Skip to main content

Citizen Panels on Climate Targets: Ecological Impact at Collective Level

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Evaluating e-Participation

Part of the book series: Public Administration and Information Technology ((PAIT,volume 19))

Abstract

The objective of this chapter is to ascertain whether the cooperation of citizens as participants of citizen panels has had a positive impact at collective level by contributing to the achievement of a 2 % annual reduction in the carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e) emissions in their city or region. This chapter discusses several challenges that emerged in the course of the analysis. These challenges suggest that a combination of different methodological approaches is the best option to assess the ecological impact of the citizen panels on the collective level. Results show that, depending on the kind of calculation, some panels met the reduction targets completely, others partially, and one did not at all. However, reductions in CO2e are the general trend, even in those panels that fail to achieve the target. So, altogether, improvements of the CO2e balances on the collective level have been achieved. An important finding is that the results of the panels (improvements or deteriorations) are the same after 1 year of measuring and after 2 years. So learning results are obtained in a single year and longer climate participation processes do not seem to be suited to achieving further savings, but to preventing relapse.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For context factors see also Chap. 7.

  2. 2.

    Values per month available at: www.tutiempo.net. Standard climate values available at: www.aemet.es. Last access: 2 October 2013.

  3. 3.

    Data at the regional level from the Spanish National Institute of Statistics (www.ine.es) shows that in the last quarter of the year 2008 the unemployment rate was around 7 % in both regions. However, in the first quarter of 2011 the figures were 19.5 % in Saragossa and 13.4 % in Pamplona. In the third quarter of 2012 (when the periodic measurements finished) the figures were 20 % and 15 %, respectively.

References

  • Abrahamse W, Steg L (2005) A review of intervention studies aimed at household energy conservation. J Environ Psychol 25:273–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boulanger PM, Couder J, Marenne Y, Nemoz S, Vanhaverbeke J, Verbruggen A, Wallenborn G (2013) Household energy consumption and rebound effect. Brussels, Belgian Science Policy (Research Programme Science for a Sustainable Development)

    Google Scholar 

  • CEPS—The Centre for European Policy Studies (2010) Greening EU Cities. The emerging EU strategy to address climate change. http://www.ceps.eu. Accessed 28 July 2015

  • Cooper S, Pearce G (2011) Climate change performance measurement, control and accountability in English local authority areas. Account Audit Account J 24(8):1097–1118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darby S (2006) The effectiveness of feedback on energy consumption. A review for DEFRA of the literature on metering, billing and direct displays. Environmental Change Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Devore JL, Berk KN (2011) Modern mathematical statistics with applications, 2nd edn. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrhardt-Martinez K, Donnelly KA, Laitner JA (2010) Advanced metering initiatives and residential feedback programs: a meta-review for household electricity-saving opportunities. American council for an energy-efficient economy, Report Number E105, June 2010, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2009) Europeans’ attitudes towards climate change, Special Eurobarometer 322

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2011) Climate change, Special Eurobarometer 372

    Google Scholar 

  • European Environment Agency (2013) GHG emissions by EU Member States 2013. http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/figures/greenhouse-gas-emissions-by-eea-1#tab-based-on-data. Accessed 28 July 2015

  • Fischer C (2008) Feedback on household electricity consumption: a tool for saving energy? Energy Effic 1:79–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gleerup M, Larsen A, Leth-Petersen S, Togeby M (2010) The effect of feedback by text message (SMS) and email on household electricity consumption: experimental evidence. Energy J 31(3):113–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Infas—Institut für angewandte Sozialwissenschaft (2012) Mobilität in der Region Hannover 2011. Erste Ergebnisse, April 2012, Bonn, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • KlimAktiv (2013) CO2 calculator, Impressum. http://klimaktiv.klimaktiv-co2-rechner.de/de_DE/page/impressum/?ref=background. Accessed 28 July 2015

  • OECD (2010) Cities and climate change. OECD Publishing, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfleiderer R (2009) Das Phänomen Verkehr. http://www.verkehrswissenschaftler.de. Accessed 28 July 2015

  • Romero-Lankao P (2012) Governing carbon and climate in the cities: an overview of policy and planning challenges and options. Eur Plan Stud 20(1):7–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schallaböck KO, Schneider C, Jansen U (2009) Vorläufiges Klimaschutzszenario—Mobilität, Klimaschutz- und Energieprogramm (KEP) 2020. Paper presented at KEP Workshop, Bremen, 8 September 2009

    Google Scholar 

  • Schleich J, Klobasa M, Brunner M, Gölz S, Götz K, Sunderer G (2011) Smart metering in Germany and Austria—results of providing feedback information in a field trial. Working paper sustainability and innovation, No. S 6/2011. Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research, Karlsruhe, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorrell S (2007) The rebound effect: an assessment of the evidence for economy-wide energy savings from improved energy efficiency. A report produced by the Sussex Energy Group for the Technology and Policy Assessment function of the UK Energy Research Centre, October 2007, London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Staats H, Harland P, Wilke H (2004) Effecting durable change: a team approach to improve environmental behavior in the household. Environ Behav 36(3):341–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thaler RH, Sunstein CR (2008) Nudge—improving decisions about health, wealth and happiness. Yale University Press, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ralf Cimander .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cimander, R., Royo, S., Yetano, A. (2016). Citizen Panels on Climate Targets: Ecological Impact at Collective Level. In: Aichholzer, G., Kubicek, H., Torres, L. (eds) Evaluating e-Participation. Public Administration and Information Technology, vol 19. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25403-6_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics