Advertisement

Limpopo Estuary Mangrove Transformation, Rehabilitation and Management

  • Salomão BandeiraEmail author
  • Henriques Balidy
Chapter
Part of the Estuaries of the World book series (EOTW)

Abstract

Limpopo River is among the most flood impacted rivers in southern and eastern Africa, having been flooded recurrently in many years. This paper deals with a successfully mangrove rehabilitation initiative in this river after floods in the year 2000 that devastated the estuarine mangrove. The flooding from upstream increased the width of the river from around 200 meters to several kilometers, drowning the mangrove forests for around 45 days, and causing sediment transformation and mangrove forest degradation, uprooting and dieback. The mean annual discharge of Limpopo River is usually 170 m3/s. However, during the floods of 2000, the river exhibited a peak upstream flash of 16 515 m3/s. River basin property and livelihoods were affected. The mangrove forest at Limpopo was, from the 1980’s, known to cover only 387 ha, even though the Limpopo is the second largest river in Mozambique (after Zambezi). However, new recent research revealed a historical mangrove cover of 928 ha, of which 382 ha (41.2%) are quite pristine and 546 ha (58.8%) degraded. This prompted a mangrove rehabilitation in 2010 of with the species Avicennia marina, Bruguiera gymnorhiza, Ceriops tagal, Rhizophora mucronata and Xylocarpus granatum, with 26.3 ha replanted with 94 453 seedlings out of 168 367 produced in the nursery (74% survival rate). The Centre for Sustainable development of the Coastal Zones (CDZ-ZC) is the focus institution in mangrove rehabilitation process, which provided the initial training on nursery and replantation techniques. This chapter provides also insights of community engagement in the management of the Limpopo estuarine mangroves.

Keywords

Upstream floods Mangrove degradation Community participation Nursery Replantation Eastern Africa 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Funding for the Limpopo River mangrove restauration program was provided from several sources; namely, PASA I and II (government funding), IUCN, UNEP, USAID and RESILIM. The authors kindly acknowledge the staff of the CDS-ZC, with emphasis to the Director, Manuel Poio. Our vote of thanks is extended to the residents of Mahielene village, the Government of Xai-Xai District, and to the local community leadership at the Limpopo estuary for community mobilization and sensitization to join the mangrove rehabilitation program. Students from UP-Gaza University helped while visiting the nursery and replantation site. Our acknowledgements also are extended to the reviewers of this manuscript.

References

  1. Alongi DM (2008) Mangrove forests: resilience, protection from tsunamis and responses to global climate change. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 76:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. ARA-Sul – Administração Regional das Águas do Sul (2002) Mapas de privisão da bacia do Limpopo. Versão final, Maputo (in Portuguese)Google Scholar
  3. Artur L, Hilhorst D (2012) Everyday realities of climate change adaptation in Mozambique. Glob Environ Chang 22:529–536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Balidy HJ, Sitoe A, Menomussanga M, Pires PL (2005) Avaliação dos níveis de corte, composição específica e regeneração natural de mangal no Sul de Moçambique. Technical report. CDS-ZC, Xai-Xai, 20 pp (in Portuguese)Google Scholar
  5. Bandeira SO, Macamo CCF, Kairo JG, Amade F, Jidawi N, Paula J (2009) Evaluation of mangrove structure and condition in two trans-boundary areas in the Western Indian Ocean. Aquat Conserv Mar Freshw Ecosyst 19(1):46–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barbosa FMA, Cuambe CC, Bandeira SO (2001) Status and distribution of mangroves in Mozambique. S Afr J Bot 67:393–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Beentje H, Bandeira S (2007) A field guide to the mangrove trees of Africa and Madagascar. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, 91 ppGoogle Scholar
  8. Bosire JO, Dahdouh-Guebas F, Walton M, Crona BI, Lewis RR III, Field C, Kairo JG, Koedam N (2008) Review functionality of restored mangroves: a review. Aquat Bot 89:251–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Colloty BM (2001) Botanical importance in the former Ciskei7Transkei region. PhD thesis, University of Port ElizabethGoogle Scholar
  10. Datta D, Chattopadhyay RN, Guha P (2012) Community based mangrove management: a review on status and sustainability. J Environ Manage 107:84–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. ESRI – Environmental Systems Research Institute (1996) Using arc view GIS. The geographic information system for everyone TM. 350 pp, USAGoogle Scholar
  12. ESRI – Environmental Systems Research Institute (1998) Using arc view GIS mage analysis. 208 pp, USAGoogle Scholar
  13. Fatoyinbo T, Simard M, Washington-Allen L, Shugart H (2008) Landscape extent, height, biomass, and carbon estimation of Mozambique’s mangrove forests with Landsat ETM+ and shuttle radar topography mission elevation data. J Geophys Res, 113:13pp. doi: 10.1029/2007JG000551 Google Scholar
  14. Giri C, Zhu Z, Tieszen L, Singh A, Gillete S, Kelmelis A (2008) Mangrove forest distributions and dynamics (1975–2005) of the tsunami-affected region of Asia. J Biogeogr 35:519–528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. INGC, UEM, FEWS Net Mind (2003) Atlas para Preparação e Resposta Contra Desastres na Bacia do Limpopo, Maputo (in Portuguese)Google Scholar
  16. Kairo JG, Dahdouh-Guebas F, Bosire J, Koedam N (2001) Restoration and management of mangrove systems – a lesson for and from the East African region. S Afr J Bot 67:383–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kairo JG, Lang’at JKS, Dahdouh-Guebas F, Bosire J, Karachi M (2008) Structural development and productivity of replanted mangrove plantations in Kenya. For Ecol Manage 255:2670–2677CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kirui B (2013) Importance and dynamics of the mangroves in Kenya. Devs Earth Surf Process 16:193–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Macamo C, Balidy H, Bandeira S (2014) Incomati mangrove deforestation. In: Bandeira S, Paula J (eds) The Maputo Bay ecosystem. WIOMSA, Zanzibar Town, pp 127–130Google Scholar
  20. Mavume A, Pinto I, Massuanganhe E (2014) Potential climate change impacts on Maputo Bay. In: Bandeira S, Paula J (eds) The Maputo Bay ecosystem. WIOMSA, Zanzibar Town, pp 383–397Google Scholar
  21. Ministério da Planificação e Desenvolvimento (2013) Diagnóstico Preliminar e Acções de Reconstrução Pós-Calamidades (2013). Report, Maputo, 49 pp (in Portuguese)Google Scholar
  22. Munji CA, Bele MY, Idinoba ME, Sonwa DJ (2014) Floods and mangrove forests, friends or foes? Perceptions of relationships and risks in Cameroon coastal mangroves. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 140:67–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Nakayama M (2003) International waters in Southern Africa (Water Resources Management and Policy). United Nations University Press, USA, 318 pp. ISBN 9280810774Google Scholar
  24. Paula J, Macamo C, Bandeira S (2014) Mangroves of Maputo Bay. In: Bandeira S, Paula J (eds) The Maputo Bay ecosystem. WIOMSA, Zanzibar Town, pp 109–126Google Scholar
  25. Primavera JH, Rollon RN, Samson MS (2011) The pressing challenges of mangrove rehabilitation: pond reversion and coastal protection. Treatise Estuar Coal Sci 10:217–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Randy AF, Hutomo M, Purnama H (2015) Collaborative efforts on mangrove restoration in Sedari village, Karawang district, West Java province. Procedia Environ Sci 23:48–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Saket M, Mathusse R (1994) Study for the determination of the rate of deforestation of the mangrove vegetation in Mozambique. FAO/PNUD/MOZ/92/013. Unidade de Inventário Florestal Departamento de Florestas, DNFFB. Min da Agricultura, Maputo (in Portuguese)Google Scholar
  28. Sitoe SR, Risberg J, Norström E, Snowball I, Holmgren K, Achimo M, Mugabe J (2015) Paleo-environment and flooding of the Limpopo River-plain, Mozambique, between c. AD 1200–2000 Catena 126: 105–116Google Scholar
  29. Spalding M, Kainuma M, Collins L (2010) World atlas of mangroves. A collaborative project of ITTO, ISME, FAO, UNEP-WCMC, UNESCO-MAB, UNU – INWEH and TNC. Earthscan, London, 319 ppGoogle Scholar
  30. Turner JR, Klaus R (1996) Remote sensing of coastal habitats. In: M. Richmond (ed) A Field Guide to the Seashores of Eastern African and the Western Indian Ocean Islands. Sida/SAREC-UDSM, Dar Es Salaam, pp 44–45Google Scholar
  31. Vaz AC (2000) Coping with floods – the experience of Mozambique. WARFSA/WaterNet symposium: sustainable use of water resources, Maputo, 1–2 November 2000Google Scholar
  32. WMO – World Meteorological Organization (2012) Limpopo river basin. A proposal to improve the floods forecasting and early warning systemGoogle Scholar
  33. Yanagisawa H, Koshimura S, Goto K, Miyagi T, Imamura F, Ruangrassamee A, Tanavud C (2009) The reduction effects of mangrove forest on a tsunami based on field surveys at Pakarang Cape, Thailand and numerical analysis. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 81:27–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Biological SciencesUniversidade Eduardo MondlaneMaputoMozambique
  2. 2.Centre for Sustainable Development of the Coastal Zones (CDS-ZC)Ministry for Land, Environment and Rural DevelopmentXai-Xai BeachMozambique

Personalised recommendations