to upgrade their capabilities. For such enterprises, or local clusters of enterprises, the task is to insert themselves into the wider networks. This may be regarded as the main achievement for sustaining competitiveness, in similarities with the re-structuring of regional networks in developing countries that often compete by participating in extensive inter-firm networks. As another dimension in our study, we will investigate and argue whether if it is possible to increase and improve the participation of Turkish’s SMEs in the global economy, which is explicitly the baseline hypothesis of this study. The literature on regional networks and global value chain (GVC) will provide us some new insights to show the international linkages of Turkish SMEs, which often lack the capabilities to participate effectively in global markets.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See Gereffi and Korzeniewicz (1994), Gereffi (1999) and other studies on GCC.

  2. 2.

    See Griliches (1979) for the basic theory.

References

  • Agrawal A, Cockburn IM (2002) University research, industrial R&D and the anchor tenant hypothesis. In: NBER Working Paper 9212. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Akgüngor S (2003) Exploring regional specializations in Turkey’s manufacturing industry. In: Paper prepared for presentation at the Regional Studies Association International Conference on Gateway 7: Regional Competitiveness. Pisa, Italy, April 12–15, 2003

    Google Scholar 

  • Altenburg T (2006) Governance patterns in value chains and their development impact. Eur J Dev Res 18:498–521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amin A, Cohendet P (1999) Learning and adaptation in decentralised business networks. Environ Plan D 17:87–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amin A, Cohendet P (2000) Organizational learning and governance through embedded practices. J Manag Gov 4:93–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armatli-Köroğlu B, Beyhan B (2003) The changing role of SMEs in the regional growth process: the case of Denizli. In: Fingleton B, Eraydin A, Paci R (eds) Regional economic growth. SMEs and the Wider Europe. Ashgate, London, pp 229–245

    Google Scholar 

  • Asanuma B (1989) Manufacturer-supplier relationships in Japan and the concept of relation-specific skill. J Japanese Int Econ 3:1–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bathelt H (2003) Geographies of production: growth regimes in spatial perspectives on innovation, institutions and social systems. Prog Human Geogr 27(6):789–804

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boari C, Lipparini A (1999) Networks within industrial districts: organizing knowledge creation and transfer by means of moderate hierarchies. J Manag Govern 3:339–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breschi S, Lissoni F (2001) Knowledge spillovers and local innovation systems: a critical survey. LIUC Papers in Economics 84

    Google Scholar 

  • Buğra A (1994) State and business in modern Turkey: a comparative study. State University of New York Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen MD, Levinthal DA (1990) Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Admin Sci Quart 35:128–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daghfous A (2004) An empirical investigation of the roles of prior knowledge and learning activities in technology transfer. Technovation 24:939–953

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dede OM (1999) Spatial structure of technology based production in Turkey: the case of professional electronics industry in Ankara. PhD dissertation, METU, Ankara

    Google Scholar 

  • Doloreux D, Parto S (2005) Regional innovation systems: current discourse and unresolved issues. Technol Soc 27:133–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eraydin A (1998) The role of regulation mechanisms and public policies at the emergence of the new industrial districts. In: Paper presented at the Symposium on New Nodes of Growth in Turkey: Gaziantep and Denizli, Ankara

    Google Scholar 

  • Eraydin A, Armatlı-Köroğlu B (2005) Innovation, networking and the new industrial clusters: the characteristics of networks and local innovation capabilities in the Turkish industrial clusters. Entrep Reg Dev 17:237–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erdil E, Göksidan HT (2006) Inter-organizational relations in an organized industrial district: Ostim case. Unpublished paper from MSc Thesis

    Google Scholar 

  • Erendil A (1998) Using critical realist approach in geographical research: an attempt to analyze the transforming nature of production and reproduction in Denizli. Unpublished PhD thesis, Department of City and Regional Planning, Middle East Technical University, Ankara

    Google Scholar 

  • Ersoy M (1993) Yeni Liberal Politikalar ve Kentsel Sanayi. METU Faculty of Architecture, Ankara

    Google Scholar 

  • Gereffi G (1994) The organization of buyer-driven global commodity chains: how US retailers shape overseas production networks. In: Gereffi G, Korzeniewicz M (eds) Commodity chains and global capitalism. Praeger, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Gereffi G (1999) International trade and industrial upgrading in the apparel commodity chain. J Int Econ 48:37–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gereffi G, Kaplinsky R (2001) The value of value chains. IDS Bull 32(3)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gereffi G, Korzeniewicz M (eds) (1994) Commodity chains and global capitalism. Praeger, Westport

    Google Scholar 

  • Gertler MS (2003) Tacit knowledge and the economic geography of context, or the undefinable tacitness of being (there). J Econ Geogr 3:75–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giuliani E (2005) When the micro shapes the meso: learning and innovation in wine clusters. PhD Thesis. SPRU, University of Sussex, Brighton

    Google Scholar 

  • Griliches Z (1979) Issues in assessing the contribution of R&D to productivity and growth. J Econ 10:92–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson J, Dicken P, Hess M, Coe N, Yeung HYC (2002) Global production networks and the analysis of economic development. Rev Int Politic Econ 9(3):436–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede G (1984) Culture’s consequences: international differences in work-related attitudes. Sage, Beverly Hills

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphrey J, Schmitz H (2002a) How does insertion in global value chains affect upgrading industrial clusters? Region Stud 36:1017–1027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Humphrey J, Schmitz H (2002b) Developing country firms in the world economy: governance and upgrading in global value chains. INEF Report No. 61, University of Duisburg, Duisburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphrey J, Schmitz H (2004) Governance in global value chains. Institudo Nacional de Technologia Industrial (INTI), Spain

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplinsky R (2000) Globalisation and unequalisation: what can be learned from value chain analysis? J Dev Stud 37:117–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim L (1998) Crisis constructon and organizational learning: capability builing in catching up at Hyundai motor. Org Sci 9:506–521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krugman P (1991) Geography and trade. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuruüzüm O (1998) Bilimsel Bilginin Ticarileştirilmesinde Yeni Ufuklar: Teknoloji Geliştirme Bölgeleri. Akdeniz Üniversitesi Yayınları

    Google Scholar 

  • Lall S (2001) Competitiveness indices and developing countries: an economic evaluation of the global competitiveness report. World Dev 29(9):1501–1525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lazerson M, Lorenzoni G (1999) The firms that feed industrial districts: a return to the Italian source. Ind Corporate Change 82(2):235–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malecki E, Oinas P (eds) (2000) Making connections: technological learning and regional economic change. Ashgate, Aldershot

    Google Scholar 

  • Malerba F (2005) Sectoral systems: how and why innovation differs across sectors. In: Fagerberg J, Mowery D, Nelson R (eds) The Oxford handbook of innovation. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison A, Pietrobelli C, Rabellotti R (2008) Global value chains and technological capabilities: a framework to study learning and innovation in developing countries. Oxford Dev Stud 36(1):39–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakato T (2004) Bridging roles of SMEs in a large scale industrial district: a structural approach. University of Michigan Flint School of Management Working Paper Series

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson R, Winter S (1982) An evolutionary theory of economic change. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Öz Ö (1999) The competitive advantage of nations: the case of Turkey. Ashgate Publishing, Farnham

    Google Scholar 

  • Öz Ö (2004) Clusters and competitive advantage: the Turkish experience. Palgrave Mac-Millian, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Özcan GB (1995) Small firms and local economic development: entrepreneurship in Turkey. Avebury, Aledershot

    Google Scholar 

  • Pasa S, Kabasakal H, Bodur M (2001) Society, organizations, and leadership in Turkey. Appl Psychol Int Rev 50(4):59–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Peres W, Stumpo G (2000) Small and medium-sized manufacturing enterprises in Latin America and the Caribbean under the new economic model. World Dev 28(9):1643–1655

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pietrobelli C (1998) Industry, competitiveness and technological capabilities in Chile, A new tiger from Latin America? MacMillan and St. Martin’s, London and New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pietrobelli C, Rabellotti R (2007) Upgrading to compete. Global value chains, clusters and SMEs in Latin America. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter M (1990) The competitive advantage of nations. Macmillan, London and Basingstoke

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Reyhan N (1990) The spatial implications of restructuring of production organization of Bursa textile industry. MSc dissertation, METU, Ankara

    Google Scholar 

  • Ronen S (1986) Comparative and multinational management. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Saliola F, Zanfei A (2009) Multinational firms, global value chains and the organization of knowledge transfer. Res Pol 38:369–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saraçoğlu Y (1993) Local production networks: an opportunity for development. MSc dissertation, METU, Ankara

    Google Scholar 

  • Saxenian A (1991) The origins and dynamics of product networks in Silicon Valley. Res Pol 20:423–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saxenian A (1994) Regional advantage: culture and competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz SH (1994) Beyond individualism/collectivism: new cultural dimensions of values. In: Kim U et al (eds) Individualism and collectivism: theory, methods, and applications. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp 85–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmie JM (2002) Trading places: competitive cities in the global economy. Eur Plan Stud 10(2):201–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taymaz E (1997) The dynamics of firms in a micro-to-macro model with training, learning, and innovation. J Evolut Econ 7:435–457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tekeli İ (1994) Ankara’da tarih icinde sanayinin gelişimi ve mekansal farklılaşma. Yapi Kredi Yayinlari, Ankara, pp 171–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulusoy G (2003) An assessment of supply chain and innovation management practices in the manufacturing industries in Turkey. Int J Prod Econ 86:251–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vale M, Caldeira J (2008) Fashion and the governance of knowledge in a traditional industry: the case of the footwear sectoral innovation system in the northern region of Portugal. Econ Innov New Technol 17(1–2):61–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Economic Forum (2011) The global competitiveness report 2011–2012. Geneva

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Erkan Erdil .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Erdil, E., Göksidan, H.T. (2016). Future-Oriented Positioning of Knowledge Intensive Local Networks in Global Value Chains: The Case of Turkey. In: Gokhberg, L., Meissner, D., Sokolov, A. (eds) Deploying Foresight for Policy and Strategy Makers. Science, Technology and Innovation Studies. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25628-3_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics