Skip to main content

Discovering Commonly Shared Semantic Concepts of Eligibility Criteria for Learning Clinical Trial Design

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Web-Based Learning -- ICWL 2015 (ICWL 2015)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 9412))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Discovering commonly shared semantic concepts of eligibility criteria can facilitate hospitals in recruiting appropriate target population and empower patients with more effective result ranking of concept-based search, as well as assist researchers in understanding clinical trial design. This study aims to identify commonly shared semantic concepts of eligibility criteria through the identification of eligibility criteria concepts for each disease. An automated approach for extracting semantic concepts from eligibility criteria texts is proposed. For each disease, commonly shared semantic concepts are determined for reviewing the commonly shared concepts of clinical trials. Our experiment dataset are 145,745 clinical trials associated with 5,488 different types of diseases on ClinicalTrials.gov. 5,508,491 semantic concepts are extracted with 459,936 being unique. We further analyze its application on assisting researchers in learning disease-specific clinical trial design.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://www.cdisc.org/.

  2. 2.

    http://www.nlm.nih.gov/research/umls/quickstart.html.

  3. 3.

    http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT00105716

References

  1. Ross, J., Tu, S., Carini, S., Sim, I.: Analysis of eligibility criteria complexity in clinical trials. In: Proceedings of AMIA Summits on Translational Science 2010, pp. 46-50 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Vellas, B., Pesce, A., Robert, P.H., et al.: AMPA workshop on challenges faced by investigators conducting Alzheimer’s disease clinical trials. Alzheimers Dement. 7(4), e109–e117 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Campbell, M.K., Snowdon, C., Francis, D., et al.: Recruitment to randomised trials: strategies for trial enrollment and participation study. The STEPS study. Health Technol. Assess. 11(48), iii, ix–105 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Tu, S.W., Peleg, M., Carini, S., et al.: A practical method for transforming free-text eligibility criteria into computable criteria. J. Biomed. Inform. 44(2), 239–250 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Weng, C., Wu, X., Luo, Z., et al.: EliXR: an approach to eligibility criteria extraction and representation. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 18(Suppl 1), i116–i124 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Milian, K., Bucur, A., Teije A.T.: Formalization of clinical trial eligibility criteria: Evaluation of a pattern-based approach. In: IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine, pp. 1–4 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Boland, M.R., Miotto, R., Gao, J., Weng, C.: Feasibility of feature-based indexing, clustering, and search of clinical trials. A case study of breast cancer trials from ClinicalTrials.gov. Methods Inf. Med. 52(5), 382–394 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Manley, G.T., Diaz-Arrastia, R., Brophy, M., et al.: Common data elements for traumatic brain injury: recommendations from the interagency working group on demographics and clinical assessment. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 91(11), 1641–1649 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. National institute of health - NINDS Common Data Elements. http://www.ninds.nih.gov/research/clinical_research/toolkit/common_data_elements.htm. Accessed 2015

  10. NINDS. http://www.commondataelements.ninds.nih.gov/projreview.aspx. Accessed 2015

  11. Fink, E., Kokku, P.K., Nikiforou, S., et al.: Selection of patients for clinical trials: an interactive web-based system. Artif. Intell. Med. 31, 241–254 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. NerveCenter: NINDS common data element project: a long-awaited breakthrough in streamlining trials. Ann. Neurol. 68(1), A11–A13 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Grinnon, S.T., Miller, K., Marler, J.R., et al.: National institute of neurological disorders and stroke common data element project - approach and methods. Clin. Trials 9(3), 322–329 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Loring, D.W., Lowenstein, D.H., Barbaro, N.M., et al.: Common data elements in epilepsy research: development and implementation of the NINDS epilepsy FST project. Epilepsia 52(6), 1186–1191 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Luo, Z., Miotto, R., Weng, C.: A human-computer collaborative approach to identifying common data elements in clinical trial eligibility criteria. J. Biomed. Inform. 46, 33–39 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Miotto, R., Weng, C.: Unsupervised mining of frequent tags for clinical eligibility text indexing. J. Biomed. Inform. 46(6), 1145–1151 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. UMLS - Unified Medical Language System. http://www.nlm.nih.gov/research/umls/. Accessed 2015

  18. Hao, T., Rusanov, A., Boland, M.R., Weng, C.: Clustering clinical trials with similar eligibility criteria features. J. Biomed. Inform. 52, 112–120 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lee-Smeltzer, K.H.: Finding the needle: controlled vocabularies, resource discovery, and Dublin Core. Libr. Collect. Acquis. Techn. Serv. 24(2), 205–215 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Miotto, R., Jiang, S., Weng, C.: eTACTS: a method for dynamically filtering clinical trial search results. J. Biomed. Inform. 46(6), 1060–1067 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hao, T., Weng, C.: Adaptive semantic tag mining from heterogeneous clinical research texts. Methods Inf. Med. 54(2), 164–170 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Extracting key phrases with NLTK in Python, GitHub Gist. https://gist.github.com/alexbowe/879414. Accessed 2015

  23. The Stanford Parser: A statistical parser. http://nlp.stanford.edu/software/lex-parser.shtml. Accessed 2015

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant No. 61403088).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guimin Huang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hao, T., Chen, X., Huang, G. (2015). Discovering Commonly Shared Semantic Concepts of Eligibility Criteria for Learning Clinical Trial Design. In: Li, F., Klamma, R., Laanpere, M., Zhang, J., Manjón, B., Lau, R. (eds) Advances in Web-Based Learning -- ICWL 2015. ICWL 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9412. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25515-6_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25515-6_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-25514-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-25515-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics