Skip to main content

Analysis of Geographical Proper Names in Terms of the Indexicality Account of Proper Names

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Modeling and Using Context (CONTEXT 2015)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 9405))

Abstract

This paper focuses on geographical names, which are names of geographical regions. Geographical and personal names will be distinguished with reference to evidence from linguistics as well as cognitive science. Since the entire debate is on the relationship between geographical names and their bearers, the reference of geographical names in the context of use will be examined and two possible views on geographical name reference will be proposed. As a test case, the cases of geographical developments will be examined. The basic idea involves extending the indexicality account with generic names. If a geographical name is used in the standard context, it refers to specific geographical territory, whose development is tracked by discursive participants through (a) the causal history of communications of the name in question and (b) its current referred territory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    I do not address the issue of temporal names, including whether such names exist.

  2. 2.

    The notion of generic names will be explained in Sect. 4.1.

  3. 3.

    One can see some disanalogies between personal pronouns and names here, because the lexical meanings of pronouns work as intensional characterization of the class in question. Contrastingly, as far as personal names are concerned, there is no properties shared among referents of a name except for being named such and such.

  4. 4.

    The strong/weak distinction is “a rather arbitrary matter” [11, fn. 77 (p. 517)] from the cross-lingual perspectives. For example, Russian personal names are strong as well as geographical names.

  5. 5.

    Naïve Millians, such as Salmon [16], treated proper names as syntactically simple. Thus, they appear to claim that English weak proper names, like “the Pacific Ocean,” are not proper names but definite descriptions. However, this distinction is not justified both linguistically and philosophically.

  6. 6.

    Furthermore, it is highly doubtful whether the following sentence is acceptable:

    1. (7)

      My great grandmother met Dickens, whome I read.

  7. 7.

    Of course, there are metonymical usages of geographical names. For example, observe the following article title:

    1. (8)

      Seoul Surprises with Interest Rate Cut. [24]

    “Seoul” used here is neither the geographical territory nor the city hall. For example, it is doubtful whether the following is acceptable:

    1. (9)

      \(^?\)The city surprises with interest rate cut.

    Rather, “Seoul” is used to metonymically refer to the Bank of Korea that has its headquarter in Seoul.

  8. 8.

    I use the term “default referent” as a neutral term between the indexicality and homonymy accounts.

  9. 9.

    From “Demographia”: http://www.demographia.com/dm-par90.htm (seen on Jan. 26, 2014).

  10. 10.

    However, it is not the aim of this paper to discuss the metaphysics of social institutions (see, e.g., [9] for some overview).

  11. 11.

    This notion of social entity, whatever it is, must be clearly separated from that of stereotype. For example, a district in Paris, in which there are only Starbuck’s instead of cafes, is not stereotypical to Paris such that we would like to claim: “This is not Paris.”

    Discussing stereotypes is not relevant for the issue because one can construct equivalent examples for all sorts of expressions, including common nouns or verbs.

  12. 12.

    From the same reason, the Weaker view of the indexicality account (which Stojanovic [20] examined) does not come into consideration here.

  13. 13.

    The earlier versions of this paper were presented at Nihon University (July, 2014), Universität Stuttgart (December, 2014), and University of Tokyo (April, 2015). I am grateful for the comments and questions raised by the participants. Luca Gasparri, Masaya Mine, and Isidora Stojanovic provided some materials in preparing this paper. I learned much from discussions with Masahide Asano, Naoya Fujikawa, Luca Gasparri, Yoichi Matsusaka, Yutaka Morinaga, Christoph Michel, Francois Recanati, Tsubasa Tsushima, Masahide Yotsu (in alphabetical order) and three anonymous reviewers. Despite all the fruitful discussions, the remaining mistakes are of course all mine. This research is funded by JSPS-Kakenhi (26-7077).

References

  1. Almog, J.: Semantical anthropology. Midwest Stud. Philos. 9(1), 478–489 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Fujikawa, N.: Namaeni nanno imiga aru noka: Koyumeino tetsugaku [What’s in a Name?: Philosophy of Proper Names]. Keiso Shobo, Tokyo (2014). (In Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hawley, K.: Temporal parts. In: Zalta, E.N. (ed.) Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Winter 2010 edn. (2010). http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2010/entries/temporal-parts/

  4. Kaplan, D.: Words. Proc. Aristotelian Soc. (Supplementary Volumes) 64, 93–119 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Korta, K., Perry, J.: Critical Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2011)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Kripke, S.A.: Naming and Neccesity. Basil Blackwell, Oxford (1980). Originally deliverd as a series of lectures at Princeton University in 1970

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lyons, F., Hanley, J.R., Kay, J.: Anomia for common names and geographical names with preserved retrieval of names of people: a semantic memory disorder. Cortex J. Devoted Study Nerv. Syst. Behav. 38(1), 23–35 (2002). http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11999331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Marconi, D.: Dictionaries and proper names. Hist. Philos. Q. 7(1), 77–92 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Miller, S.: Social institutions. In: Zalta, E.N. (ed.) Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Winter 2014 edn. (2014). http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2014/entries/social-institutions/

  10. Olson, E.T.: Personal identity. In: Zalta, E.N. (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Winter 2010 edn. (2010). http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2010/entries/identity-personal/

  11. Payne, J., Huddleston, R.: Nouns and noun phrases (Chap. 5). In: Huddleston, R., Pullum, G.K. (eds.) The Cambridge Grammar of the English language, pp. 323–523. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Pustejovsky, J.: The Generative Lexicon. MIT Press, Cambridge (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Pustejovsky, J.: A survey of dot objects. Artif. Intell. 2005(2), 1–9 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rami, D.: The use-conditional indexical conception of proper names. Philos. Stud. 168(1), 119–150 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Recanati, F.: Direct Reference: From Language to Thought, Paperback edn. Blackwell, Oxford (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Salmon, N.: A Millian Heir rejects the wages of sinn (Chap. 9). In: Anderson, C.A., Owens, J. (eds.) Propositional Attitudes: The Role of Content in Logic, Language, and Mind. CSLI Lecture Notesm, vol. 20, pp. 215–247. Center for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Schiffer, S.: Two issues of vagueness. Monist 81(2), 193–215 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Semenza, C.: The neuropsychology of proper names. Mind Lang. 24(4), 347–369 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sider, T.: Four-Dimensionalism. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Stojanovic, I.: Referring with proper names: towards a pragmatic account (Chap. 6). In: Baptista, L., Rast, E.H. (eds.) Meaning and Context, pp. 139–160. Peter Lang, Bern (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Williamson, T.: Vagueness. Routledge, London (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Yasuda, K., Ono, Y.: Comprehension of famous personal and geographical names in global aphasic subjects. Brain Lang. 61(61), 274–287 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wissenschaftlicher Rat der Dudenredaktion (ed.): Anordnung und Behandlung der Stichwörter. In: DUDEN - Das große Wörterbuch der deutschen Sprache. Die CD-ROM edition. Duden Verlag, Mannheim (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Zhong, I.: Seoul surprises with interest rate cut. In: Barron’s Take (2015). http://online.barrons.com/articles/SB52018153252431963983004580513272127494624. Accessed 16 Mar 2015

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tomoo Ueda .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ueda, T. (2015). Analysis of Geographical Proper Names in Terms of the Indexicality Account of Proper Names. In: Christiansen, H., Stojanovic, I., Papadopoulos, G. (eds) Modeling and Using Context. CONTEXT 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9405. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25591-0_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25591-0_23

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-25590-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-25591-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics