Skip to main content

SDT: Maintaining the Communication Protocol Through Mixed Feedback Strategies

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Social Robotics (ICSR 2015)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 9388))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 6376 Accesses

Abstract

In our previous work, we studied how humans establish a protocol of communication in a context that requires mutual adaptation using our robot Sociable Dining Table (SDT). SDT integrates a dish robot put on the table and behaves according to the knocks that the human emits by guessing the meaning of each knocking pattern. We remarked based on previous experiments, that a personalized communication protocol is established incrementally. In fact, the communication protocol is not personalized only to the pair human-robot but also to the human robot interaction’s (HRI) instance. In the current study, we change the robot’s feedback modality (the way the robot communicates back with the human) in order that the communication protocol can be maintained over different HRI’s instances. We proposed as new feedback modality, 2 mixed-feedback strategies integrating inarticulate utterances (IU) combined with the robot’s visible behavior in order to facilitate the guessing of the robot’s internal state for the human. The first strategy consisted in anticipating the robot’s executed behavior using static IU combined with the robot’s movement (St1), and the other consisted in genuinely suggesting an adaptive IU generation method combined with the robot’s movement too (St2). In the current work, we conducted an HRI experiment to explore whether the communication protocol can be maintained on a long-term basis by integrating the 2 proposed methods. The results provide confirmatory evidence that using IU helps in establishing stable communication protocols. In addition to that it increases the attachment and the robot’s overall subjective ratings. Another important finding is that, among the two methods, the adaptive mixed feedback strategy (St2) affords better subjective results and objective performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Youssef, K., De Silva, P.R.S., Okada, M.: Investigating the mutual adaptation process to build up the protocol of communication. In: Social Robotics, pp. 571–576 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brown, P., Levinson, S.C.: Toward a more civilized design: studying the effects of computers that apologize. Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 319–345 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lee, M.K., Kielser, S., Forlizzi, J., Srinivasa, S., Rybski, P.: Gracefully mitigating breakdowns in robotic services. In: Conference on Human-robot Interaction, pp. 203–210 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Torrey, C., Fussell, S.R., Kiesler, S.: How a robot should give advice. In: Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pp. 275–282 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Takayama, L., Groom, V., Nass, C.: I’m sorry, Dave: i’m afraid i won’t do that: social aspects of human-agent conflict. In: Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 2099–2108 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Paivio, A.: Mental representations: a dual coding approach (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Breazel, C.: Designing Sociable Robots. MIT Press (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Szepesvari, C.: Algorithms for Reinforcement Learning. Synthesis lectures on artificial intelligence and machine learning (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  9. McCroskey, J.C., Teven, J.J.: Goodwill: A Reexamination of the Construct and its Measurement. Communication Monographs 66(1), 90–103 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Erbert, L.A., Floyd, K.: Affectionate expressions as face-threatening acts: Receiver assessments. Communication studies 55(2), 254–270 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bartneck, C., Kulic, D., Croft, E., Zoghbi, S.: Measurement Instruments for the Anthropomorphism, Animacy, Likeability, Perceived Intelligence, and Perceived Safety of Robots. Journal of social robotics 1(1), 71–81 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Margaret, M.B., Peter, J.L.: Measuring emotion: The self-assessment manikin and the semantic differential. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry 25(1), 49–59 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Andrews, P., Manandhar, S.: Measure of belief change as an evaluation of persuasion. In: Proceedings of the Persuasive Technology and Digital Behaviour Intervention, pp. 12–18 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Youssef Khaoula .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Khaoula, Y., De Silva, P.R., Okada, M. (2015). SDT: Maintaining the Communication Protocol Through Mixed Feedback Strategies. In: Tapus, A., André, E., Martin, JC., Ferland, F., Ammi, M. (eds) Social Robotics. ICSR 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9388. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25554-5_35

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25554-5_35

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-25553-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-25554-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics