Skip to main content

Simulation Overview

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Understanding Phase Contrast MR Angiography

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Electrical and Computer Engineering ((BRIEFSELECTRIC))

  • 920 Accesses

Abstract

MRI Simulator is based on numerical solution of the Bloch Equation. The numerical solution is obtained as a time update form of the magnetization vector. Parameters of this time update coefficients are shown to be related to the pulse sequence parameters and gradient amplitudes. The contents include application of the time update solution for simulation of Gradient Echo (GRE) sequences. Influence of T2* and susceptibility effects are also discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Haacke EM, Brown RW, Thompson MR, Venkatesan R (1989) Magnetic resonance imaging: physical principles and sequence design. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cattin HB, Collewet G (2005) Numerical implementation of the Bloch equations to simulate magnetization dynamics and imaging. J MRI 173

    Google Scholar 

  3. Klepaczko A, Szczypinski P, Dwojakowski G, Strzelecki M, Materka A (2014) Computer simulation of magnetic resonance angiography imaging: model description and validation. Plosone 9:e93689

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cattin HB, Collewet G, Belaroussi B, Jalmes HS, Odet C (2005) The SIMRI project: a versatile and interactive MRI simulator. J Mag Res 173:97–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Jurczuk K, Kretowskiv BJJ, Eliat PA, Jalmes HS, Wendling JB (2013) Computational modeling of MR flow imaging by the lattice Boltzmann method and Bloch equation. Mag Res Imaging 31:1163–1173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Jurczuk K, Kretowski M, Eliat PA, Jalmes HS, Wendling JB (2014) In Silico modeling of magnetic resonance flow imaging in complex vascular networks. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 33:11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kwan RKS, Evans AC, Pike GB (1999) MRI simulation-based evaluation of image-processing and classification methods. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 18(11):1085–1097

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cao Y, Shen Z, Thomas MA, Chenevert L, Ewing JR (2006) Estimate of vascular permeability and cerebral blood volume using Gd-DTPA contrast enhancement and dynamic T2*-weighted MRI. Magn Reson Imaging 24:288–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Spritzer CE, Pelc NJ, Lee JN, Evans AJ, Sostman HD, Riederer SJ (1999) MRI simulation-based evaluation of image-processing and classification methods. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 18:11

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bittoun J, Taquin J, Sauzade M (1984) A computer algorithm for the simulation of any nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) imaging method. Magn Reson Imaging 2:113–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Duyn J (2013) MR susceptibility imaging. JMR 299:198–207

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ruan C. MRI artifacts: mechanism and control. http://ric.uthscsa.edu/personalpages/lancaster/D12_Projects_2003/MRI_Artifacts.pdf

  13. Bernstein MA, King KF, Zhou XJ (2004) Hand book of MRI pulse sequences. Elsevier Academic Press, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  14. Haacke EM, Mittal S, Wu Z, Neelavalli J, Cheng YC (2009) Susceptibility-weighted imaging: technical aspects and clinical applications, Part 1. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 30:19–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Cao Z, Oh S, Sica CT, Mc-Garrity JM, Horan T, Luo W, Collins CM (2014) Bloch-based MRI system simulator considering realistic electromagnetic fields for calculation of signal, noise, and specific absorption rate. Magn Reson Med 72:237–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Jochimsen TH, Sch€afer A, Bammer R, Moseley ME (2006) Efficient simulation of magnetic resonance imaging with Bloch–Torrey equations using intra-voxel magnetization gradients. J Magn Reson 180:29–38

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gudbjartsson H, Patz S (1995) Simultaneous calculation of flow and diffusion sensitivity in steady-state free precession imaging. Magn Reson Med 34:567–579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Marshall I (1999) Simulation of in-plane flow imaging Concepts. Magn Reson 11:379–392

    Google Scholar 

  19. Yarnykh VL (2010) Optimal radiofrequency and gradient spoiling for improved accuracy of T1 and B1 measurements using fast steady state techniques. Magn Reson Med 63:1610–1626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Neelavalli J, Cheng YC, Jiang J, Haacke EM (2009) Removing background phase variations in susceptibility-weighted imaging using a fast Forward-Field Calculation. J Magn Res Imaging 29:937–948

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joseph Suresh Paul .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Suresh Paul, J., Gouri Raveendran, S. (2016). Simulation Overview. In: Understanding Phase Contrast MR Angiography. SpringerBriefs in Electrical and Computer Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25483-8_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25483-8_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-25481-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-25483-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics