Abstract
Expectations have been high that offering online, that is, electronic or “e”-communication channels in public participation will improve its outreach and quality. However, so far, there is no empirical evidence that confirms these hopes. Applying a variety of research methods, this chapter presents empirical findings on the advantages and disadvantages of online communication compared to face-to-face communication in six consultation processes and seven collaborative citizen panels. To control for contextual differences, one of the consultation processes has been set up paralleling online and face-to-face meetings. In this case, organizers showed a preference for face-to-face meetings as regards the content of contributions and the style of discussion. For the citizen panels, collaborating with local governments to achieve climate targets, impacts in terms of carbon equivalents (CO2e) savings, and dropout rates have been compared for parallel processes online and via telephone. These comparisons do not, however, deliver clear performance profiles of the communication channels or a generalizable assessment of their appropriateness for particular objectives. The factors influencing the choice of communication channels are complex, and the analysis shows that assessments depend on the type of participation and the role of an actor in the process as well as on time frames and contexts in which the assessments are made. Showing that none of the channels offers clear advantages over the other, we conclude that practitioners are well advised to follow a multichannel strategy and offer a media mix of online and traditional modes of participation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Coleman S, Gøtze J (2001) Bowling together: online public engagement in policy deliberation. Hansard Society, London
Daft RL, Lengel RH (1984) Information richness: a new approach to managerial behavior and organization design. Res Organ Behav 6:191–233
Davis FD (1989) Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q 13(3):318–340
Davis A (2010) New media and fat democracy: the paradox of online participation. New Media Soc 12(5):745–761
Di Gennaro C, Dutton WH (2006) The internet and the public: online and offline political participation in the United Kingdom. Parliam Aff 59(2):299–313
Dutton WH (1999) Society on the line: information politics in the digital age. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Fulk J, Schmitz J, Steinfeld CW (1990) A social influence model of technology use. In: Fulk J, Steinfeld CW (eds) Organizations and communication technology. Sage, Newbury Park, pp 117–140
Gibson R, Cantijoch M (2013) Conceptualizing and measuring participation in the age of the internet: is online political engagement really different to offline? J Polit 75(3):701–716
Johannessen MR, Skiftenes Flak L, Sæbø Ø (2012) Choosing the right medium for municipal eparticipation based on stakeholder expectations. In: Tambouris E, Macintosh A, Sæbø Ø (eds) ePart 2012. Springer, LNCS 7444, pp 25–36
Kaye BK, Johnson TJ (2003) From here to obscurity? media substitution theory and traditional media in an on-line world. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol 54(3):260–273
Kubicek H, Schmid U, Wagner H (1997) Bürgerinformation durch ‘neue’ Medien? Analysen und Fallstudien zur Etablierung elektronischer Informationssysteme im Alltag. Westdeutscher Verlag, Opladen
Kubicek H, Lippa B, Westholm H (2009) Medienmix in der lokalen Demokratie. edition sigma, Berlin
Lee U (2003) Panel attrition in survey data: a literature review. CSSR working paper no. 41
Macintosh A (2003) Using information and communication technologies to enhance citizen engagement in the policy process. In: OECD (ed) Promise and problems of e-democracy: challenges of online citizen engagement. OECD, Paris, pp 19–142
Oser J, Hooghe M, Marien S (2012) Is online participation distinct from offline participation? A latent class analysis of participation types and their stratification. Polit Res Q 66(1):91–101
Pietersen WJ (2009) Channel choice: citizens channel behavior and public service channel strategy. Thesis. University of Twente
Pietersen WJ, van Dyke J (2007) Channel choice determinants. An exploration of the factors that determine the choice of a service channel in citizen initiated contacts. In: Proceedings from the 8th annual international digital government research conference, pp 173–182
Pratchett L, Durose C, Lowndes V, Smith G, Stoker G, Wales C (2009) Empowering communities to influence local decision making: a systematic review of the evidence. Department for Communities and Local Government, London. http://www.ict-21.ch/com-ict/IMG/pdf/1241955Empowering-communities%20to-influence-local-decision-making.pdf. Accessed 28 July 2015
Reddick CG (2005) Citizen-initiated contacts with government. J E-Gov 2(1):27–53
Royo S, Yetano A, Acerete B (2014) Perceptions about the effectiveness of e-participation: a multistakeholder perspective. In: Rodríguez-Bolivár MP (ed) Measuring e-government efficiency. Springer, Berlin, pp 257–275
Schlozman KL, Verba S, Brady HE (2010) Weapon of the strong? participatory inequality and the internet. Perspect Polit 8(2):487–509
Schultz PW, Nolan JM, Cialdini RB, Goldstein NJ, Griskevicius V (2007) The constructive, destructive, and reconstructive power of social norms. Psychol Sci 18(5):429–434
Thaler RH, Sunstein CR (2008) Nudge—improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. Yale University Press, New Haven
Winkler R (2007) Electronic participation: theoretical reflections and empirical assessment—the EU’s online platform ‘Your Voice in Europe’. Thesis. University of Vienna, Vienna
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kubicek, H. (2016). What Difference Does the “E” Make? Comparing Communication Channels in Public Consultation and Collaboration Processes. In: Aichholzer, G., Kubicek, H., Torres, L. (eds) Evaluating e-Participation. Public Administration and Information Technology, vol 19. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25403-6_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25403-6_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-25401-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-25403-6
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)