Skip to main content

Introduction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Evolution of Smart Grids

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Electrical and Computer Engineering ((BRIEFSELECTRIC))

Abstract

This book discusses the smart grid [1–8]. The notion smart grid, linguistically, implies an electric power delivery grid having some level of “smartness.” Why do we consider these two elements then? First, consider the power system delivery grid. It has frequently been referred to as the greatest and most complex machine ever built in human civilization. In fact, the power grid is almost entirely a mechanical system, with only modest use of sensors, minimal electronic communication, and almost a total lack of electronic control. In the last two to three decades, almost all other industries in the western world have significantly become modernized with the utilization of sensors, communications, and computational ability leading to far greater improvement in efficiency, productivity, service quality, and environmental performance. The power grid system has not evolved, however. There was simply not much of a need for it to change because of the crude way this massive system works with a plethora of components including wires, cables, towers, transformers, circuit breakers, and many more you can possibly think of! When it has needed expansion, more of these components have just been bolted together without paying much attention to what may happen in future if the system needs sophistication or refurbishment. As the power grid started to become bigger in size, its complexity in terms of monitoring and repairing also increased significantly and manual control of the system gradually went out of scope. The industry initiated the use of automated monitoring and power system control with the help of computers began way back in the sixties. This, coupled with a modest use of sensors, has increased over time. Still, however, it is far from being ideal as the power companies lack real-time information on the customer demands and, therefore, are unable to smartly decide power generation and distribution scheduling tasks. The conventional grids, therefore, need to become better and smarter; but investors do not see much profit in retrofitting the old grid with older metering equipment and limited communication capability. This is why there is a lot of stress on the conventional power grid systems to evolve into next generation smart power grid

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The end-users of the smart grid may also be referred to as simply the users, or as the customers or consumers in the book.

References

  1. M. M. Fouda, Z. M. Fadlullah, N. Kato, R. Lu, and X. Shen, “A lightweight message authentication scheme for smart grid communications,” IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 675–685, Dec. 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  2. H. Liang, A. Tamang, W. Zhuang, and X. Shen, “Stochastic information management in smart grid,” IEEE Communications Surveys Tutorials, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 1746–1770, Mar. 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  3. M. M. Fouda, Z. M. Fadlullah, and N. Kato, “Assessing attack threat against zigbee-based home area network for smart grid communications,” in 2010 International Conference on Computer Engineering and Systems (ICCES), Cairo, Egypt, Nov.-Dec. 2010, pp. 245–250.

    Google Scholar 

  4. H. Liang, B. J. Choi, W. Zhuang, and X. Shen, “Stability enhancement of decentralized inverter control through wireless communications in microgrids,” IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 321–331, Mar. 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  5. M. M. Fouda, Z. M. Fadlullah, N. Kato, R. Lu, and X. Shen, “A lightweight message authentication scheme for smart grid communications,” Smart Grid, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 675–685, Dec. 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Z. M. Fadlullah, M. M. Fouda, N. Kato, A. Takeuchi, N. Iwasaki, and Y. Nozaki, “Toward intelligent machine-to-machine communications in smart grid,” IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 60–65, Apr. 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  7. A. Abdallah and X. Shen, “Lightweight security and privacy preserving scheme for smart grid customer-side networks,” IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, to appear.

    Google Scholar 

  8. H. Li, X. Lin, H. Yang, X. Liang, R. Lu, and X. Shen, “EPPDR: an efficient privacy-preserving demand response scheme with adaptive key evolution in smart grid,” IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, vol. 25, no. 8, pp. 2053–2064, Aug. 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  9. C. W. Gellings, The smart grid: Enabling energy efficiency and demand response. Fairmont Press, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fadlullah, Z.M., Kato, N. (2015). Introduction. In: Evolution of Smart Grids. SpringerBriefs in Electrical and Computer Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25391-6_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25391-6_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-25389-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-25391-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics