Skip to main content

The Whistleblowing Dilemma in Malta Continues: A Personal View and Analysis

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Whistleblowing - A Comparative Study

Part of the book series: Ius Comparatum - Global Studies in Comparative Law ((GSCL,volume 16))

  • 1301 Accesses

Abstract

For many years, Malta did not have a law which specifically dealt with whistleblowing. No law acknowledged or defended whistleblowers. As in other countries, whistleblowers in Malta have generally faced great difficulties and suffered retaliation for their deeds. A few years ago, whistleblowing was acknowledged in a few provisions in employment law but these were rather incomplete and were not supported by any proper structure. After a number of false starts, the Maltese Parliament finally passed a ‘Protection of Whistleblowers Act’ in 2013. This was the first ever comprehensive law on the subject; but is it good enough and do whistleblowers feel safe now? The writer argues that the law does not protect all disclosures and various onerous conditions have been imposed in the law. A prospective whistleblower should seriously consider his position before reporting wrong-doing or corruption in his work place. This chapter concludes that in Malta, despite the recent 2013 Act, whistleblowing remains a very risky and thankless decision.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    He wrote a book on his misadventures, see S Adams, Roche versus Adams (London, Jonathan Cape, 1984).

  2. 2.

    The financial services industry in Malta was then still taking off.

  3. 3.

    Malta Union Of Bank Employees Annual Conference held on the 22 July 1998.

  4. 4.

    G Cini, ‘White collar crime conference’ (23 July 1998) The Times (Malta), p. 17.

  5. 5.

    D Fabri, ‘Political corruption, prescription and whistleblowing’ (30 August 1998) The Sunday Times (Malta), p. 14.

  6. 6.

    ibid.

  7. 7.

    Act No. VIII of 2013, July 2013, Chapter 527 on the Laws of Malta. It was brought into force on 15th September 2013 and is available online at www.justiceservices.gov.mt/LOM.aspx?pageid=24.

  8. 8.

    Bill No. 58 of 2010.

  9. 9.

    J Ameen, ‘Whistleblower Bill by end of the year: two electoral promises’ (24 August 2009) The Times; N Grima, ‘Whistleblower Bill presented’ (1 October 2010) The Malta Independent (front page article); K Sansone, ‘Draft law strives to protect whistleblowers’ (1 October 2010) The Times (Malta) (front page article). See also brief review by Björn Rohde-Liebenau (Transparency International, November 2013, pp 63–65) section on Malta in Whistleblowing in Europe: Legal protections for whistleblowers in the EU. This refers to an earlier report by the same writer (Transparency International, November 2012) Providing an Alternative to Silence: Towards Greater Protection and Support for Whistleblowers in the EU. Country Report: Malta. These country reports preceded the enactment of the 2013 legislation, now in force.

  10. 10.

    Art. 2 (1) definition of ‘employee’.

  11. 11.

    Act No. XXV of 1995, Chapter 386 of the Laws of Malta.

  12. 12.

    Chapter 452 of the Laws of Malta.

  13. 13.

    The Agencies authorized to receive prescribed external disclosures are listed in the First Schedule to the Act.

  14. 14.

    Art. 2.

  15. 15.

    ibid.

  16. 16.

    The term remains undefined.

  17. 17.

    This concession is not an automatic one but depends entirely on the discretion of the adjudicator and of the Attorney General as explained in art. 5 (4).

  18. 18.

    The rule that legal protection is only extended where an internal disclosure, or an attempted disclosure, has been made beforehand, is repeated in Art. 15.

  19. 19.

    It seems that a recent new Bill on whistleblowing in Switzerland raises a similar impediment and has been criticized accordingly: ‘White Collar Crime: Proposed legislation on whistleblowing – de facto ban on reporting to the public?’ (1 December 2014) International Law Office Newsletter.

  20. 20.

    Chapter 248 of the Laws of Malta.

  21. 21.

    Art. 46: ‘46. No court shall require any person mentioned in Art. 23 to disclose, nor shall such person be guilty of contempt of court for refusing to disclose, the source of information contained in a newspaper or broadcast for which he is responsible unless it is established to the satisfaction of the court that such disclosure is necessary in the interests of national security, territorial integrity or public safety, or for the prevention of disorder or crime or for the protection of the interests of justice…’.

  22. 22.

    This concern was identified in K Sansone,’ Whistleblowers who report to the media unprotected’ (19 October 2010) The Times (online version) and later K Aquilina, ‘A whistle-less whistleblower’ (9 April 2014) Malta Today (online version).

  23. 23.

    See the writer’s ‘The Price of Whistle-blowing: the flawed ECJ Decision in Stanley Adams vs Commission of the European Communities (1985)’, Id-Dritt, Vol. XXII, 2012. More recent developments: ‘FIFA whistleblower Pahedra Al-Majid fears for her safety’ (20 November 2014) BBC Sport (online version) and ‘Fifa whistleblowers submit formal complaint over blowing their cover’ (17 November 2014) The Guardian (online version).

  24. 24.

    Art. 11 (2).

  25. 25.

    M Goldstein, ‘Whistle-Blower on Countrywide Mortgage Misdeeds to get $57 Million’ (17 December 2014) The New York Times.

  26. 26.

    K Micallef, ‘Just 48 whistleblower reports sent to helpline’ (12 October 2014) The Times.

  27. 27.

    See also ‘48 whistleblowing reports lodged with Justice Ministry’ (13 October 2014) Malta Today.

  28. 28.

    ibid.

  29. 29.

    It is not stated to whom this must be shown.

  30. 30.

    ‘Personal gain’ is not defined.

  31. 31.

    Or even the lack of good faith.

  32. 32.

    Especially in articles 5 and 9.

  33. 33.

    The writer has written more extensively on these aspects in ‘Whistleblowing in Malta: a note on recent developments, proposals and missed opportunities’ (2002) The Company Lawyer Vol. 23 No. 1, p. 30.

  34. 34.

    J Borg, ‘Whistleblowers Act not arbitrary go-ahead to leak information - Justice Minister’ (22 December 2014) The Malta Independent (online version).

Bibliography

  • Ameen J (24 Aug 2009) Whistleblower Bill by end of the year: two electoral promises, The Times

    Google Scholar 

  • Aquilina K (9 April 2014) A whistle-less whistleblower, Malta Today (online version)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bencini C (15 May 2014) Offering real protection to the whistleblower, Malta Today (online version) // (2007) Whistle Blowing in the Financial Services Sector: the position under Maltese Law, Dissertation, Masters in Financial Services, University of Malta

    Google Scholar 

  • Borg J (22 Dec 2014) Whistleblowers Act not arbitrary go-ahead to leak information – Justice Minister, The Malta Independent (online version)

    Google Scholar 

  • Conway R (20 Nov 2014) FIFA whistleblower Pahedra Al-Majid fears for her safety, BBC Sport

    Google Scholar 

  • Fabri D (30 Aug 1998) Political corruption, prescription and whistleblowing, The Sunday Times (Malta), p 14//Whistleblowing in Malta: a note on recent developments, proposals and missed opportunities, The Company Lawyer, Vol. 23 No 1, p30, 2002//No more heroes any more? The whistle–blowing dilemma: recent developments and a fresh look at some conceptual and legal issues, Id-Dritt, Vol. XX, September 2009 (and materials mentioned therein)//The Price of Whistle-blowing: the flawed ECJ Decision in Stanley Adams vs Commission of the European Communities (1985), Id-Dritt, Vol. XXII, 2012 (and materials mentioned therein)

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein M (17 Dec 2014) Whistle-Blower on Countrywide Mortgage Misdeeds to get $57 Million, The New York Times

    Google Scholar 

  • Grima N (1 Oct 2010) Whistleblower Bill presented, The Malta Independent (front page article)

    Google Scholar 

  • International Law Office Newsletter (1 Dec 2014) White Collar Crime: Proposed legislation on whistleblowing – de facto ban on reporting to the public?

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohde-Liebenau B (Transparency International, November 2013, section on Malta, pp 63–65) Whistleblowing in Europe: Legal protections for whistleblowers in the EU/(Transparency International, November 2012) Providing an Alternative to Silence: Towards Greater Protection and Support for Whistleblowers in the EU. Country Report: Malta

    Google Scholar 

  • Sansone K (1 Oct 2010) Draft law strives to protect whistleblowers, The Times (Malta) (front page article)//(19 Oct 2010) Whistleblowers who report to the media unprotected, The Times (online version)

    Google Scholar 

  • Vassallo H (13 Aug 2011) Does Malta need a Whistleblower Act?, Malta Today, p. 11

    Google Scholar 

  • Vassallo R (16 March 2008) Whistleblowin’ in the wind… Malta Today on Sunday, p. 15

    Google Scholar 

  • Vella M, Sunday (20 Nov 2011) Whistleblowers penalised for reporting abuse at Mount Carmel, Malta Today on Sunday (online version)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Fabri .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fabri, D. (2016). The Whistleblowing Dilemma in Malta Continues: A Personal View and Analysis. In: Thüsing, G., Forst, G. (eds) Whistleblowing - A Comparative Study. Ius Comparatum - Global Studies in Comparative Law, vol 16. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25577-4_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25577-4_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-25575-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-25577-4

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics