Advertisement

Motor Skills, Motor Competence and Children: Bruner’s Ideas in the Era of Embodiment Cognition and Action

  • Luis Miguel RuizEmail author
  • José Luis Linaza
Chapter
Part of the Cultural Psychology of Education book series (CPED, volume 2)

Abstract

A most relevant contribution of Jerome Bruner to Motor Development research has been to highlight its relevance to child development and avoiding considering it as an epiphenomenon accompanying other evolutionary events of greater importance, such as cognitive, emotional or language development. Bruner’s ideas in the era of embodied cognition continue to be very interesting and show that they were very advanced for his time. His ideas present a child embedded in the context of action, a thinking body that play and explore his environment; a child that exercise his modular routines for the attainment of competence in his environment; a child that has a true impulse to apply and vary his actions to solve motor problems; a child who learns with his whole body, perceives with his whole body and communicates with the adult with his whole body. His cognition is embodied and extended to the others and to the environment. The child´s actions are his knowledge, and his knowledge is in his actions. The child plays and explores his surroundings in true perception- action cycles, where perception influences action and action influences perception. Bruner’s ideas of skill development were well beyond of his time, new and provocative. Forty years later, many of these ideas continue to be relevant today for many researchers.

Keywords

Motor skills Development Enactive representation Embodied competences 

References

  1. Avilés, C., Ruiz, L. M., Rioja, N., Navia, J. A., & Sanz, D. (2014). La pericia perceptivo-motriz y la cognición en el deporte: Del enfoque ecológico y dinámico a la enacción. Anales de Psicología, 30(2), 725–737. doi.org/ 10.6018/analesps.30.2.158611
  2. Beek, P. (1986). Perception-action coupling in the young infant. In M. G. Wade & H. T. A. Whiting (Eds.), Motor development in children: Aspects of control and coordination (pp. 187–196). Amsterdam: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.Google Scholar
  3. Beilock, S. (2015). How the body knows its mind. New York: Atria Books.Google Scholar
  4. Bernstein, N. A. (1967). The co-ordination and regulation of movement. London: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bertenthal, B. I. (1996). Origins and early development of perception, action, and representation. Annual Review of Psychology, 47, 431–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bornstein, M. H., Hahn, C. H., & Suwalsky, J. T. D. (2013). Physically developed and exploratory young infants contribute to their own long term academic achievement. Psychological Science, 24(10), 1906–1917. doi: 10.117/095679761347997
  7. Bruner, J. S. (1957). On perceptual readiness. Psychological Review, 64, 123–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bruner, J. (1964). The course of cognitive growth. American Psychologist, 19(1), 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bruner, J. (1965). The growth of mind. American Psychologist, 20(12), 1007–1017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bruner, J. (1966). Toward a theory of instruction. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Bruner, J. (1970). The growth and structure of skill. In K. Conolly (Ed.), Mechanism of motor skill development (pp. 88–103). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  12. Bruner, J. (1973a). Organization of early skilled action. Child Development, 44, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bruner, J. (1973b). Beyond the Information Given: Studies in the Psychology of Knowing. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  14. Bruner, J. (1974). The organization of early skilled action. In M. P. M. Richards (Ed.), The integration of a child into a social world (pp. 167–184). New York, NY, US: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Bruner, J. S. (1980). Autobiography. In G. Lindzey (Ed.), A history of psychology in autobiography (Vol. VII, pp. 75–151). Desarrollo cognitivo y educación (J. Palacios, Trans.). Madrid: Morata (1988, pp. 211–270).Google Scholar
  16. Bruner, J. S. (1983). In search of mind: Essays in autobiography. N. York: Harper and Row. Trad. Cast. En busca de la mente (1983), Barcelona: Paidós.Google Scholar
  17. Bruner, J. (1986). El habla del niño. Barcelona: Paidós.Google Scholar
  18. Bruner, J. (1988). Desarrollo cognitivo y Educación. Madrid: Morata.Google Scholar
  19. Bruner, J. (2001). A study of thinking. El proceso mental en el aprendizaje. Barcelona: Narcea.Google Scholar
  20. Bruner, J. (2004). Realidad Mental y Mundos Posibles. Barcelona: Gedisa.Google Scholar
  21. Bruner, J. (2006). Actos de significado. Mas allá de la revolución cognitiva. Madrid: Alianza.Google Scholar
  22. Bruner, J. (2013). La educación, puerta de la cultura. Madrid: Antonio Machado.Google Scholar
  23. Bruner, J., & Bruner, B. M. (1968). On voluntary action and its hierarchical structure. International Journal of Psychology, 3(4), 239–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Bruner, J., & Haste, H. (1990). La elaboración el sentido. Barcelona: Paidós.Google Scholar
  25. Bruner, J., & Koslowski, B. (1972). Visually preadapted constituents of manipulatory action. Perception, 1, 3–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Clearfield, M. W. (2011). Learning to walk changes infants’ social interaction. Infant Behavior and Development, 34(1), 15–25. doi: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2010.04.008
  27. Connolly, K. (Ed.). (1970). Mechanism of motor skill development. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  28. Connolly, K. (1977). The nature of motor skill development. Journal of Human Movement Studies, 3, 128–143.Google Scholar
  29. Connolly, K. (1980). The development of motor competence. In C. H. Nadeau, et al. (Eds.), Psychology of motor behaviour and sport—1979 (pp. 229–252). Human Kinetics: Champaign.Google Scholar
  30. Connolly, K. (1986). How skills are built. Research Bulletin of Educational Psychology, 31(2), 1–20.Google Scholar
  31. Connolly, K., & Bruner, J. (1973). The growth of competence. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  32. Corbetta, D. (1999). Apprentissage et organisations neuromotrices chez le bebé. In I. Olivier & H. Ripoll (Eds.), Développement psychomoteur de l’enfant et pratiques physiques et sportives (pp.21–40). Paris: Editions Revue EPS.Google Scholar
  33. Davids, K. (2001). An integrative modeling approach to the study of intentional movement behavior. In R. N. Singer, H. Hausenblas & C. Janelle (Eds.), Handbook of Sport Psychology (2nd Ed.) (pp. 144–173). Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  34. Deleau, M. (Ed.). (1987). Le développement de l’enfant. Savoir faire, savoir dire. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
  35. Durand, M. (1988). El Niño y el Deporte. Madrid: Paidós. (Children and sport).Google Scholar
  36. Freudenheim, A. M., & Manoel, E. J. (1999). Organizaçao hierárquica de um programa de açao: um estudo exploratorio. Revista Paulista de Educaçao Física, Sao Paulo, 13(2), 177–196.Google Scholar
  37. Gallagher, S. (2011). How the body shapes the mind. Oxford: Calendon Press.Google Scholar
  38. Gibson, E. J. (1988). Exploratory behaviour in the perceiving, acting, and the acquiring of knowledge. Annual Review of Psychology, 39, 1–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Giménez, R., Manoel, E. J., & Basso, L. (2006). Modularidade de Programas de açao em individuos normais e portadores da sindrome de Down. Psicología: Reflexao & Critica, 19(1), 60–65.Google Scholar
  40. Griffin, N. S., & Keogh, J. (1982). A model of movement confidence. In J. S. Kelso & J. Clark (Eds.), The development of movement control and co-ordination (pp. 213–238). Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  41. Held, R. (1965). Plasticity in sensorimotor systems. Scientific American, 2/3(5), 84–94.Google Scholar
  42. Hogan, J. C., & Hogan, R. (1975). Organization of early skilled actions: Some comments. Child Development, 46, 233–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hopkins, B. (1986). Subjective comments on the development of intersubjectivity. In M. G. Wade & H. T. A. Whiting (Eds.), Motor development in children: Aspects of control and coordination (pp. 263–286). Amsterdam: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.Google Scholar
  44. Iverson, J. M. (2010). Developing language in a developing body: the relationship between motor development and language development. Journal of Children Language, 37(2), 229–261. doi: 10.1017/S0305000909990432
  45. Jones, B. (1982). The development of intermodal co-ordination and motor control. In J. S. Kelso & J. Clark (Eds.), The development of movement control and co-ordination (pp. 95–109). Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  46. Kalnins, I. V., & Bruner, J. (1973). The coordination of visual observation and instrumental behaviour in early infancy. Perception, 2, 307–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Keogh, J., & Sudgen, D. (1985). Movement skill development. New York: MacMillan.Google Scholar
  48. Kerr, R. (1982). Motor development: A possible model. Motor Skills: Theory into Practice, 6(1), 19–28.Google Scholar
  49. Linaza, J. L. (1984). Introducción. In J. L. Linaza (Ed.), Jerome Bruner. Acción, Pensamiento y Lenguaje. (p. 79). Madrid: Alianza Psicología.Google Scholar
  50. Linaza, J. L. (1984). Jerome Bruner. Acción, Pensamiento y Lenguaje. Madrid: Alianza Psicología. (Jerome Bruner. Action, Thought and Language).Google Scholar
  51. Linaza, J. L., & Maldonado, A. (1987). El juego y el deporte en el desarrollo del niño. Barcelona: Anthropos. (Play and sport in the development of children).Google Scholar
  52. Manoel, E. J., Basso, L., Correa, U. C., & Tani, G. (2002). Modularity and hierarchical organization of action programs in human acquisition of graphic skills. Neuroscience Letters, 336, 83–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Manoel, E. J., & Connolly, K. (1997). Variability and stability in the development of skilled actions. In K. Connolly & H. Frossberg (Eds.), Neurophysiology and neuropsychology of motor development. (pp. 286–318). London: Mac Keith/Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Newell, K. M. (1986). Constraints on the development of coordination. In M. G. Wade & H. T. A. Whiting (Eds.), Motor development in children: Aspects of control and coordination (pp.341–360). Amsterdam: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.Google Scholar
  55. Newell, K. M., & Barclay, C. R. (1982). Developing knowledge about action. In J. S. Kelso & J. Clark (Eds.), The development of movement control and co-ordination (pp. 175–212). Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  56. Noë, A. (2004). Action in Perception. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  57. Palacios, J. (1988). J.S. Bruner. Desarrollo Cognitivo y Educación. Madrid: Morata. (J.S. Bruner. Cognitive development and Education).Google Scholar
  58. Pollit, E., & Caycho, T. (2010). Desarrollo motor como indicador del desarrollo infantil durante los primeros años de vida. Revista de Psicología, 28(2), 382–409.Google Scholar
  59. Rarick, G. L. (1982). Descriptive research and process-oriented explanations of the motor development of children. In J. S. Kelso & J. Clark (Eds.), The development of movement control and co-ordination (pp. 275–291). Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  60. Rosenbaum, D.A. (2005). The Cinderella of Psychology. The neglect of motor control in the science of mental life and behavior. American Psychologist, 60(4), 308–317. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.60.4.308
  61. Rowlands (2010). The new science of the mind. From extended mind to embodied phenomenology. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  62. Ruiz, L. M. (1987). Desarrollo Motor y Actividades Físicas. Madrid: Gymnos.Google Scholar
  63. Ruiz, L. M. (1995). Competencia Motriz. Elementos para comprender el proceso de aprendizaje motor en educación física. Madrid: Gymnos.Google Scholar
  64. Ruiz, L. M. (2013). Sistemas dinámicos, reflejos del niño y cintas rodantes: Esther Thelen y el estudio del desarrollo motor infantil. Revista Internacional de Ciencias del Deporte, 32, 200–204. doi: 10.5232/ricyde2012.032
  65. Ruiz, L. M., Navarro, F., Graupera, J. L., Gutiérrez, M., & Linaza, J. L. (2001). Desarrollo, Comportamiento Motor y Deporte. Madrid: Síntesis.Google Scholar
  66. Smoll, F. L. (1982). Developmental kinesiology: Toward a subdiscipline focusing on motor development. In J.S. Kelso & J. Clark (Eds.), The development of movement control and co-ordination (pp. 319–354). Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  67. Surmava, A. (2010). Ilyenkov and the revolution in psychology. Russian Studies in Philosophy, 48(4), 36–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Thelen, E. (1984). Learning to walk: Ecological demands and phylogenetic constraints. Advances in Infancy Research, 3, 213–260.Google Scholar
  69. Thelen, E. (1985). Developmental origins of motor coordination: Leg movements in human infants. Developmental Psychobiology, 18, 1–22.Google Scholar
  70. Thelen, E. (1992). Development as a dynamic system. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1, 189–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Thelen, E. (1995). Motor development. A new synthesis. American Psychologist., 50(2), 79–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Thelen, E., & Smith, L. B. (1998). A dynamic systems approach to the development of cognition and action. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  73. Van Rossum, J. H. A. (1987). Motor development an practice: The variability hypothesis in perspective. Amsterdam: Free University.Google Scholar
  74. Varela, F., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1992) The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. Cambridge: MIT press Trad. Cast. De cuerpo presente: Las ciencias cognitivas y la experiencia humana (3ª reimpresión). Barcelona: Gedisa. (2005).Google Scholar
  75. Vygotsky, L. (1966). Play an its role in the mental development of a child. Soviet Psychology, 5(3), 6–18.Google Scholar
  76. Wall, A. E. (1986). A knowledge-based approach to motor skill acquisition. In M. G. Wade & H. T. A. Whiting (Eds.), Motor development in children: Aspects of control and coordination (pp. 33–52). Amsterdam: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.Google Scholar
  77. White, B. L., Castle, P. W., & Held, R. (1964). Observations of the development of visually-directed reaching. Child Development, 35, 349–364.Google Scholar
  78. Wilson, M. (2002). Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 625–636.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Departamento de Ciencias Sociales de la Actividad Física, Deporte y Ocio, Facultad de Ciencias del Deporte.-INEFUniversidad Politécnica MadridMadridSpain
  2. 2.Departamento de Psicología Evolutiva y de la EducaciónUniversidad Autónoma de Madrid AvdaMadridSpain

Personalised recommendations