Skip to main content

Portugal: The Protection of the Whistleblower from the Perspective of a Country Without Specific Legislation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Whistleblowing - A Comparative Study

Part of the book series: Ius Comparatum - Global Studies in Comparative Law ((GSCL,volume 16))

  • 1281 Accesses

Abstract

Law may to some extent protect the whistleblower without a specific treatment of whistleblowing – even if that sounds as a paradox – and that is frequently the case in countries where the disciplinary dismissal requires a faulty breach of the employment contract by the employee, particularly if the employee is entitled to reinstatement if the dismissal is unlawful.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This scarcity of judicial cases is by no means restricted to Portugal. The same seems to be true, for instance, in Italy. See MARIA TERESA CARINCI, Whistleblowing in Italy: rights and protections for the employers, WPCSDLE “Massimo D’Antona”. INT, n.° 106/2014 (http://csdle.lex.unict.it), p. 2. This writer explains the rarity of judicial cases concerning whistleblowing stating that the Italian citizen in average is not that much concerned with the common good.

  2. 2.

    Acórdão Tribunal da Relação de Coimbra, 27/09/2012, 471/11.0T4 AGD.C1 (LUIS MIGUEL FERREIRA DE AZEVEDEO MENDES), available (in Portuguese) in www.dgsi.pt.

  3. 3.

    Acórdão Tribunal da Relação do Porto, 08/10/2012 (PAULA LEAL DE CARVALHO) available (in Portuguese) in www.dgsi.pt.

  4. 4.

    Neither, perhaps, the main reason. See TERRY MOREHEAD DWORKIN, SOX and Whistleblowing, Michigan Law Review 2007, vol. 105, pp. 1757 et seq, pp. 1763–1764.

  5. 5.

    GÜNTHER WIESE, Zur innerbetrieblichen und ausserbetrieblichen Kommunikation von Arbeitnehmern, Festschrift für Hansjörg Otto zum 70. Geburtstag, De Gruyter Recht, Berlin, 2008, pp. 621et seq, p. 634: “keine Veranlassung besteht, diesen Begriff zu übernehmen”.

  6. 6.

    See, for instance, LUCIEN FLAMENT/PHILIPPE THOMAS, Le Whistleblowing: à propos de la licéité des systèmes d’alerte éthique, JCP, La Semaine Juridique, Édition Sociale 2005, n,° 17, 1227, pp. 15 et seq, p. 17 and PATRICE ADAM, Le retour des sycophantes? (à propos du whistleblowing), Le Droit Ouvrier 2006, pp. 281 et seq.

  7. 7.

    The legal discussion itself is at times somewhat emotive or even irrational, a danger pointed out by a number of writers. See ANDREI KIRÁLY, Whistleblower in Deutschland und Grossbritannien, RdA 2012, pp. 236 et seq, at p. 236 and RAMON RAGUÉS I VALLÈS, Whistleblowing, Una aproximación desde el Derecho Penal, Marcial Pons, Madrid, 2013, p. 23.

  8. 8.

    The same view was defended in Italy by ROBERTO LATTANZI, Prime Riflessioni sul c. d. Whistleblowing. Un Modello da Replicare “ad Occhi Chiusi”?, RIDL 2010, I, pp. 335, p. 344.

  9. 9.

    As a matter of fact such protection should go beyond labour law, protecting the whistleblower, for instance, against civil liability, as correctly pointed out by, SEVERIN GLASER/PETER KOMENDA, Whistleblowing in Österreich – Gefahren, Probleme, und Lösungsmöglichkeiten, JRP (Journal fur Rechtspolitik), 2012, pp. 207 et seq, p. 221.

  10. 10.

    As correctly pointed out by GREGOR THÜSING/GERRIT FORST, Whistleblowing around the World, A Comparative Analysis of Whistleblowing in 25 Countries, p. 13.

  11. 11.

    MIKE SCHULZ, Compliance – Internes Whistleblowing, Betriebs-Berater 2011, pp. 629 et seq, p. 630.

  12. 12.

    The same seems to be true in Italy: see FABRIZIA SANTINI, Il Diritto di Critica del Lavoratore alla Luce della Più Recente Ricostruzione dell’Obbligo di Fedeltà, RIDL 2009, parte II, pp. 921 et seq, p. 924.

  13. 13.

    Some German writers, albeit possibly a minority, however, do not consider necessary to introduce specific legislation on whistleblowing in labour law. Compare MICHAEL SIMONET, Notwendigkeit eines Gesetzes zum Schutz von Whistleblowern?, RdA 2013, pp. 236 et seq (against such a need) and GERRIT FORST, Whistleblowing im internationalen Vergleich – Was kann Deutschland von seinen Nachbarn lernen?, EuZA 2013, pp. 37 et seq (in favour of such a legislation).

  14. 14.

    The protection of the whistleblower is seen as a result of the interdiction, as a rule, of private justice, by PETER GÄNSSLE, Der Whistleblower im Spannungsfeld zwischen Korruptionsbekämpfung und arbeitsrechtlichen Pflichten, Kritische Justiz 2007, pp. 265 et seq, p, 270.

  15. 15.

    See also DAVID LEWIS, Whistleblowing at Work: on what Principles should Legislation be based?, Industrial Law Journal 2001, pp. 169 et seq.

  16. 16.

    GERRIT FORST, Strafanzeige gegen den ArbeitgeberGrund zur Kündigung des Arbeitsvertrags?, NJW 2011, pp. 3477, pp. 3480–3481, considers that the motives of the whistleblower ought to be irrelevant, at least whenever the whistleblowing refers to crimes. He reiterates this opinion in Whistleblowing im internationalen Vergleich – Was kann Deutschland von seinen Nachbarn lernen?, EuZA 2013, pp. 37, p. 71. Similar remarks were made by PETER BOWAL, Malice and Whistleblowing, E-Journal of International and Comparative Labour Studies, 2013, vol. 2, n.° 3, pp. 94 et seq, p. 96.

  17. 17.

    JAMES GOBERT / MAURICE PUNCH, Whistleblowers, the Public Interest and the Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998, The Modern Law Review 2000, vol. 63, pp. 25 et seq, p. 43.

  18. 18.

    REYES CALDERÓN-CUADRADO/ JOSÉ LUIS ÁLVAREZ-ARCE/ISABEL RODRÍGUEZ-TEJEDO/SRELLA SALVATIERRA, “Ethics Hotlines” in Transnational Companies: A Comparative Study, Journal of Business Ethics 2009, vol. 88, pp. 199 et seq, draw a distinction between a “compliance approach” and a “value-based approach”. The later preferred by many North-American multinational enterprises attempts to strengthen the internal cohesion of the enterprise around a set of values.

  19. 19.

    MARIE-THESES TINNEFELD/ JUDITH RAUHOFER, Whistleblower: Verantwortungsbewusste Mitarbeiter oder Denunzianten?, DuD (Datenschutz und Datensicherheit) 2008, pp. 717 et seq, p. 717.

  20. 20.

    On this debate see SUSANNE MAYER, Anzeigepflicht des Arbeitnehmers, ZAS 2010, pp. 186–187 and JOHANNA NADERHIRN, Whistleblowing im Arbeitsrecht – Ausgewählte Aspekte, DRdA 2014, n.° 1, pp. 14 et seq, pp. 22–25.

Bibliography

  • Adam P (2006) Le retour des sycophantes? (à propos du whistleblowing), Le Droit Ouvrier, pp. 281 et seq

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowal P (2013) Malice and Whistleblowing, E-Journal of International and Comparative Labour Studies, vol. 2, n.° 3, pp. 94 et seq

    Google Scholar 

  • Calderón-Cuadrado R, Álvarez-Arce JL, Rodríguez-Tejedo I, Salvatierra S (2009) “Ethics Hotlines” in Transnational Companies: A Comparative Study, Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 88, pp. 199 et seq

    Google Scholar 

  • Carinci MT (2014) Whistleblowing in Italy: rights and protections for the employers, WPCSDLE “Massimo D’Antona”. INT, n.° 106, http://csdle.lex.unict.it, Accessed April 2015

  • Dworkin TM (2007) SOX and Whistleblowing, Michigan Law Review 2007, vol. 105, pp. 1757 et seq

    Google Scholar 

  • Forst G (2011) Strafanzeige gegen den Arbeitgeber – Grund zur Kündigung des Arbeitsvertrags? Neue Juristische Wochenschrift (NJW) 64: 3477–3482

    Google Scholar 

  • Forst G (2013) Whistleblowing im internationalen Vergleich – Was kann Deutschland von seinen Nachbarn lernen? Europäische Zeitschrift für Arbeitsrecht (EuZA) 6: 37–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser S, Komenda P (2012) Whistleblowing in Österreich – Gefahren, Probleme, und Lösungsmöglichkeiten, Journal für Rechtspolitik 2012, pp. 207 et seq

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gobert J, Punch M (1998) Whistleblowers, the Public Interest and the Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998, The Modern Law Review 2000, vol. 63, pp. 25 et seq

    Google Scholar 

  • Gänßle P (2007) Der Whistleblower im Spannungsfeld zwischen Korruptionsbekämpfung und arbeitsrechtlichen Pflichten. Kritische Justiz 40: 265–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Király A (2012) Whistleblower in Deutschland und Grossbritannien, Recht der Arbeit 2012, pp. 236 et seq

    Google Scholar 

  • Lattanzi R (2010) Prime Riflessioni sul c. d. Whistleblowing. Un Modello da Replicare “ad Occhi Chiusi”?, Rivista Italiana di Diritto del Lavoro 2010, I, pp. 335 et seq

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis D (2001) Whistleblowing at Work: on what Principles should Legislation be based?, Industrial Law Journal 2001, pp. 169 et seq

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer S (2010) Anzeigepflicht des Arbeitnehmers, Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Sozialrecht 2010, pp. 186 et seq

    Google Scholar 

  • Moberly RE (2007) Unfulfilled Expectations: An Empirical Analysis of Why Sarbanes-Oxley Whistleblowers Rarely Win. 49 William & Mary Law Review 49: 65–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Punch M – See Gobert J

    Google Scholar 

  • Ragués i Vallés R (2013) Whistleblowing, Una aproximación desde el Derecho Penal, Marcial Pons, Madrid

    Google Scholar 

  • Santini F (2009) Il Diritto di Critica del Lavoratore alla Luce della Più Recente Ricostruzione dell’Obbligo di Fedeltà, Rivista Italiana di Diritto del Lavoro, parte II, pp. 921 et seq

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulz M (2011) Compliance – Internes Whistleblowing, Betriebs-Berater 2011, pp. 629 et seq

    Google Scholar 

  • Simonet M (2013) Notwendigkeit eines Gesetzes zum Schutz von Whistleblowern?, Recht der Arbeit 2013, pp. 236 et seq

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinnefeld MT, Rauhofer J (2008) Whistleblower: Verantwortungsbewusste Mitarbeiter oder Denunzianten?, Datenschutz und Datensicherheit 2008, pp. 717 et seq

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiese G (2008) Zur innerbetrieblichen und ausserbetrieblichen Kommunikation von Arbeitnehmern, Festschrift für Hansjörg Otto zum 70. Geburtstag, De Gruyter Recht, Berlin,, pp. 621et seq

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Júlio Gomes .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gomes, J. (2016). Portugal: The Protection of the Whistleblower from the Perspective of a Country Without Specific Legislation. In: Thüsing, G., Forst, G. (eds) Whistleblowing - A Comparative Study. Ius Comparatum - Global Studies in Comparative Law, vol 16. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25577-4_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25577-4_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-25575-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-25577-4

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics