Skip to main content

Demand Response Challenge in Smart Grid

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Evolution of Smart Grids

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Electrical and Computer Engineering ((BRIEFSELECTRIC))

  • 1221 Accesses

Abstract

As indicated in Chap. 3, for the successful deployment of the smart grid, demand-side management (DSM) or demand response [1–3] is crucial. DSM means the art of planning and implementation of the electric utility activities that is aimed to influence the users’ energy consumption by affecting desired changes in the shape of loads of the utility operator. While DSM aims at producing a change in the load-shape, it needs to balance the supply of the operator and the demand of the customers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. M. M. Fouda, Z. M. Fadlullah, N. Kato, A. Takeuchi, and Y. Nozaki, “A novel demand control policy for improving quality of power usage in smart grid,” in 2012 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM), Anaheim, California, USA, Dec. 2012, pp. 5154–5159.

    Google Scholar 

  2. C. Gellings, “The concept of demand-side management for electric utilities,” Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 73, no. 10, pp. 1468–1470, Oct. 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Z. M. Fadlullah, M. Q. Duong, N. Kato, and I. Stojmenovic, “A novel game-based demand side management scheme for smart grid,” in 2013 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC), Shanghai, China, Apr. 2013, pp. 4677–4682.

    Google Scholar 

  4. P. Samadi, R. Schober, and V. W. S. Wong, “Optimal energy consumption scheduling using mechanism design for the future smart grid,” in 2011 IEEE International Conference on Smart Grid Communications (SmartGridComm), Brussels, Belgium, Oct. 2011, pp. 369–374.

    Google Scholar 

  5. P. Samadi, A.-H. Mohsenian-Rad, R. Schober, V. Wong, and J. Jatskevich, “Optimal real-time pricing algorithm based on utility maximization for smart grid,” in 2010 First IEEE International Conference on Smart Grid Communications (SmartGridComm), Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA, Oct. 2010, pp. 415–420.

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. Wang, M. Biviji, and W. Wang, “Lessons learned from smart grid enabled pricing programs,” in 2011 IEEE Power and Energy Conference at Illinois (PECI), Urbana, IL, USA, Feb. 2011, pp. 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  7. A.-H. Mohsenian-Rad and A. Leon-Garcia, “Optimal residential load control with price prediction in real-time electricity pricing environments,” IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 120–133, Sep. 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  8. P. Tarasak, “Optimal real-time pricing under load uncertainty based on utility maximization for smart grid,” in Smart Grid Communications (SmartGridComm), 2011 IEEE International Conference on, Brussels, Belgium, Oct. 2011, pp. 321–326.

    Google Scholar 

  9. A.-H. Mohsenian-Rad, V. Wong, J. Jatskevich, R. Schober, and A. Leon-Garcia, “Autonomous demand-side management based on game-theoretic energy consumption scheduling for the future smart grid,” IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 320–331, Dec. 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  10. S. Bu, F. Yu, and P. Liu, “Dynamic pricing for demand-side management in the smart grid,” in Online Conference on Green Communications (GreenCom), 2011 IEEE, Sep. 2011, pp. 47–51.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Z. M. Fadlullah, D. M. Quan, N. Kato, and I. Stojmenovic, “GTES: an optimized game-theoretic demand-side management scheme for smart grid,” IEEE Systems Journal, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 588–597, Jun. 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  12. “An introduction to utility theory,” accessed Aug. 2015. [Online]. Available: http://www.norstad.org/finance/util.pdf

  13. G. H. and P. G., “Utility functions: From risk theory to finance,” North American Actuarial Journal (NAAJ), vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 74–100, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  14. “TEPCO,” accessed Aug. 2015. [Online]. Available: http://www.tepco.co.jp/e-rates/individual/data/

  15. J. Zhang and Q. Zhang, “Stackelberg game for utility-based cooperative cognitive radio networks,” in Proceedings of the Tenth ACM International Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking and Computing, ser. MobiHoc ’09. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2009, pp. 23–32. [Online]. Available: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1530748.1530753

  16. Mathworks - matlab and simulink for technical computing. [Online]. Available: http://www.mathworks.com/

  17. “Typical power consumption,” accessed Aug. 2015. [Online]. Available: http://www.oksolar.com/technical/consumption.html

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fadlullah, Z.M., Kato, N. (2015). Demand Response Challenge in Smart Grid. In: Evolution of Smart Grids. SpringerBriefs in Electrical and Computer Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25391-6_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25391-6_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-25389-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-25391-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics