Abstract
The chapter highlights the dynamic nature of narrative to mediate individuals’ and groups’ interactions in physical and symbolic environments. I draw on recent practice-based research to illustrate how people with much at stake in public practices narrate experience, values, and intentions in challenging circumstances. I discuss narrating as a potential process of possibility—imagining and enacting social change with narrative—a lifelike yet creative symbolic system. And, I point out that possibilities differ across life circumstances, and, thus, we must examine the contexts and practices of using narrative to imagine and enact possibilities. The foundation of this argument is “relational narrating”—an everyday process that can, with support in practice, foster the development of individual-society interactions. I discuss how relational narrating is embedded in everyday discourse, heightened during times of public crisis and developed in certain kinds of narrating contexts. Consistent with the theme of this book, “cultivating possibilities,” I argue that research with narrative should occur in the context of practices to support developmental uses of narrating so it can be a tool for social change in circumstances that challenge child and youth development. Motivation for this discussion of narrating possibilities comes from recent international research and practice with participants across the life span, addressing, in particular, contemporary problems of inequality and instability. I build this discussion of narrating possibility with concepts including narrative time, relational narrating, narrative systems, individual and societal values, and cultivating possibilities. The contribution of this chapter is to nudge our definition of narrative possibility in terms of issues and communities involved in social change characteristic of this global era. This formulation draws on the enormous gift by Jerome Bruner in his first 100 years.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Bakhtin, M. M. (1986). The problem of speech genres. In C. Emerson and M. Holquist (Trans.), Speech genres and other late essays. (p. 259–422). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
Bamberg, M. (2004). Positioning with Davey Hogan: Stories, tellings, and identities. In C. Daiute and C. Lightfoot (Eds.), Narrative Analysis: Studying the Development of Individuals in Society (pp. 135–158). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Benjamin, W. (1969). the Arcades Project.
Benjamin, W. (“Theses on the philosophy of history”—27 Walter Benjamin, “theses on the philosophy of history”. In H. Arendt (Ed.), Illuminations (H. Zohn, Trans.) New York: Schocken.
Best, S. (2012). On failing to make the past present. The Modern Language Quarterly, 73(3), 454–474. doi:10.1215/00267929-1631478
Bruner, J. (1987). Actual Minds, Possible Worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Bruner, J. (2003). Making stories: Law, literature, and life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Daiute, C. (2010). Human Development and Political Violence. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Daiute, C. (2011). “Trouble” in, around, and between narratives. Narrative Inquiry, 21(2), 329–336.
Daiute, C. (2014). Narrative Inquiry: A Dynamic Approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Daiute, C., & Nelson, K. A. (1997). Making sense of the sense-making function of narrative evaluation. Journal of Narrative and Life History, 7(1–4), 207–215.
Daiute, C., & Botero Gomez, P. (2014). Narrating change in and against time in Colombia. In D. Rellstab & C. Schlote (Eds.), Representations of War, Migration and Refugeehood: Interdisciplinary Perspectives (pp. 140–160). New York: Routlege.
Daiute, C., & Kreniske, P. (2015). Hopes, misunderstandings, and possibilities of narrating for inclusive education. In A. Surian (Ed.), Proceedings of “Openspaces for Interaction And Learning Diversities”, Conference, Aug 27–30, Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
Daiute, C., Stern, R., & Lelutiu-Weinberger, C. (2003). Negotiating violence prevention. Journal of Social Issues, 59, 83–101.
Fairclough, N. (2010). Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language (2nd ed.). New York: Pearson.
Freeman, M. (1998). Mythical time, historical time, and the narrative fabric of the self. Narrative Inquiry, 8, 27–50.
Labov, W., & Waletzky, J. (1997). Narrative analysis: Oral versions of personal experience. Journal of Narrative and Life History, 7(1–4), 3–38. (Original work published 1967).
Nelson, K. (1998). Language in Cognitive Development: The Emergence of the Mediated Mind. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Parker, I. (2015). Discourse Dynamics: Critical Analysis for Social and Individual Psychology. New York: Routledge.
Ricoeur, P. (1984). Time and Narrative (Vol. 1, 3–90, Vol. 2, 61–99). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Sassen, S. (2008). Unsettling master categories: Notes on studying the global in C.W. Mills’ footsteps. International Journal of Political Cultural Sociology, 20, 69–83.
Wortham, S. (2001). Narratives in Action: A Strategy for Research and Analysis. New York: Teachers College Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Daiute, C. (2015). Narrating Possibility. In: Marsico, G. (eds) Jerome S. Bruner beyond 100. Cultural Psychology of Education, vol 2. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25536-1_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25536-1_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-25535-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-25536-1
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)