Abstract
This chapter is the first chapter of Part III of this book, which concentrates on quality in product differentiation and outsourcing settings. In Chap. 3, we noted that quality information asymmetry under product homogeneity could lead to a quality “free ride,” which might jeopardize certain firms’ profits and product quality. Therefore, in order to prevent such harmful results, it is important for firms to differentiate their products from that of their competitors, so that consumers will be able to identify the products of different firms and their quality. In this chapter, we present a supply chain network model with quality competition in differentiated products, where the product of each firm is substitutable but differentiated by a brand or label. We first present the equilibrium model and derive alternative variational inequality formulations. We then construct the projected dynamical systems model, which provides a continuous-time evolution of the firms’ product shipments and product quality levels. The stability analysis results are also presented, and a discrete-time version of the continuous-time adjustment process is constructed, which yields an algorithm with closed form expressions at each iteration. The algorithm is then utilized to compute solutions to several numerical examples. We also include sensitivity analysis results for minimum quality standards. The framework developed in this chapter can serve as the foundation for the modeling and analysis of competition among firms in industries ranging from food to pharmaceuticals to durable goods and high tech products, as well as Internet services, where quality and product differentiation are seminal.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Acharyya, R. (2005). Consumer targeting under quality competition in a liberalized vertically differentiated market. Journal of Economic Development, 30(1), 129–150.
Anderson, S. P., & Palma, A. (2001). Product diversity in asymmetric oligopoly: Is the quality of consumer goods too low? The Journal of Industrial Economics, 49(2), 113–135.
Aoki, R. (1991). R&D competition for product innovation: An endless race. American Economic Review, 81(2), 252–256.
Berndt, E. R., Bui, L., Reily, D. R., & Urban, G. L. (1995). Information, marketing, and pricing in the U.S. antiulcer drug market. The American Economic Review, 85(2), 100–105.
Bernstein, J., & Nadiri, M. I. (1991). Product demand, cost of production, spillovers, and the social rate of return to R&D (NBER Working Paper No. 3625). Cambridge.
Bischi, G. I., Chiarella, C., Kopel, M., & Szidarovsky, F. (2009). Nonlinear oligopolies: Stability and bifurcations. Berlin: Springer.
Cohen, W. M., & Klepper, S. (1996). Firm size and the nature of innovation within industries: The case of process and product R&D. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 78(2), 232–243.
Cournot, A. A. (1838). Researches into the mathematical principles of the theory of wealth (English Trans.). London: MacMillan.
Dafermos, S., & Nagurney, A. (1987). Oligopolistic and competitive behavior of spatially separated markets. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 17, 245–254.
D’Aspremont, C., Gabszewicz, J. J., & Thisse, J. F. (1979). On Hotelling’s “Stability in competition”. Econometrica, 47, 1145–1150.
Dixit, A. K., & Stiglitz, J. E. (1977). Monopolistic competition and optimum product diversity. American Economic Review, 67(3), 297–308.
Dupuis, P., & Nagurney, A. (1993). Dynamical systems and variational inequalities. Annals of Operations Research, 44, 9–42.
Economides, N. (1989). Quality variations and maximal differentiation. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 19, 21–29.
Gabay, D., & Moulin, H. (1980). On the uniqueness and stability of Nash equilibria in noncooperative games. In A. Bensoussan, P. Kleindorfer, & C. S. Tapiero (Eds.), Applied stochastic control in econometrics and management science (pp. 271–294). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Holcombe, R. G. (2009). Product differentiation and economic progress. The Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, 12(1), 17–35.
Hotelling, H. (1929). Stability in competition. The Economic Journal, 39(153), 41–57.
Johnson, J. P., & Myatt, D. P. (2003). Multiproduct quality competition: Fighting brands and product line pruning. American Economic Review, 93(3), 748–774.
Krantz, M. (2012, March 1). Microsoft, Intel, Google outspend Apple on R&D. USA Today. http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/money/perfi/columnist/krantz/story/2012-03-20/a-pple-marketing--research-and-development-spending/53673126/1
Lilien, G. L., & Yoon, E. (1990). The timing of competitive market entry: An exploratory study of new industrial products. Management Science, 36(5), 568–585.
Masoumi, A. H., Yu, M., & Nagurney, A. (2012). A supply chain generalized network oligopoly model for pharmaceuticals under brand differentiation and perishability. Transportation Research E, 48, 762–780.
Matsumoto, A., & Szidarovsky, F. (2011). Price and quantity competition in dynamic oligopolies with product differentiation. Revista Investigacion Operacional, 32(3), 204–219.
Motta, M. (1993). Endogenous quality choice: Price vs. quantity competition. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 41(2), 113–131.
Nagurney, A. (1999). Network economics: A variational inequality approach (2nd and Rev. ed.). Boston: Kluwer Academic.
Nagurney, A., Dupuis, P., & Zhang, D. (1994). A dynamical systems approach for network oligopolies and variational inequalities. Annals of Regional Science, 28, 263–283.
Nagurney, A., & Li, D. (2014). A dynamic network oligopoly model with transportation costs, product differentiation, and quality competition. Computational Economics, 44(2), 201–229.
Nagurney, A., Yu, M., Masoumi, A. H., & Nagurney, L. S. (2013). Networks against time: Supply chain analytics for perishable products. New York: Springer.
Nagurney, A., & Zhang, D. (1996). Projected dynamical systems and variational inequalities with applications. Boston: Kluwer Academic.
Nash, J. F. (1950). Equilibrium points in n-person games. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 36, 48–49.
Nash, J. F. (1951). Noncooperative games. Annals of Mathematics, 54, 286–298.
Schumpeter, J. A. (1943). Capitalism, socialism and democracy (3rd ed.). London: George Allen and Unwin.
Shankar, V., Carpenter G. S., & Krishnamurthi, L. (1998). Late mover advantage: How innovative late entrants outsell pioneers. Journal of Marketing Research, 35(1), 54–70.
Steiner, M., Bugen, D., Kazanchy, B., Knox, W., Prentice, M. V., & Goldfarb, L. S. (2007). The continuing evolution of the pharmaceutical industry: Career challenges and opportunities. Chatham: Regent Atlantic Capital, white paper.
Yu, M., & Nagurney, A. (2013). Competitive food supply chain networks with application to fresh produce. European Journal of Operational Research, 224(2), 273–282.
Zhang, D., & Nagurney, A. (1995). On the stability of projected dynamical systems. Journal of Optimization Theory and Its Applications, 85, 97–124.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Nagurney, A., Li, D. (2016). Supply Chain Network Oligopolies with Product Differentiation. In: Competing on Supply Chain Quality. Springer Series in Supply Chain Management, vol 2. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25451-7_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25451-7_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-25449-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-25451-7
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)