Abstract
Glaucoma is the leading cause of blindness in the world. It is an optic neuropathy disease associated with elevated intraocular pressure. Glaucoma encompass a group of various clinical presentations that share the same anatomical feature, a progressive loss of retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) superior to the age-related loss. This chapter deals about the pharmacology of conventional antiglaucoma drugs and newer drugs/pathways which are under investigation. Medical management of glaucoma has been discussed with the concept of reaching target intraocular pressure (“Target IOP”) using pharmacological agents. Newer concept of neuro-protectants for the management of glaucoma has also been included in the deliberations.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Kingman S. Glaucoma is second leading cause of blindness globally. Bull World Health Organ. 2004;82:887–8.
George R, Ve RS, Vijaya L. Glaucoma in India: estimated burden of disease. J Glaucoma. 2010;19:391–7.
Johnstone MA, Albert DM. Prostaglandin –induced hair growth. Surv Opthalmol. 2002;47 Suppl 1:S185–202.
Pfeiffer N, Thieme H. Prostaglandin analogues. In: Shaarawy T, Sherwood MB, Crowston JG, Hitchings RA, editors. Glaucoma-medical diagnosis and therapy. London. Elsveir Ltd; 2015. p. 543.
Tripathi KD. Essentials of Medical Pharmacology, New Delhi: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers. 2008 (5th ed), p.674.
Rao PV, Epstein DL. Rho GTPase/Rho kinase as a novel target for the treatment of glaucoma. BioDrugs. 2007;21:167–77.
Challa P, Arnold JJ. Rho-kinase inhibitors offer a new approach in the treatment of glaucoma. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2014;23(1):81–95.
Tanihara H, Inatani M, Honjo M, et al. Intraocular pressure-lowering effects and safety of topical administration of a selective ROCK inhibitor, SNJ-1656, in healthy volunteers. Arch Ophthalmol. 2008;126:309–15.
Hahmann C, Schroeter T. Rho-kinase inhibitors as therapeutics: from pan inhibition to isoform selectivity. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2010;67(2):171–7.
Heijl A, Leske MC, Bengtsson B, et al. Reduction of intraocular pressure and glaucoma progression: results from the early manifest glaucoma trial. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002;120:1268–79.
Feiner L, Piltz-Seymour JR. Collaborative Initial Glaucoma Treatment Study: a summary of results to date. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2003;14:106–11.
Hodapp E, Parrish 2nd RK, Anderson DR. Clinical decisions in glaucoma. St Louis: Mosby and Co; 1993. p. 63–92.
Jampel HD. Target pressure in glaucoma therapy. J Glaucoma. 1997;6:133–8.
Lichter PR, Musch DC, Gillespie BW, et al. Interim clinical outcomes in the Collaborative Initial Glaucoma Treatment Study comparing initial treatment randomized to medications or surgery. Ophthalmology. 2001;108:1943–53.
American academy of ophthalmology basic and clinical science course section 10. Glaucoma. 2004–2005.
Bito LZ. A new approach to the medical management of glaucoma, from the bench to the clinic, and beyond: the Proctor Lecture. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001;42(6):1126–33.
Camras CB, Siebold EC, Lustgarten JS, et al. Maintained reduction of intraocular pressure by prostaglandin F2 alpha-1-isopropyl ester applied in multiple doses in ocular hypertensive and glaucoma patients. Ophthalmology. 1989;96(9):1329–36; discussion 1336–27.
Lim KS, Nau CB, O’Byrne MM, et al. Mechanism of action of bimatoprost, latanoprost, and travoprost in healthy subjects. A crossover study. Ophthalmology. 2008;115(5):790–5 e794.
Walters TR, DuBiner HB, Carpenter SP, Khan B, VanDenburgh AM. 24-hour IOP control with once-daily bimatoprost, timolol gel-forming solution, or latanoprost: a 1-month, randomized, comparative clinical trial. Surv Ophthalmol. 2004;49 Suppl 1:S26–35.
Alm A, Stjernschantz J. Effects on intraocular pressure and side effects of 0.005% latanoprost applied once daily, evening or morning. A comparison with timolol. Scandinavian Latanoprost Study Group. Ophthalmology. 1995;102(12):1743–52.
Sjoquist B, Stjernschantz J. Ocular and systemic pharmacokinetics of latanoprost in humans. Surv Ophthalmol. 2002;47 Suppl 1:S6–12.
Sharif NA, Kelly CR, Crider JY, Williams GW, Xu SX. Ocular hypotensive FP prostaglandin (PG) analogs: PG receptor subtype binding affinities and selectivities, and agonist potencies at FP and other PG receptors in cultured cells. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 2003;19(6):501–15.
Gross RL, Peace JH, Smith SE, et al. Duration of IOP reduction with travoprost BAK-free solution. J Glaucoma. 2008;17(3):217–22.
Stewart WC, Kolker AE, Stewart JA, Leech J, Jackson AL. Conjunctival hyperemia in healthy subjects after short-term dosing with latanoprost, bimatoprost, and travoprost. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003;135(3):314–20.
Konstas AG, Katsimbris JM, Lallos N, Boukaras GP, Jenkins JN, Stewart WC. Latanoprost 0.005% versus bimatoprost 0.03% in primary open-angle glaucoma patients. Ophthalmology. 2005;112(2):262–6.
Goldberg I. Comparison of tropical travoprost eye drops given once daily and timolol 0.5% given twice daily in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. J Glaucoma. 2001;10:414–22.
Cohen JS, Gross RL, Cheetham JK, VanDenburgh AM, Bernstein P, Whitcup SM. Two-year double-masked comparison of bimatoprost with timolol in patients with glaucoma or ocular hypertension. Surv Ophthalmol. 2004;49 Suppl 1:S45–52.
Bayer A, Weiler W, Oeverhaus U, Skrotzki FE, Stewart WC. Two year follow-up of latanoprost 0.005% monotherapy after changing from previous glaucoma therapies. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 2004;20(6):470–8.
Boger III WP. Short term “escape” and long term “drift”: the dissipation effects of the beta adrenergic agents. Surv Ophthalmol. 1983;28(Suppl):235–42.
Gieser SC, Juzych M, Robin AL, et al. Clinical pharmacology of adrenergic drugs. In: Ritch R, Shields MB, Krupin T, editors. The glaucomas. St. Louis: Mosby; 1996.
Allingham RR, Damji K, Freedman S, et al. Adrenergic receptor antagonists. In: Shield’s textbook of glaucoma. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2005.
Dunham CN, Spaide RF, Dunham G. The contralateral reduction of intraocular pressure by timolol. Br J Ophthalmol. 1994;78:38–40.
Fechtner RD. Beta blockers. In: Netland PA, Allen RC, editors. Glaucoma medical therapy principles and management. San Francisco: The Foundation of the American Academy of Ophthalmology; 1999.
Reitsamer HA, Posey M, Kiel JW. Effects of a topical alpha2 adrenergic agonist on ciliary blood flow and aqueous production in rabbits. Exp Eye Res. 2006;82(3):405–15.
Toris CB, Camras CB, Yablonski ME. Acute versus chronic effects of brimonidine on aqueous humor dynamics in ocular hypertensive patients. Am J Ophthalmol. 1999;128(1):8–14.
Yuksel N, Guler C, Caglar Y, Elibol O. Apraclonidine and clonidine: a comparison of efficacy and side effects in normal and ocular hypertensive volunteers. Int Ophthalmol. 1992;16(4–5):337–42.
Whitson JT, Ochsner KI, Moster MR, et al. The safety and intraocular pressure-lowering efficacy of brimonidine tartrate 0.15% preserved with polyquaternium-1. Ophthalmology. 2006;113(8):1333–9.
Mungan NK, Wilson TW, Nischal KK, Koren G, Levin AV. Hypotension and bradycardia in infants after the use of topical brimonidine and beta-blockers. J AAPOS. 2003;7(1):69–70.
Schuman JS. Short- and long-term safety of glaucoma drugs. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2002;1(2):181–94.
Matsui H, Murakami M, Wynns GC, et al. Membrane carbonic anhydrase (IV) and ciliary epithelium. Carbonic anhydrase activity is present in the basolateral membranes of the non-pigmented ciliary epithelium of rabbit eyes. Exp Eye Res. 1996;62(4):409–17.
Turtz CA, Turtz AI. Toxicity due to acetazolamide (diamox). AMA Arch Ophthalmol. 1958;60(1):130–1.
Michaud JE, Friren B, International Brinzolamide Adjunctive Study Group. Comparison of topical brinzolamide 1% and dorzolamide 2% eye drops given twice daily in addition to timolol 0.5% in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. Am J Ophthalmol. 2001;132(2):235–43.
Siesky B, Harris A, Cantor LB, et al. A comparative study of the effects of brinzolamide and dorzolamide on retinal oxygen saturation and ocular microcirculation in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol. 2008;92(4):500–4.
Friedland BR, Mallonee J, Anderson DR. Short-term dose response characteristics of acetazolamide in man. Arch Ophthalmol. 1977;95(10):1809–12.
Alward WL. Medical management of glaucoma. N Engl J Med. 1998;339(18):1298–307.
Sweeney KR, Chapron DJ, Brandt JL, Gomolin IH, Feig PU, Kramer PA. Toxic interaction between acetazolamide and salicylate: case reports and a pharmacokinetic explanation. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1986;40(5):518–24.
Bateson MC, Lant AF. Dietary potassium and diuretic therapy. Lancet. 1973;2(7825):381–2.
Worthen DM. Effect of pilocarpine drops on the diurnal intraocular pressure variation in patients with glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol. 1976;15:784–7.
Quigley HA, Pollack IP. Intraocular pressure control with twice daily pilocarpine in two vehicle solutions. Ann Ophthalmol. 1977;9:427–30.
Van Hoose MC, Leaders FE. The role of cornea in biological response to pilocarpine. Invest Ophthalmol. 1974;13:377–83.
Zimmerman TJ, Wheeler TM. Miotics: side effects and ways to avoid them. Ophthalmology. 1982;89(1):76–80.
Pape LG, Forbes M. Retinal detachment and miotic therapy. Am J Ophthalmol. 1978;85(4):558–66.
Eilderton TE, Farmati O, Zsigmond EK. Reduction in plasma cholinesterase levels after prolonged administration of echothiophate iodide eyedrops. Can Anaesth Soc J. 1968;15(3):291–6.
Singh A. Medical therapy of glaucoma. Ophthalmol Clin North Am. 2005;18:397–408.
McCurdy DK, Schneider B, Scheie HG. Oral glycerol: the mechanism of intraocular hypotension. Am J Ophthalmol. 1966;61:1244–9.
Danesh-Meyer HV, Levin LA. Neuroprotection: extrapolating from neurologic diseases to the eye. Am J Ophthalmol. 2009;148(2):186–91 e182.
Chang EE, Goldberg JL. Glaucoma 2.0: neuroprotection, neuroregeneration, neuroenhancement. Ophthalmology. 2012;119(5):979–86.
Comparison of glaucomatous progression between untreated patients with normal-tension glaucoma and patients with therapeutically reduced intraocular pressures. Collaborative Normal-Tension Glaucoma Study Group. Am J Ophthalmol. 1998;126(4):487–97.
The Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study (AGIS): 7. The relationship between control of intraocular pressure and visual field deterioration. The AGIS investigators. Am J Ophthalmol. 2000;130(4):429–40.
Leske MC, Heijl A, Hussein M, Bengtsson B, Hyman L, Komaroff E. Factors for glaucoma progression and the effect of treatment: the early manifest glaucoma trial. Arch Ophthalmol. 2003;121(1):48–56.
Osborne NN. Pathogenesis of ganglion “cell death” in glaucoma and neuroprotection: focus on ganglion cell axonal mitochondria. Prog Brain Res. 2008;173:339–52.
Shih GC, Calkins DJ. Secondary neuroprotective effects of hypotensive drugs and potential mechanisms of action. Expert Rev Ophthalmol. 2012;7(2):161–75.
Limb GA, Martin KR. Current prospects in optic nerve protection and regeneration: sixth ARVO/Pfizer Ophthalmics Research Institute conference. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52(8):5941–54.
Quigley HA. Clinical trials for glaucoma neuroprotection are not impossible. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2012;23(2):144–54.
Baltmr A, Duggan J, Nizari S, Salt TE, Cordeiro MF. Neuroprotection in glaucoma – is there a future role? Exp Eye Res. 2010;91(5):554–66.
Osborne NN, Chidlow G, Nash MS, Wood JP. The potential of neuroprotection in glaucoma treatment. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 1999a;10(2):82–92.
Osborne NN, Ugarte M, Chao M, et al. Neuroprotection in relation to retinal ischemia and relevance to glaucoma. Surv Ophthalmol. 1999b;43 Suppl 1:S102–28.
Newman NJ, Biousse V, David R, et al. Prophylaxis for second eye involvement in leber hereditary optic neuropathy: an open-labeled, nonrandomized multicenter trial of topical brimonidine purite. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005;140(3):407–15.
Wilhelm B, Ludtke H, Wilhelm H. Efficacy and tolerability of 0.2% brimonidine tartrate for the treatment of acute non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (NAION): a 3-month, double-masked, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2006;244(5):551–8.
Krupin T, Liebmann JM, Greenfield DS, Ritch R, Gardiner S. A randomized trial of brimonidine versus timolol in preserving visual function: results from the Low-Pressure Glaucoma Treatment Study. Am J Ophthalmol. 2011;151(4):671–81.
Cordeiro MF, Levin LA. Clinical evidence for neuroprotection in glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 2011;152(5):715–6.
Hare WA, WoldeMussie E, Lai RK, et al. Efficacy and safety of memantine treatment for reduction of changes associated with experimental glaucoma in monkey, I: functional measures. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004a;45(8):2625–39.
Hare WA, WoldeMussie E, Weinreb RN, et al. Efficacy and safety of memantine treatment for reduction of changes associated with experimental glaucoma in monkey, II: structural measures. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004b;45(8):2640–51.
Reisberg B, Doody R, Stoffler A, Schmitt F, Ferris S, Mobius HJ. Memantine in moderate-to-severe Alzheimer’s disease. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(14):1333–41.
Osborne NN. Recent clinical findings with memantine should not mean that the idea of neuroprotection in glaucoma is abandoned. Acta Ophthalmol. 2009;87(4):450–4.
Sena DF, Lindsley K. Neuroprotection for treatment of glaucoma in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;2:CD006539.
Scozzafava A, Supuran CT, Glaucoma and the applications of carbonic anhydrase inhibitors. Subcell Biochem. 2014;75:349–59.
Levin LA, Danesh-Meyer HV. Lost in translation: bumps in the road between bench and bedside. JAMA. 2010;303(15):1533–4.
Wang SK, Chang RT. An emerging treatment option for glaucoma: Rho kinase inhibitors. Clin Ophthalmol. 2014;8:883–90.
Yang H, Leffler CT. Hybrid dendrimer hydrogel/poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) nanoparticle platform: an advanced vehicle for topical delivery of antiglaucoma drugs and a likely solution to improving compliance and adherence in glaucoma management. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 2013;29(2):166–72.
Fulgencio Gde O, Viana FA, Ribeiro RR, Yoshida MI, Faraco AG, Cunha-Junior Ada S. New mucoadhesive chitosan film for ophthalmic drug delivery of timolol maleate: in vivo evaluation. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 2012;28(4):350–8.
Manickavasagam D, Oyewumi MO. Critical assessment of implantable drug delivery devices in glaucoma management. J Drug Deliv. 2013;2013:895013.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dada, T., Ichhpujani, P., Senthilkumari, S., Bron, A. (2016). Ocular Hypotensives and Neuroprotectants in Glaucoma. In: Velpandian, T. (eds) Pharmacology of Ocular Therapeutics. Adis, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25498-2_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25498-2_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Adis, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-25496-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-25498-2
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)