Skip to main content

Impact Analysis of Foresight for STI Policy Formulation: Cases of Romania, Vietnam and Kazakhstan

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Deploying Foresight for Policy and Strategy Makers

Part of the book series: Science, Technology and Innovation Studies ((STAIS))

  • 887 Accesses

Abstract

The chapter focuses on the application of foresight for formulation and implementation of science, technology and innovation policy and strategies, named STI foresight. In this context, it proposes a modelling concept and framework for individual and comparative impact analysis of STI foresight exercises. After an introduction to set the context and methods for project evaluation, the paper addresses the use of future-looking methods for identifying potential science and technology developments and research activities that could be applicable in the longer term to target needs of developing countries and emerging economies. Further, a the paper examines the most appropriate methods for evaluating foresight exercises, especially those dedicated to science, technology and innovation policy and strategies. Finally, case studies in Romania, Vietnam and Kazakhstan are evaluated according to the proposed modelling. Eventually the proposed modelling shall constitute a benchmarking framework for designing and evaluating STI foresight exercises.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For more details see Popper et al. (2010).

References

  • Aguirre-Bastos C, Weber M (2012) Foresight and STI strategy development in an emerging economy: the case of Vietnam. EFP Brief No. 246

    Google Scholar 

  • Destatte P (2007) Evaluation of foresight: how to take long term impacts into consideration? FOR-LEARN mutual learning workshop evaluation of foresight. Brussels, IPTS-DG RTD, 19 September

    Google Scholar 

  • Georghiou L (2003) Evaluating foresight and lessons for its future impact. The second international conference on technology foresight, Tokyo, 27–28 February

    Google Scholar 

  • Gokhberg L (ed) (2016) Russia 2030: science and technology foresight. Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation, National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow

    Google Scholar 

  • Grosu D, Curaj A (2007) Technology foresight in a power-oriented strategy for change. Conclusions after the Romanian technology foresight exercise. Futura 2:52–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Havas A, Schartinger D, Weber M (2010) The impact of foresight on innovation policy-making: recent experiences and future perspectives. Res Eval 19(2):91–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston R (2012) Developing the capacity to assess the impact of foresight. Foresight 14(1):56–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kang MH, Lee LC, Li SS (2009) Developing the evaluation framework of technology foresight program: lesson learned from European countries. Atlanta conference on science and innovation policy. http://hdl.handle.net/1853/32392. Accessed 7 Aug 2015

  • Martin B (2006) Strategic decision-making in policy formulation and the role of foresight. UNIDO training programme on technology foresight, module 3: technology foresight for decision-makers. Budapest, Hungary, 9 November

    Google Scholar 

  • Meissner D (2012) Results and impact of national foresight-studies. Futures 44(10):905–913

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Popper R, Georghiou L, Keenan M, Miles I (2010) Evaluating foresight: fully-fledged evaluation of the Colombian technology foresight programme (CTFP). Universidad del Valle, Santiago de Cali

    Google Scholar 

  • Seidl da Fonseca R, Saritas O (2005) Instruments for strategy and policy: modelling the structure of the policy-making on science and technology. 14th International conference on management of technology, Vienna, Austria, 22–25 May

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith J (2012) Measuring foresight impact. EFP Brief No. 249

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokolova A, Makarova E (2013) Integrated framework for evaluation of national foresight studies. In: Meissner D, Gokhberg L, Sokolov A (eds) Science, technology and innovation policy for the future—potentials and limits of foresight studies. Heidelberg, pp 11–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson RM (2001) Logical framework training guide. Team Technologies Inc., Springfield, VA

    Google Scholar 

  • UNIDO (2010a) Inception report. Doc. STI-WP0-MOD2-001-v7-010610

    Google Scholar 

  • UNIDO (2010b) The science, technology and innovation system and policy analysis. Doc. STI-wp1-MOD3-001-V.4-020610

    Google Scholar 

  • UNIDO (2010c) Trend analysis and scenario development of the Vietnamese STI system. Doc. STI-WP1-MOD5-012-V.1

    Google Scholar 

  • UNIDO (2010d) Technology Foresight Manual, UNIDO, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ricardo Seidl da Fonseca .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

da Fonseca, R.S. (2016). Impact Analysis of Foresight for STI Policy Formulation: Cases of Romania, Vietnam and Kazakhstan. In: Gokhberg, L., Meissner, D., Sokolov, A. (eds) Deploying Foresight for Policy and Strategy Makers. Science, Technology and Innovation Studies. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25628-3_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics