Skip to main content

Online vs Face-To-Face Engagement of Computing Teachers for their Professional Development Needs

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Informatics in Schools. Curricula, Competences, and Competitions (ISSEP 2015)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 9378))

Abstract

After a period of intense activity in preparation for the transition, Computing has been implemented in the curriculum in England for all children from ages 5-16. In this paper we investigate the aspects of professional development that Computing teachers are utilising. We conducted a survey of over 900 Computing teachers in England and use the results to reflect on the benefits of face-to-face vs online communities to support teachers. Our results show that teachers find the face-to-face events and training to be useful, and that teachers in our community are participating in many hours of professional development in order to address their needs in content knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge in Computing. Furthermore an online community is valuable in supporting teachers who require resources, access to expertise and guidance on curriculum issues in addition to face-to-face training, networking and support.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Benda, K., Bruckman, A., Guzdial, M.: When life and learning do not fit: Challenges of workload and communication in introductory computer science online. Trans. Comput. Educ. 12(4), 15:1–15:38 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Boston, W., Diaz, S.R., Gibson, A.M., Ice, P., Richardson, J., Swan, K.: An exploration of the relationship between indicators of the community of inquiry framework and retention in online programs. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 13(3), 67–83 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brown, N.C.C., Kolling, M., Crick, T., Peyton-Jones, S., Humphreys, S., Sentance, S.: Bringing Computer Science back into Schools: Lessons from the UK. In: Proceedings of the 44th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer science Education, SIGCSE 2013. ACM (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brown, N.C.C., Sentance, S., Crick, T., Humphreys, S.: Restart: The Resurgence of Computer Science in UK Schools. ACM Transactions of Computing Education 14(2) (June 2014)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Brown, N.C.C., Kölling, M.: A tale of three sites: Resource and knowledge sharing amongst computer science educators. In: Proceedings of the Ninth Annual International ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research, ICER 2013, pp. 27–34. ACM, New York (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cooper, S., Grover, S., Simon, B.: Building a Virtual Community of Practice for K-12 CS Teachers. Communications of the ACM 57(5), 39–41 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cordingley, P.: The Impact of Collaborative CPD on Classroom Teaching and Learning: Review: What Do Teacher Impact Data Tell Us about Collaborative CPD? EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  8. CSTA: Running on Empty. Tech. rep (2010), http://runningonempty.acm.org/

  9. CUREE: Understanding what enables high-quality professional learning. Tech. rep. Pearson (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Darling-Hammond, L., Wei, R.C., Andree, A., Richardson, N., Orphanos, S.: Professional learning in the learning profession. National Staff Development Council, Washington, DC (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Department for Education: National Curriculum for England: Computing programme of study. Tech. rep., Department for Education (2013), https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-curriculum-in-england-computing-programmes-of-study/national-curriculum-in-england-computing-programmes-of-study

  12. Dron, J., Seidel, C., Litten, G.: Transactional distance in a blended learning environment. Research in Learning Technology 12(2) (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ericson, B., Guzdial, M., Biggers, M.: A Model for Improving Secondary CS Education. SIGCSE Bull. 37(1), 332–336 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Fincher, S., Tenenberg, J.: Warren’s question. In: Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Computing Education Research, ICER 2007, pp. 51–60. ACM, New York (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Fishman, B., Konstantopoulos, S., Kubitskey, B.W., Vath, R., Park, G., Johnson, H., Edelson, D.C.: Comparing the impact of online and face-to-face professional development in the context of curriculum implementation. Journal of Teacher Education 64(5), 426–438 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Goode, J.: If you build teachers, will students come? the role of teachers in broadening computer science learning for urban youth. Journal of Educational Computing Research 36(1), 65–88 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Guskey, T.R., Yoon, K.S.: What works in Professional Development? The Leading Edge (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kennedy, A.: Models of continuing professional development: a framework for analysis. Journal of In-Service Education 31(2), 235–250 (2005), http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13674580500200277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lister, R., Adams, E.S., Fitzgerald, S., Fone, W., Hamer, J., Lindholm, M., McCartney, R., Moström, J.E., Sanders, K., Seppälä, O., Simon, B., Thomas, L.: A multi-national study of reading and tracing skills in novice programmers. In: Working Group Reports from ITiCSE on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, ITiCSE-WGR 2004, pp. 119–150. ACM, New York (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Luckin, R., Weatherby, K.: Online learning communities in context. International Journal of Web Based Communities 8(4), 440–454 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Matzat, U.: Do blended virtual learning communities enhance teachers’ professional development more than purely virtual ones? a large scale empirical comparison. Computers & Education 60(1), 40–51 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Morrison, B.B., Ni, L., Guzdial, M.: Adapting the disciplinary commons model for high school teachers: Improving recruitment, creating community. In: Proceedings of the Ninth Annual International Conference on International Computing Education Research, ICER 2012, pp. 47–54. ACM, New York (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ni, L., Guzdial, M.: Who Am I?: Understanding High School Computer Science teachers’ professional identity. In: Proceedings of the 43rd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, SIGCSE 2012, pp. 499–504. ACM, New York (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Schulte, C., Hornung, M., Sentance, S., Dagiene, V., Jevsikova, T., Thota, N., Eckerdal, A., Peters, A.K.: Computer science at school/cs teacher education: Koli working-group report on cs at school. In: Proceedings of the 12th Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research, Koli Calling 2012, pp. 29–38. ACM, New York (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Sentance, S., Dorling, M., McNicol, A.: Computer science in secondary schools in the uk: Ways to empower teachers. In: Diethelm, I., Mittermeir, R.T. (eds.) ISSEP 2013. LNCS, vol. 7780, pp. 15–30. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  26. Sentance, S., Humphreys, S., Dorling, M.: The Network of Teaching Excellence in Computer Science and Master Teachers. In: WIPSCE 2014 (Workshop in Primary and Secondary Computing Education). ACM (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Thompson, D., Bell, T.: Adoption of new Computer Science High School Standards by New Zealand teachers. In: Proceedings of the 44th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, SIGCSE 2013. ACM (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Timperley, H.S., Parr, J.M., Bertanees, C.: Promoting professional inquiry for improved outcomes for students in New Zealand. Professional Development in Education 35(2), 227–245 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Tseng, F.C., Kuo, F.Y.: A study of social participation and knowledge sharing in the teachers’ online professional community of practice. Computers & Education 72, 37–47 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Wenger, E.: Communities of practice: A brief introduction. National Science Foundation (US) (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Wenger, E., White, N., Smith, J.D.: Digital habitats: Stewarding technology for communities. CPsquare (2009)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sue Sentance .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Sentance, S., Humphreys, S. (2015). Online vs Face-To-Face Engagement of Computing Teachers for their Professional Development Needs. In: Brodnik, A., Vahrenhold, J. (eds) Informatics in Schools. Curricula, Competences, and Competitions. ISSEP 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9378. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25396-1_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25396-1_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-25395-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-25396-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics